| ID |
Date |
Author |
Status |
Type |
Category |
Location |
Title |
|
293
|
Tue Nov 28 11:32:17 2023 |
Ronic Chiche | Fixed | info | mechanics | detectors and electronics | ThomX igloo | Smaract motors parameters and controller |
current Smaract motors parameters :
- Closed loop Max frequency : 5000
- Signal Amplitude threshold : 2047
- High voltage threshold : 511
when one drives the Smaract motors in "closed loop" mode, one can get a displacement as small as 50nm... but at the price of a delock of the laser/FP-cavity.
when one drives the motor in "open loop" mode, 1 step is equivalent to 4µm !!! it is much larger than the laser PZT range.
when one drives the motor in "Piezo Scan" mode with a speed of 1V/s, one can move the motor without losing the laser/Fp-cavity lock.
the PZT voltage range of 100V (max value) is roughly equivalent to 2-3µm of round trip length, which is enough to manage several "fast" (10-20 minutes) oscillations of the laser frequency :
see these posts to get some info on the laser frequency oscillations : https://elog.lal.in2p3.fr/FPC/THOMX+commissioning/289
   |
|
3
|
Tue Oct 2 16:23:54 2018 |
Ronic Chiche | Fixed | issue | mechanics | cabling | software | Optical room | test des vérins ISP |
* les vérins de 20mm (axe Z) ont été testés sur table grace à une rallonge SUB-C - DB9, au chassis ISP et au soft SUPERVISEUR écrit en labwindows CVI par Didier.
pour rappel, la course soft va de -1 650 000 à +1 650 000 pour 20mm de course, soit 0.6mm pour 100 000 de course soft.
ils ont été réglés en positions minimale (-1 650 000) pour que Yann puisse les intégrer facilement dans le chassis mécanique.
* une fois installés dans la capsule, les signaux passent par le feedthrough de la capsule.
MAIS cette capsule a vocation a être intégrée au chassis mécanique, intégré lui-même dans une enceinte et les signaux passent alors par un autre feedthrough, celui de l'enceinte.
Il faut donc IMPERATIVEMENT ce feedthrough (ou l'effet miroir qu'il produit) pour tester correctement les vérins dans leur capsule ! |
|
4
|
Tue Oct 2 18:00:36 2018 |
Ronic Chiche | Fixed | issue | mechanics | cabling | software | Optical room | test des vérins ISP |
| Ronic Chiche wrote: |
|
* les vérins de 20mm (axe Z) ont été testés sur table grace à une rallonge SUB-C - DB9, au chassis ISP et au soft SUPERVISEUR écrit en labwindows CVI par Didier.
pour rappel, la course soft va de -1 650 000 à +1 650 000 pour 20mm de course, soit 0.6mm pour 100 000 de course soft.
ils ont été réglés en positions minimale (-1 650 000) pour que Yann puisse les intégrer facilement dans le chassis mécanique.
* une fois installés dans la capsule, les signaux passent par le feedthrough de la capsule.
MAIS cette capsule a vocation a être intégrée au chassis mécanique, intégré lui-même dans une enceinte et les signaux passent alors par un autre feedthrough, celui de l'enceinte.
Il faut donc IMPERATIVEMENT ce feedthrough (ou l'effet miroir qu'il produit) pour tester correctement les vérins dans leur capsule !
|
|
| Attachment 1: CABLAGE_VERINS.pdf
|
|
5
|
Wed Oct 3 11:28:46 2018 |
Ronic Chiche | Fixed | report | mechanics | cabling | Optical room | test des vérins ISP 20mm et 6mm |
Après avoir utilisé la chaine : driver ISP - cable ISP DB9 - Feedthrough enceinte DB9-DB9 - cable perlé DB9-SUB-C - Capsule SUB-C,
l'ensemble de tous les vérins 6mm et 20mm ont été testés => ils fonctionnent TOUS.
Les vérins 6mm ont TOUS subis un HOME. cette commande cherche une fin de course du vérin et le place ensuite en position médianne.
