HOME SBOX THOMX MINICAV Utilities
THOMX orders THOMX installation THOMX commissioning THOMX control command
  Status of commissioning, report also here plots are reports., Page 19 of 24  Not logged in ELOG logo
ID Date Author Status Type Category Location Titledown
  103   Fri Nov 6 14:23:16 2020 Loïc AmoudryFixedreportlasers and opticsOptical roomBeam size and finesse

Measurement behind P4 (planar mirror)

Loïc Amoudry wrote:

FSR initiale : 33.34 MHz (S3 = -825000 et S4 = -825000)

Beam size initiale : wx=2.05mm et wy=2.15mm

Finesse initiale : 3400

 

FSR après éloignement des miroirs sphériques : 33.29 MHz (S3 ~= -1496000 et S4 ~= -1496000)

Beam size : wx=1.7mm et wy=1.85mm

Finesse : 3600

 

FSR après rapprochement des miroirs sphériques : 33.39 MHz (S3 ~= -250000 et S4 ~= -500000)

Beam size : wx = 2.1mm et wy=2.4mm

 

Fit de la caméra jamais au dessus de 90%. ~~80%.

 

  88   Fri Feb 7 14:46:55 2020 Ronic ChicheFixedreportlasers and opticsOptical roomBeam pulse duration

We installed the 2 CVBG for compression after the amplifier.
We used an interferometric technique with a delay line and combining the two paths in a CCD to measure interferences... see interferences.avi video file
One can notice some misalignement at the end of the video.

After supressing the global shape of the superposed pulses, one measures the amplitude of the remaining fringes (peak-peak or standard deviation) each 250µm of the delay line (500µm of round-trip). one gets the interferences pulse shape with a FWHM of 6ps...
It seems that an 'after pulse' is visible in the interferences.

An other meausurement using a 2 photons photodiode will be used to confirm this measurement.

 

Attachment 1: interferences.avi
Attachment 2: pulse_duration.png
pulse_duration.png
  89   Wed Feb 12 17:43:43 2020 Ronic ChicheFixedreportlasers and opticsOptical roomBeam pulse duration

Yesterday, Loic installed a telescope before CVBG's to reduce the spot size on CVBG's and reduced the incident angle 0.5-1° on them (on the datasheet the specified incident angle is 2.8°).

We used an interferometric technique with a delay line and combining the two paths in a CCD to measure interferences.

After supressing the global shape of the superposed pulses, one measures the amplitude of the remaining fringes (standard deviation) each 50µm of the delay line (100µm of round-trip). one gets the interferences pulse shape with a FWHM of 2 ps... (see curve)
we still see an 'after pulse'.

if the pulse is 1ps long and 100kW is stored in the cavity, it means 3GW peak for the whole beam... it is comparable with the damage threshold of the mirror !!!

 

 

 

Ronic Chiche wrote:

We installed the 2 CVBG for compression after the amplifier.
We used an interferometric technique with a delay line and combining the two paths in a CCD to measure interferences... see interferences.avi video file
One can notice some misalignement at the end of the video.

After supressing the global shape of the superposed pulses, one measures the amplitude of the remaining fringes (peak-peak or standard deviation) each 250µm of the delay line (500µm of round-trip). one gets the interferences pulse shape with a FWHM of 6ps...
It seems that an 'after pulse' is visible in the interferences.

An other meausurement using a 2 photons photodiode will be used to confirm this measurement.

 

 

Attachment 1: pulse_width.png
pulse_width.png
  90   Fri Feb 14 09:26:07 2020 Ronic ChicheFixedreportlasers and opticsOptical roomBeam pulse duration

Yesterday, Loïc put the CVBG's back to their specified angles.

We used an interferometric technique with a delay line and combining the two paths in a CCD to measure interferences.

After supressing the global shape of the superposed pulses, one measures the amplitude of the remaining fringes (standard deviation) each 50µm of the delay line (100µm of round-trip). one gets the interferences pulse shape with a FWHM of 2.5 ps... (see curve)

from Fabian calculation, at 100kW, with w=2mm, the fluence on mirror should be around 0.05J/cm^2.

from this article (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0030402618313275), the damage threshold for SiO2/Ta2O5 multilayers should be around 4.8J/cm^2 @ 1030nm

 

Ronic Chiche wrote:

Yesterday, Loic installed a telescope before CVBG's to reduce the spot size on CVBG's and reduced the incident angle 0.5-1° on them (on the datasheet the specified incident angle is 2.8°).