Au niveau soft, la course d'un vérin 6mm va de -22 000 à +22 000. Après un HOME, chaque vérin est postionné à la valeur 0. |
|
6
|
Fri Oct 5 10:17:30 2018 |
Ronic Chiche | Fixed | report | mechanics | cabling | Optical room | test des vérins ISP 20mm et 6mm |
| Ronic Chiche wrote: |
|
Après avoir utilisé la chaine : driver ISP - cable ISP DB9 - Feedthrough enceinte DB9-DB9 - cable perlé DB9-SUB-C - Capsule SUB-C,
l'ensemble de tous les vérins 6mm et 20mm ont été testés => ils fonctionnent TOUS.
Les vérins 6mm ont TOUS subis un HOME. cette commande cherche une fin de course du vérin et le place ensuite en position médianne.
Au niveau soft, la course d'un vérin 6mm va de -22 000 à +22 000. Après un HOME, chaque vérin est postionné à la valeur 0.
|
Précision : le HOME sur les vérins de 6mm place AUTOMATIQUEMENT le vérin en position médianne après avoir atteint une fin de course (FDC)
Pour les vérins de 20mm, la commande HOME place le vérin sur sa FDC positive : +1 650 000 mais NE DEPLACE PAS ensuite automatiquement le vérin en position médiane.
Il faut le faire de façon manuelle.
Tous les vérins 20mm vont subir un HOME et être placés manuellement en position 0.
Il faut ensuite leurs envoyer un offset +825 000 ou -825 000 selon les vérins pour que la cavité ait une conformation rectangulaire.
(actuellement elle ne l'est pas à cause de cales de longueurs différentes selon les axes pour anticiper les effets thermiques à compenser ultérieurement).
|
|
8
|
Mon Oct 22 11:27:35 2018 |
Ronic Chiche | Fixed | info | mechanics | Optical room | Remontage mécanique |
Mail de Yann du 12/10/2018 :
Je vous fais le bilan des actions effectuées :
1/ La mécanique a été remontée avec changement des billes céramiques, soufflet défectueux, ect...
2/ Test et mise en place des vérins en position
3/ nettoyage des chambres et insertions de la méca
4/ connectorisation des câbles perlés et test des vérins par le soft
5/ fermeture des brides
6/ nettoyage du marbre et de la zone
On est donc prêt pour les test de vide et d'étuvage.
RAPPEL pour tous :
Des nouvelles combinaisons propres sont à disposition (on ne sort pas du flux avec la combi !)
Mettre MASQUE / CHARLOTTE / COMBI / GANTS !
Ne pas rentrer de CARTONS ou autres sources de pollution.
NETTOYER les outils ou objets à rentrer dans la zone
RANGER après les manips. |
|
9
|
Mon Oct 22 11:29:41 2018 |
Ronic Chiche | Fixed | info | mechanics | Optical room | Remontage des vérins |
Mail de Yann du 8/10/2018 :
Bonjour,
Tous les vérins sont maintenant OK ! Merci Ronic.
La cavité a été réglé en mode nominal (tilt à +2/-2 et Z à +5/-15 ou -5/+15).
Demain avec Christopher on remet tous dans les enceintes à vide.
Du coup, Patrick tu pourras ré-connecter les câbles céramique (à partir de demain apres midi).
On est dans les temps pour des tests de vide et d'étuvage a partir de lundi prochain.
A+
Yann. |
|
17
|
Tue Feb 19 15:50:08 2019 |
Loïc Amoudry | Fixed | info | mechanics | Optical room | Motors connexions |
Motors are connected. The true mirror's name are P1 for injection mirrors, S2, S3 and P4. (S=spherical, P=planar).
They are still some old schemes (and notations on the cavity) which mention M1, M2, M3 and M4. I make the link here:
M3 = P1
M1 = S2
M2 = S3
M4 = P4
The wires are plugged as follows (I use notations wrote on the cavity and wires):
M3x = 1-1
M3y = 1-2
M3z = 2-1
M1x = 1-3
M1y = 1-4
M1z = 2-2
M2x = 1-5
M2y = 1-6
M2z = 2-3
M4x = 1-7
M4y = 1-8
M4z = 2-4 |
| Attachment 1: Validation_moteurs.jpg
|
 |
|
19
|
Tue Mar 19 17:01:52 2019 |
Loïc Amoudry | Fixed | issue | mechanics | Optical room | Motors Z axis reversed |
S2 and S3 z-axis are initially at 1/4 (5mm/20mm) of there range over ~20mm range. This is meant to be able to spread them up to ~15mm in case of thermal effect.