We used an interferometric technique with a delay line and combining the two paths in a CCD to measure interferences.

After supressing the global shape of the superposed pulses, one measures the amplitude of the remaining fringes (standard deviation) each 50µm of the delay line (100µm of round-trip). one gets the interferences pulse shape with a FWHM of 2 ps... (see curve)
we still see an 'after pulse'.

if the pulse is 1ps long and 100kW is stored in the cavity, it means 3GW peak for the whole beam... it is comparable with the damage threshold of the mirror !!!

 

 

 

Ronic Chiche wrote:

We installed the 2 CVBG for compression after the amplifier.
We used an interferometric technique with a delay line and combining the two paths in a CCD to measure interferences... see interferences.avi video file
One can notice some misalignement at the end of the video.

After supressing the global shape of the superposed pulses, one measures the amplitude of the remaining fringes (peak-peak or standard deviation) each 250µm of the delay line (500µm of round-trip). one gets the interferences pulse shape with a FWHM of 6ps...
It seems that an 'after pulse' is visible in the interferences.

An other meausurement using a 2 photons photodiode will be used to confirm this measurement.

 

 

 

Attachment 1: interferences_pulse_duration.png
interferences_pulse_duration.png
  94   Mon Feb 24 16:28:52 2020 Ronic ChicheFixedreportlasers and opticsOptical roomBeam pulse duration

Last Thursday (20th of February), Loïc and Titouan realigned the stretcher CVBG to its nominal angle and they used an interferometric technique with a delay line and combining the two paths in a CCD to measure interferences.

After supressing the global shape of the superposed pulses, one measures the amplitude of the remaining fringes (standard deviation) each 50µm of the delay line (100µm of round-trip).
one gets the interferences pulse shape with a FWHM of 2.3 ps... (see curve)

Ronic Chiche wrote:

Yesterday, Loïc put the CVBG's back to their specified angles.

We used an interferometric technique with a delay line and combining the two paths in a CCD to measure interferences.

After supressing the global shape of the superposed pulses, one measures the amplitude of the remaining fringes (standard deviation) each 50µm of the delay line (100µm of round-trip). one gets the interferences pulse shape with a FWHM of 2.5 ps... (see curve)

from Fabian calculation, at 100kW, with w=2mm, the fluence on mirror should be around 0.05J/cm^2.

from this article (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0030402618313275), the damage threshold for SiO2/Ta2O5 multilayers should be around 4.8J/cm^2 @ 1030nm

 

Ronic Chiche wrote:

Yesterday, Loic installed a telescope before CVBG's to reduce the spot size on CVBG's and reduced the incident angle 0.5-1° on them (on the datasheet the specified incident angle is 2.8°).

We used an interferometric technique with a delay line and combining the two paths in a CCD to measure interferences.

After supressing the global shape of the superposed pulses, one measures the amplitude of the remaining fringes (standard deviation) each 50µm of the delay line (100µm of round-trip). one gets the interferences pulse shape with a FWHM of 2 ps... (see curve)
we still see an 'after pulse'.

if the pulse is 1ps long and 100kW is stored in the cavity, it means 3GW peak for the whole beam... it is comparable with the damage threshold of the mirror !!!

 

 

 

Ronic Chiche wrote:

We installed the 2 CVBG for compression after the amplifier.
We used an interferometric technique with a delay line and combining the two paths in a CCD to measure interferences... see interferences.avi video file
One can notice some misalignement at the end of the video.

After supressing the global shape of the superposed pulses, one measures the amplitude of the remaining fringes (peak-peak or standard deviation) each 250µm of the delay line (500µm of round-trip). one gets the interferences pulse shape with a FWHM of 6ps...
It seems that an 'after pulse' is visible in the interferences.

An other meausurement using a 2 photons photodiode will be used to confirm this measurement.

 

 

 

 

Attachment 1: Interferences_pulse_width.png
Interferences_pulse_width.png
  16   Thu Feb 14 18:20:52 2019 Loïc AmoudryFixedreportmechanics | lasers and opticsOptical roomBasic alignment & alignment motors check

14/02/19: The 4 motors but Mby control works. Mby motor home does not bring it to its "middle" position but to the end of its range. Issue circumvented using the higher rights software.

The beam is now going through the cavity windows (from P1 to S2).

  78   Wed Nov 13 14:44:56 2019 Loïc AmoudryFixedreportlasers and opticsOptical roomAmplifier output power

The ouput power of the ThomX amplifier has been measured as a function of the 3rd stage pumps current (0A is 1st and 2nd stage turned on).

We measured the total power, the total power without the "donuts" pump signal dumped by an iris and the transmission of a dichroic mirror (for ref see image).

Attachment 1: dichroic.PNG
dichroic.PNG
Attachment 2: courbe.PNG
courbe.PNG
Attachment 3: power.xlsx
  79   Wed Nov 13 15:05:18 2019 Loïc AmoudryFixedreportlasers and opticsOptical roomAmplifier output power

 

Loïc Amoudry wrote:

The ouput power of the ThomX amplifier has been measured as a function of the 3rd stage pumps current (0A is 1st and 2nd stage turned on).

We measured the total power, the total power without the "donuts" pump signal dumped by an iris and the transmission of a dichroic mirror (for ref see image).

 

Attachment 1: courbedichro.PNG
courbedichro.PNG
  154   Tue Aug 30 18:31:49 2022 Loïc AmoudryFixedreportlasers and opticsOptical roomAmplifier output power

We checked the Dichroic mirror we have : it is a DMSP1000 shortpass dichroic mirror as specified in this post.

The Arrow engraved on the edge of the mirror points on the AR surface !
not on the HR surface...

the AOI is 45°.

Loïc Amoudry wrote:

The ouput power of the ThomX amplifier has been measured as a function of the 3rd stage pumps current (0A is 1st and 2nd stage turned on).

We measured the total power, the total power without the "donuts" pump signal dumped by an iris and the transmission of a dichroic mirror (for ref see image).

 

  40   Tue Jun 11 18:03:10 2019 Loïc AmoudryFixedreportmechanics | lasers and opticsOtherAmplifier mission Bordeaux

Voyage Bordeaux au CELIA avec Jérôme LHERMITE (Loïc et Titoutan)

1er jour (34°) :

Mesure du spectre et de la puissance des 4 diodes de pompe 3ème étage jusqu’à ~60W (12A).
Mécanique et câblage ampli.

2ème jour (30°) :

Soudure des fibres des diodes de pompe 3ème étage avec les fibres du recirculateur.
Câblage entre les 2 boitiers et fixation des fibres dans le boitier du 3ème étage.

3ème jour (26°) :

Connexion refroidissement à eau du recirculateur (chiller).
Soudure fibre CFBG avant 1er étage (temporaire pour faire des mesure).
Mise en place des éléments 1er et 2ème étage sur le support de l’ampli.
Montée en puissance 35W.

4ème jour :

Adaptation du mode de sortie en contrôlant la position de la fibre avant le collimateur.
Mesure de M².
 

Attachment 1: 1st_and_2nd_stage.jpg
1st_and_2nd_stage.jpg
Attachment 2: 3rd_stage_pumps.jpg
3rd_stage_pumps.jpg
Attachment 3: 3rd_stage_signal.jpg
3rd_stage_signal.jpg
  41   Wed Jun 12 12:07:11 2019 Loïc AmoudryFixedreportmechanics | lasers and opticsOtherAmplifier mission Bordeaux

M² mesuré à 10W.
M²x = 1.17
M²y = 1.14

Loïc Amoudry wrote:

Voyage Bordeaux au CELIA avec Jérôme LHERMITE (Loïc et Titoutan)

1er jour (34°) :

Mesure du spectre et de la puissance des 4 diodes de pompe 3ème étage jusqu’à ~60W (12A).
Mécanique et câblage ampli.

2ème jour (30°) :

Soudure des fibres des diodes de pompe 3ème étage avec les fibres du recirculateur.
Câblage entre les 2 boitiers et fixation des fibres dans le boitier du 3ème étage.

3ème jour (26°) :

Connexion refroidissement à eau du recirculateur (chiller).
Soudure fibre CFBG avant 1er étage (temporaire pour faire des mesure).
Mise en place des éléments 1er et 2ème étage sur le support de l’ampli.
Montée en puissance 35W.

4ème jour :

Adaptation du mode de sortie en contrôlant la position de la fibre avant le collimateur.
Mesure de M².
 

 

Attachment 1: Ampli_ThomX.PNG
Ampli_ThomX.PNG
Attachment 2: M2_ThomX.png
M2_ThomX.png
  98   Fri Feb 28 09:20:37 2020 Ronic ChicheNot Fixedissuelasers and opticsOptical roomAmplifier laser diodes issue

This is a long time issue for the ThomX amplifier : on the 4 pumping diodes available, the 1st diode has a higher temperature than the others around 40°C (see the picture).
the problem comes from the TEC which is not activated (see diodes parameter files in execel format). the related software windows are shaded.