Actually, they are in an opposite position. Means that they can only be spread of 5mm from the initial position. |
|
23
|
Thu Mar 28 09:25:58 2019 |
Loïc Amoudry | Fixed | issue | mechanics | Optical room | Motors Z axis reversed |
All Z motors (for P1, S2, S3 and P4) have been initialized again with a proper HOME command with their own controller with the "superviser" software (which means they all moved to the +1650000 position).
Thus, they have been moved to their default position : +825000 for spherical mirrors (S2 and S3) and -825000 for plan mirrors (P1 and P4).
reminder : lower values on the motors makes the motor tip going inside which makes the cavity length larger.
thus spherical mirrors are in default position with a possible big range to put inside the motor tip (for thermal effects compensation).
by complementarity, plan mirrors are in default position with a possible big range to put outside the motor tip.
the Labwindows CVI was buggy about the proper representation of the motors motion in Z direction (wrong direction and wrong default position).
the software is now fixed.
| Loïc Amoudry wrote: |
|
S2 and S3 z-axis are initially at 1/4 (5mm/20mm) of there range over ~20mm range. This is meant to be able to spread them up to ~15mm in case of thermal effect.
Actually, they are in an opposite position. Means that they can only be spread of 5mm from the initial position.
|
|
|
64
|
Thu Oct 3 13:49:58 2019 |
Loïc Amoudry | Fixed | info | mechanics | Optical room | Pneumatic valves |
Frederic and Manu from vacuum group came this morning to fix again the pneumatic valves which had a leak again. |
|
73
|
Thu Oct 10 18:03:10 2019 |
Ronic Chiche | Fixed | issue | mechanics | Optical room | First Lock with 2nd satge of amplifier : Motor issue ? |
Global locking almost clean : tranmission and reflection are quite noiseless except the peaks at every 500ms.
During the amplifier 2nd stage lock, we experienced 2 strange behaviors :
- short "unlocks" every 500ms exactly all the time, during the whole lock process
- some PZT (in green on the picture) shift exactly synchronized with these "unlocks" (see the red circle).
these shifts are triggered by some OneFive motor move (Frep adjustment).
We tried to disconnect software activity (use the disconnect button on the software), to disconnect USB cable, to disconnect power supply of the motor controller box but none of these actions had an effect
=> still short unlocks every 500ms...
The amplifier 2nd stage seems to have small fan for the power supply... we can try to disconnect it.
We tried to turn on the 3rd stage which uses several fans for cooling the pump diodes... thus, one can see immediatly a big increasing in the PZT signal which tries to compensate the vibrations and quicly one loose the lock.
we have to think on how to suppress these vibrations.
|
| Attachment 1: Image1.png
|
 |
|
82
|
Tue Nov 26 16:11:52 2019 |
Ronic Chiche | Fixed | issue | mechanics | Optical room | First Lock with 2nd satge of amplifier : Motor issue ? |
The 500 ms noise disapeared. We had to disable the "power save" mode of the smaract translation stage. AND turn OFF and ON the controler box.
| Ronic Chiche wrote: |
|
Global locking almost clean : tranmission and reflection are quite noiseless except the peaks at every 500ms.
During the amplifier 2nd stage lock, we experienced 2 strange behaviors :
- short "unlocks" every 500ms exactly all the time, during the whole lock process
- some PZT (in green on the picture) shift exactly synchronized with these "unlocks" (see the red circle).
these shifts are triggered by some OneFive motor move (Frep adjustment).
We tried to disconnect software activity (use the disconnect button on the software), to disconnect USB cable, to disconnect power supply of the motor controller box but none of these actions had an effect
=> still short unlocks every 500ms...
The amplifier 2nd stage seems to have small fan for the power supply... we can try to disconnect it.