I phoned to Jerome to ask him if one can securely activate the TEC, and he answered "yes".
but once the TEC is activated by loading parameters and modifying the line of the TEC activation, the temperature does'nt fall down as it seems the TEC does'nt work properly.
maybe it is not connected properly ? to be checked...

the result is, as the diode temperature is too high, an alarm is fired and the diode is deactivated... impossible to increase the current.

one has to deactivate the TEC and shut down electrically the amplifier to go back to the starting point.

Conclusion :
- the TEC of the diode 1 does'nt work properly.
- one can't activate it otherwise an alarm is fired and the diode is disabled.
- one should check the TEC connections in the amplifier

Attachment 1: Problem_TEC.PNG
Problem_TEC.PNG
Attachment 2: param_diode_1.csv
Current Max;10
Current Source;0
Current Slope;3
Laser Activation;1
Laser Temperature;25
DCDC Voltage;10.4
DCDC Voltage Mode;1
APC Mode;0
APC Power;0
Device 0;0
Device 1;0
Device 2;0
Voltage Max;20
Functionment Mode;0
Frequency;1
Pulse Width;100000
Init State;1
Fan Mode;1
Fan Voltage;0
TEC Activation;0
Laser Temperature Max;45
Case Temperature Min;10
Case Temperature Max;60
Potentiometer Calibration;5
Transimpedance Gain;2000
PD_EXT_1 Threshold;0
Serial Number;1708
Software Type;1
Software Version0;3
Software Version1;3
Software Version2;0
Hardware Version0;3
Hardware Version1;1
Hardware Version2;0
Equipments0;4
Equipments1;1
Equipments2;0
Equipments3;0
Attachment 3: param_diode_2.csv
Current Max;10
Current Source;0
Current Slope;3
Laser Activation;1
Laser Temperature;25
DCDC Voltage;10.6
DCDC Voltage Mode;1
APC Mode;0
APC Power;0
Device 0;0
Device 1;0
Device 2;0
Voltage Max;20
Functionment Mode;0
Frequency;1
Pulse Width;100000
Init State;1
Fan Mode;1
Fan Voltage;0
TEC Activation;1
Laser Temperature Max;45
Case Temperature Min;10
Case Temperature Max;60
Potentiometer Calibration;5
Transimpedance Gain;2000
PD_EXT_1 Threshold;0
Serial Number;1708
Software Type;1
Software Version0;3
Software Version1;3
Software Version2;0
Hardware Version0;3
Hardware Version1;1
Hardware Version2;0
Equipments0;4
Equipments1;1
Equipments2;0
Equipments3;0
  195   Tue Mar 14 16:54:48 2023 Manar AmerFixedreportlasers and optics | detectors and electronicsThomX iglooAmplifier Beam Profile over time

This morning, with Ronic, we opened the compressor box to observe if there is any misalignment of the mounts or the CVBG's

a comparison slide between the Beam Profile over time and measurements we have taken, is included.
 
we noticed today that the images need a rotation, and I took the assumption we did not rotate last year and did the rotation of the previous images.
Comparing the last two images, they look slightly similar. but the one from last year is much better than the current one
(remembering it was taken, when we aligned the CVBG's and the chiller was @23, now the temperature is @25 for the chiller)
 
The image we took today is also better than the one from yesterday.
(we take the image when the compressor box is open)

Attachment 1: comparision_Between_Beam_profile_over_time.jpg
comparision_Between_Beam_profile_over_time.jpg
  196   Wed Mar 15 21:13:07 2023 Manar AmerFixedreportlasers and optics | detectors and electronicsThomX iglooAmplifier Beam Profile over time

This morning we took data of the beam profile at 4 different points to see the evolution of

  • the beam shape
  • divergence

over distance for all amplification percentages

Data plotted for the distance vs radius for all and divergence in rad is extracted and plotted as a variation of amplification power.

Added is the Excel file with all the details and the PowerPoint for referance

Manar Amer wrote:

This morning, with Ronic, we opened the compressor box to observe if there is any misalignment of the mounts or the CVBG's

a comparison slide between the Beam Profile over time and measurements we have taken, is included.
 
we noticed today that the images need a rotation, and I took the assumption we did not rotate last year and did the rotation of the previous images.
Comparing the last two images, they look slightly similar. but the one from last year is much better than the current one
(remembering it was taken, when we aligned the CVBG's and the chiller was @23, now the temperature is @25 for the chiller)
 
The image we took today is also better than the one from yesterday.
(we take the image when the compressor box is open)

 

Attachment 1: Beam_wavefront_setup.jpg
Beam_wavefront_setup.jpg
Attachment 2: Slide2.JPG
Slide2.JPG
Attachment 3: Slide3.JPG
Slide3.JPG
Attachment 4: Slide4.JPG
Slide4.JPG
Attachment 5: Slide5.JPG
Slide5.JPG
Attachment 6: Slide6.JPG
Slide6.JPG
Attachment 7: Slide7.JPG
Slide7.JPG
Attachment 8: Slide8.JPG
Slide8.JPG
Attachment 9: Slide9.JPG
Slide9.JPG
Attachment 10: 20230315_Data.xlsx
  197   Wed Mar 15 21:14:51 2023 Manar AmerFixedreportlasers and optics | detectors and electronicsThomX iglooAmplifier Beam Profile over time

Information about today's work is added to logBook !!

Manar Amer wrote:

This morning we took data of the beam profile at 4 different points to see the evolution of

  • the beam shape
  • divergence

over distance for all amplification percentages

Data plotted for the distance vs radius for all and divergence in rad is extracted and plotted as a variation of amplification power.

Added is the Excel file with all the details and the PowerPoint for referance

Manar Amer wrote:

This morning, with Ronic, we opened the compressor box to observe if there is any misalignment of the mounts or the CVBG's

a comparison slide between the Beam Profile over time and measurements we have taken, is included.
 
we noticed today that the images need a rotation, and I took the assumption we did not rotate last year and did the rotation of the previous images.
Comparing the last two images, they look slightly similar. but the one from last year is much better than the current one
(remembering it was taken, when we aligned the CVBG's and the chiller was @23, now the temperature is @25 for the chiller)
 
The image we took today is also better than the one from yesterday.
(we take the image when the compressor box is open)

 

 

  133   Fri Mar 18 11:48:14 2022 Ronic ChicheFixedinfolasers and opticsThomX iglooAlphanov amplifier power measurement

This morning, with Manar and Aurélien, we measure the power directly at the output of the Alphanov amplifier with the 2 compressors CVBG (seeding laser at Frep = 133MHz)
(we had to remove the base plate where the deflector mirrors were mounted to put the large powermeter).

with the previously described procedure, it seems that the Alphanov software is now working and we were able to start immediately the amplifier.

the chiller temperature was set at 25°C but we saw in the Alphanov documentation that the chiller temperature was closer to 20°C.
we did several measurements at 25°C and 20°C and it doesn't change a lot the output power.
so, we set the temperature to 23°C to avoid condensation (if too cold).
we will ask Guillaume what is the best temperature for the chiller.

power measurements:
power ratio     =>   measured output power (with external powermeter, not with the software)
10%               =>               1W
20%               =>               9W
30%               =>               17.6W
40%               =>               26.4W
50%               =>               34.5W
60%               =>               42.5W
70%               =>               49.3W
80%               =>               56.6W
90%               =>               63.6W
100%             =>               ~70W (expected value, not measured)

we stopped the measurements at 90% as we observed a difference in the software between the expected values (previously recorded by Alphanov) and the present ones.
the present values are quite bigger than the ones measured by Alphanov.
Aurélien will call Guillaume to check if it is a problem or not.

Attachment 1: power_after_compressor_vs_current_for_133MHz_laser.png
power_after_compressor_vs_current_for_133MHz_laser.png
  134   Fri Mar 18 15:04:30 2022 Ronic ChicheFixedinfolasers and opticsThomX iglooAlphanov amplifier power measurement

answers from Guillaume:

- the chiller temperature has to be set to 25°C
- the power measured with the software can change a little from what Alphanov measured with their laser.
=> one can set power tolerances to 30% in the "caracterisation.csv" file.