We tried to turn on the 3rd stage which uses several fans for cooling the pump diodes... thus, one can see immediatly a big increasing in the PZT signal which tries to compensate the vibrations and quicly one loose the lock.
we have to think on how to suppress these vibrations.
|
|
|
112
|
Mon Jan 17 10:04:14 2022 |
Ronic Chiche | Fixed | info | mechanics | ThomX igloo | Documentation about mechanics on Atrium |
https://atrium.in2p3.fr/0dded51a-1cb0-43e6-ae0d-626cd5db7078
a lot of schematics regarding the FP cavity are stored by the mechanic group on the Atrium repository. |
|
363
|
Mon Sep 16 12:03:30 2024 |
Ronic Chiche | Fixed | info | mechanics | ThomX igloo | Finding correct motors position and parameters to keep the lock during a move |
this morning, I try to find a new region for MOT.03 and MOT.06 where we can move them without unlocking the cavity.
I started from the position:
MOT06 : ~ -785 000
MOT03 : ~ -200 000
and I do -10 000 steps (dz = 10k x 6nm = 60µm) at a time on both motors.
previously a good region for MOT.06 was -900 000 !
I moved also the laser cavity by 40µm to cancel the beating with the RF frequency.
MOT06 : ~ -795 000
MOT03 : ~ -191 000
Max power after optimazing the CEP ~ 65kW => I need to realign => 78kW
I need to increase the D parameter on the PID to compensate the (85kW / 78kW ratio).
I changed the MOT.03 and MOT.06 speed to 30steps/s => it seems a bit better.
but I still see some lock losses during a move.
.... to be continued...
|
|
364
|
Tue Sep 17 12:48:13 2024 |
Ronic Chiche | Fixed | info | mechanics | ThomX igloo | Finding correct motors position and parameters to keep the lock during a move |
this morning with Daniele, we did a quite long run with this motor position and it seems we don't lose the lock too much.
the motor positions are:
MOT.03 (M4): -186 500 steps
MOT.06 (M1): -797 500 steps
we got 85kW after CEP optimization and rough alignment optimization.
| Ronic Chiche wrote: |
|
this morning, I try to find a new region for MOT.03 and MOT.06 where we can move them without unlocking the cavity.
I started from the position:
MOT06 : ~ -785 000
MOT03 : ~ -200 000
and I do -10 000 steps (dz = 10k x 6nm = 60µm) at a time on both motors.
previously a good region for MOT.06 was -900 000 !
I moved also the laser cavity by 40µm to cancel the beating with the RF frequency.
MOT06 : ~ -795 000
MOT03 : ~ -191 000
Max power after optimazing the CEP ~ 65kW => I need to realign => 78kW
I need to increase the D parameter on the PID to compensate the (85kW / 78kW ratio).
I changed the MOT.03 and MOT.06 speed to 30steps/s => it seems a bit better.
but I still see some lock losses during a move.
.... to be continued...
|
|
|
204
|
Tue Apr 4 13:03:23 2023 |
Manar Amer | Fixed | report | lasers and optics | vacuum | detectors and electronics | ThomX igloo | Cavity Alighnment |
Today, we prepared lenses for a telescope for the CW laser injection into the cavity, yet to be installed
Image of the transmission at P4 attached, an estimation of the beam size of the mode see is ~ 5.5 mm
The vacuum in the 2 optical cavities is decreasing but slowly. today it is 2.6 - 2.4 * 10^-7 mbar
| Manar Amer wrote: |
|
Last week, with Ronic and Victor we aligned the cavity using CW laser (Koheras)
- we have also installed 4 mirrors in the cavity with the best theoretical qualities (serial number and images included)
- The Plan ULE mirror P4 thickness was not compatible with the piezoelectric mount. We had to install a metal spacer behind the mirror to be able to fix it. the metal spacers in from ThorLabs made from INOX, It is 1 inch diameter (25.4 mm), we drilled a hole in the middle of 15 mm in the Workshop in bat 200. Then cleaned it using an ultrasound bath in pure water, using a small Ultrasound bath machine in Maverics platform Vide and Surfaces next to ThomX eglo.
-
- This gives some difficulties in imaging the transmission at P4. To help with the imaging, we used the plastic #D printed irises that Yann made long time ago
- we took images of the mode inside the cavity at P4 transmission.