Ronic Chiche wrote:

This morning, with Manar and Aurélien, we measure the power directly at the output of the Alphanov amplifier.
(we had to remove the base plate where the deflector mirrors were mounted to put the large powermeter).

with the previously described procedure, it seems that the Alphanov software is now working and we were able to start immediately the amplifier.

the chiller temperature was set at 25°C but we saw in the Alphanov documentation that the chiller temperature was closer to 20°C.
we did several measurements at 25°C and 20°C and it doesn't change a lot the output power.
so, we set the temperature to 23°C to avoid condensation (if too cold).
we will ask Guillaume what is the best temperature for the chiller.

power measurements:
power ratio     =>   measured output power (with external powermeter, not with the software)
10%               =>               1W
20%               =>               9W
30%               =>               17.6W
40%               =>               26.4W
50%               =>               34.5W
60%               =>               42.5W
70%               =>               49.3W
80%               =>               56.6W
90%               =>               63.6W
100%             =>               ~70W (expected value, not measured)

we stopped the measurements at 90% as we observed a difference in the software between the expected values (previously recorded by Alphanov) and the present ones.
the present values are quite bigger than the ones measured by Alphanov.
Aurélien will call Guillaume to check if it is a problem or not.

 

  170   Wed Nov 9 13:03:50 2022 Ronic ChicheFixedissuelasers and opticsThomX iglooAlphanov amplifier issue

on Monday morning 7/11, we tried to restart the Alphanov amplifier which was not turned on since end of april 2022, but it didn't start.

we did a standard "turn ON" procedure :
- check the safety button on the front panel (which has to be released).
- switch on the black switch on the rear panel.
- push the green button on the rear panel
- turn on the key on the front panel
- push the start button on the front panel

normally after switching on the black switch on the rear panel, a light shines in between the red and green big button on the read panel.
but nothing in that case. we just ear a weak "rotating fan" noise coming from the inside of the rack.

normally, after pushing the green button on the rear panel, the start button on the front panel comes to blue.
but nothing in that case.

normally, after pushing the green button on the rear panel and turning the key, the start button on the front panel comes to red.
but nothing in that case.

we tried anyway to connect the amplifier with a computer, just in case of...
but the Alphanov software is not able to connect to the amplifier.

One possible issue could be a dead fuse inside the black ON/OFF switch on the rear panel => one has to check it !

  171   Wed Nov 9 14:49:52 2022 Ronic ChicheFixedissuelasers and opticsThomX iglooAlphanov amplifier issue

I just tested the fuse inside the black ON/OFF switch on the rear panel => it is OK ! :-(

Ronic Chiche wrote:

on Monday morning 7/11, we tried to restart the Alphanov amplifier which was not turned on since end of april 2022, but it didn't start.

we did a standard "turn ON" procedure :
- check the safety button on the front panel (which has to be released).
- switch on the black switch on the rear panel.
- push the green button on the rear panel
- turn on the key on the front panel
- push the start button on the front panel

normally after switching on the black switch on the rear panel, a light shines in between the red and green big button on the read panel.
but nothing in that case. we just ear a weak "rotating fan" noise coming from the inside of the rack.

normally, after pushing the green button on the rear panel, the start button on the front panel comes to blue.
but nothing in that case.

normally, after pushing the green button on the rear panel and turning the key, the start button on the front panel comes to red.
but nothing in that case.

we tried anyway to connect the amplifier with a computer, just in case of...
but the Alphanov software is not able to connect to the amplifier.

One possible issue could be a dead fuse inside the black ON/OFF switch on the rear panel => one has to check it !

 

  172   Thu Dec 1 13:51:05 2022 Ronic ChicheFixedissuelasers and opticsThomX iglooAlphanov amplifier issue

The laser amplifier controller has been sent yesterday and received today by Alphannov.

they should do the assessment quickly...

Ronic Chiche w

I just tested the fuse inside the black ON/OFF switch on the rear panel => it is OK ! :-(

Ronic Chiche wrote:

on Monday morning 7/11, we tried to restart the Alphanov amplifier which was not turned on since end of april 2022, but it didn't start.

we did a standard "turn ON" procedure :
- check the safety button on the front panel (which has to be released).
- switch on the black switch on the rear panel.
- push the green button on the rear panel
- turn on the key on the front panel
- push the start button on the front panel

normally after switching on the black switch on the rear panel, a light shines in between the red and green big button on the read panel.
but nothing in that case. we just ear a weak "rotating fan" noise coming from the inside of the rack.

normally, after pushing the green button on the rear panel, the start button on the front panel comes to blue.
but nothing in that case.

normally, after pushing the green button on the rear panel and turning the key, the start button on the front panel comes to red.
but nothing in that case.

we tried anyway to connect the amplifier with a computer, just in case of...
but the Alphanov software is not able to connect to the amplifier.

One possible issue could be a dead fuse inside the black ON/OFF switch on the rear panel => one has to check it !

 

 

ELOG V3.1.4-395e101