- We also observed some oxidization on the metal bars of the controllers, more on the side of S2 and P4. we are yet to test the motion of the motors in the z-axis.
- Friday evening we closed the windows using a new copper rings (last one we have, Ronic placed a new order).
- The pump was turned on by Bruno and Eric yesterday afternoon. The current vacuum level is 6-7*10^-6 mbar
the pre and the turbo pimps are on so still too noisy to work, we have access all day tomorrow.
|
|
| Attachment 1: 20230404_P4_Transmission.jpg
|
 |
| Attachment 2: 20230404_vacuum_level.jpg
|
 |
|
20
|
Fri Mar 22 17:53:10 2019 |
Loïc Amoudry | Fixed | report | lasers and optics | vacuum | Optical room | Cavity at atm pressure |
Dry air injected into the cavity.
Lock has been proceeded without any trouble. ~~4000 finesse. Considered to be the same than before.
x and y motors axis put back to the last "cavity at air" position. z position kept at maximum distance between spherical mirrors. |
| Attachment 1: finessealair.isf
|
|
12
|
Wed Jan 16 14:54:14 2019 |
Loïc Amoudry | Fixed | report | lasers and optics | utilities | Optical room | Cleaning outside IP cavity |
From 7th january to 11th january.
|
| Attachment 1: Avant_nettoyage.jpg
|
 |
| Attachment 2: Apres_une_semaine_nettoyage_lingettes_et_brosseadents.jpg
|
 |
| Attachment 3: Sans_UV_traces_scotch_nettoyees_apres_baking.jpg
|
 |
|
179
|
Wed Jan 11 17:31:00 2023 |
Ronic Chiche | Fixed | info | lasers and optics | software | ThomX igloo | Alphanov amplifier beam profile measurement |
Today with Ronic
For the Temperature fluctuation :
- we checked the valves of the tubes bumping water into the chiller from ThomX main water supply, they were working Ok
- we have also done "auto-tuning" of the chiller
If the controlled temperature fluctuates constantly after reaching the target temperature, perform auto-tuning . Controller calculates optimum control PID and set automatically.
This function sets the values necessary for the control system such as PID (proportional band, integral time, derivative time and ratio of cooling/heating gain) automatically.
after there was no temperature fluctuation and it was ok.
we turned on the amplifier @ 40 % amplification ~ 18 W , the error of temperature on the alphanov software satrted after 10 - 15 min
Then we turned it on @ 20% amplification ~ 9W, it showed after 5 min.
For the Beam profile measurement, we have a 750 mm lens to measure the M^2 and the beam divergence (to be finished!!)
Also installed an iris close the path to cut the bump beam when doing the measurements.
We checked the shape at closer distance similar to the one done on Monday (where the fit was not so good ~ 88%) and it is better, reaching 93% of Gaussian beam fit with the iris (being careful not to cut the beam power).
| Ronic Chiche wrote: |
|
this morning with Manar,
- we checked first the chiller problem.
the fluctations of +/-2° around 25°C are still there.
I discussed with Jean-Noel Cayla about the possible problem of the "dirty" water in the primary circuit.
he told me that the water goes through 3 "effective" filters, then the water should not be too dirty in the primary circuit even if one uses "common water" to fill it.
he told me also that the water temperature could be a bit higher than before, around 22°C, and that could prevent a good thermal exchange with the secundary circuit (the one of the amplifier).
=> the resistivity is about 7Mohmhs.
we had again a "case temperature alarm" from the Alphanov Software, after 1h of work @ 20%
this stopped the amplifier, we did not restart it.
- we measured the beam path with the wedges :
compressor box output to mirror : 17cm
mirror to 1s wedge : 24 cm
1st wedge to 2nd wedge : 24.5 cm
2nd wedge to lift bottom mirror : 136 cm
lift bottom mirror to top mirror : 14 cm
lift top mirror to beam profiler (x=0) : 7 cm
- we measured the beam profile at 3 positions with amplifier @ 20% + 2 wedges :
the power is ~ 70 µW
we made the measurements at x=0, x=60 cm, x=120cm
after that, we had the Alphanov amplifier "temperature case incident" and we stopped the measurements.
| Ronic Chiche wrote: |
|
yesterday morning with Manar,
1) we fixed the threshold level of the laser input signal which makes the measurement of the repetition rate.
(if the rep rate is not measured properly, the amplifier safety interlock stops immediately the amplification).
we followed a tutorial from Guillaume Machinet.
when you start the Alphanov control software, 4 panels pops up : central control, 2nd stage amplifier, and 2 panels for controlling the pumps of the 3rd stage amplifier.
!!! Warning !!! ..... if you switch ON the amplifier using the central control panel, the amplifier starts immediately AT FULL POWER..... !!! Warning !!!
it is not mentionned in the tutorial document.
to prevent this problem, you first need to switch "Laser OFF" on the 2 panels controlling the pumps of the 3rd stage amplifier and let "Laser ON" only on the panel controlling the 2nd stage.
after starting the amplifier, we tried to find the median value of the threshold to get ~33MHz instead of 100MHz measured previously.
the initial voltage threshold on the photodiode measuring the rep rate was 0.4V which leads to get 100MHz.
first, we changed step by step the threshold to reach 0.87V => one gets 33MHz.
we tried the find the maximum threshold but once the level is above the signal maximum value, it triggers an alarm and stops immediately the amplifier.
then, one needs to restart completely the software which can be tedious due to connections/alarms issues.
finaly, we found out that the low and high level thresholds to get 33MHz were not reproductible at each start of the amplifier... :-(
then, we put the threshold at 1V following the turial procedure which seems to work.
2) we installed the optical scheme to make the beam profile measurement : see attached image
we used the HR mirror close to the amplifier output (as putting a wedge at that place is not convenient if you want to properly dump the transmission and reflections).
and then, we placed 2 wedges, using the front reflection to get low power beam profile.
the Thorlabs LB2 has been used to dump the transmission of the first wedge, it can handle 25kW/cm² and 25J/cm².
we used black aluminium screens to dump the secondary beams.
we measured after the 2 wedges :
amplifier at 20% => 71µW
amplifier at 30% => 139µW
amplifier at 40% => 200µW
it has to be compared with the amplifier power :
amplifier at 20% => 8.7 W
amplifier at 30% => 17 W
amplifier at 40% => 26 W
which leads to a reflection coefficient of the wedge of 0.28%.
=> OK, as one uses PS811-B Thorlabs 4° wedges with B coating.
with B coating, the reflectivity given by the manufacturer is around 0.3% @ 1030nm.
unfortunately, we had a "case temperature alarm" coming from the Alphanov software when we reached 40% for the amplification level.
this alarm stopped immediately the amplifier.
we saw that the chiller was in warning state too and the "present temperature PV" was not stable at all, flutuating by 3-4 degrees after the amplifier has been turned off...
we restarted several times the chiller to see if the problem disapears but it was still there ! => to be investiguated !
PS : we changed the USB cable between the amplifier controler and the PC to try to fix the several "connexion lost" problems but it didn't help...
PS2 : after discussing with Sophie Chance and Marie Jacquet, ThomX suffered a water circuit leakage on Monday:
the full circuit has been emptied and they had to remplace the water by some common water and not demineralized water....
it can be related to the chilller issue observed yesterday !
| Ronic Chiche wrote: |
|
today with Manar, we brought everything to make the profile measurement.
the chiller was in error because of the water level : we filled it in.
! warning ! there is no alarm signal, only a message on the screen.
we checked the incoming power measured by the software : 5.5 mW => OK
and we measured the output power (with pump) for :
0% => ~ 300 mW
10% => ~900 mW
20% => 8.65 W
30% => 17W
=> same as before.
the first HR mirror at the output of the amplifier was slightly scratched => we replaced it.
for sake of simplicity, we plan to use first a HR mirror and then 2x wedges for the profile measurement => to be checked next time.
we have to remove secundary beam reflections, then wedges are easier to use than AR/AR mirrors (as the 2 reflected beams are parallele).
at full power, the output power is ~ 70W
after 1st wedge : 2.8W
after 2nd wedge : 112 mW => the power should be low enough to use absorptive filters in front of the beam profiler.
|
|
|
|
| Attachment 1: error_signal_Temperature_case_amplifier.jpg
|
 |