HOME SBOX THOMX MINICAV Utilities
SBOX orders SBOX installation SBOX commissioning SBOX control command
  Status of commissioning, report also here plots are reports., Page 1 of 13  Not logged in ELOG logo
ID Date Author Status Type Categorydown Location Title
  67   Wed Mar 23 18:11:22 2022 Manar AmerFixedreportutilitiesOptical roomDust Cleaning of SBox

An Initial cleaning of the KBoX outside was done, All the optics and mechanics placed that were on the table were removed.

Only the old Mitylaser amplifier remains on the table.

Since we will be using the ThomX Celia amplifier, we will remove it and place it in a secure location (to be decided).

Tomorrow a cleaning of the inside of the cavity box is to be done.

Attachment 1: Log_Top_window.jpg
Log_Top_window.jpg
Attachment 2: Log_Reflection_window.jpg
Log_Reflection_window.jpg
Attachment 3: Log_Injection_Side_window.jpg
Log_Injection_Side_window.jpg
Attachment 4: Log_Injection_side_window2.jpg
Log_Injection_side_window2.jpg
  68   Wed Mar 23 18:17:45 2022 Manar AmerFixedreportutilitiesOptical roomDust Cleaning of SBox

The cleaning was done twice with half an hour interval between the two times
reading on the dust meter was taken after each time, and it was zero averaged over a 10-min

Manar Amer wrote:

An Initial cleaning of the KBoX outside was done, All the optics and mechanics placed that were on the table were removed.

Only the old Mitylaser amplifier remains on the table.

Since we will be using the ThomX Celia amplifier, we will remove it and place it in a secure location (to be decided).

Tomorrow a cleaning of the inside of the cavity box is to be done.

 

  70   Tue Mar 29 16:27:34 2022 Manar AmerFixedreportutilitiesOptical roomSpincoater - Mirrror cleaning

In preparation for cleaning the mirrors.

The spincoater has been moved with its bump into the sas of the SBox.

The pure water used will be provided by Alice, as the previous source in the workshop is not available.

 

  121   Thu Jul 28 13:52:23 2022 Aurélien MartensFixedreportutilitiesOptical roomchiller for CELIA amplifier

The chiller of CELIA amplifier has been moved from the corridor to the changing room in front of PLIC. 

It was not functionning well (quick drop of flow below 0.9l/min). After several cleanings of the filter, shorting the water circuit a stable 2.1l/min flow was obtained. Then the water circuit was elongated to go close to the amplifier but not into it. Allowing to get about 1.3l/min stable. Now the amplifier is conencted, the filter has been cleaned again twice and the flow seem stable with 1.4l/min. New filters have been ordered and must arrive quickly. Changing it is necessary I think. 

  122   Mon Aug 8 11:11:28 2022 Aurélien MartensFixedreportutilitiesOptical roomchiller for CELIA amplifier

today, temperature of the chiller has been set to 23°C.

measured temperature in the chiller reaches 23°C after approximatively 10 minutes

Aurélien Martens wrote:

The chiller of CELIA amplifier has been moved from the corridor to the changing room in front of PLIC. 

It was not functionning well (quick drop of flow below 0.9l/min). After several cleanings of the filter, shorting the water circuit a stable 2.1l/min flow was obtained. Then the water circuit was elongated to go close to the amplifier but not into it. Allowing to get about 1.3l/min stable. Now the amplifier is conencted, the filter has been cleaned again twice and the flow seem stable with 1.4l/min. New filters have been ordered and must arrive quickly. Changing it is necessary I think. 

 

  228   Tue Dec 3 13:51:52 2024 Ronic ChicheFixedinfoutilitiesOptical roomoptical table cleaning

this morning with Alice and Daniele, we removed all the optics elements and equipments from the SBOX optical table and started to clean it.
the dust meter count 0 on all particle sizes after the cleaning.

we observed a small part of the SBOX which seems to be oxydised (see picture).

the two previously used mirrors of the SBOX (C23018/7 and C23017/2) were already in their plastic boxes outside of the SBOX.
they are still on the optical table.

we have to decide which mirrors to put in the cavity:

if we don't want to use a "new" ThomX coupling mirror M1, we have to use a Gamma-factory mirror (161185) with T=460ppm for example (we don't have any other FS plan mirrors).

if we don't plan to work at high power in the SBOX for the moment, we could use an "old" ThomX M2 mirror with ROC=2.241m (C1611/11) to avoid any risk of contamination of a "new" ThomX M2 mirror.

Attachment 1: Oxydation.jpg
Oxydation.jpg
Attachment 2: 20241203_113105.jpg
20241203_113105.jpg
Attachment 3: 20241203_125359.jpg
20241203_125359.jpg
  229   Fri Dec 6 16:59:57 2024 Ronic ChicheFixedinfoutilitiesOptical roomoptical table cleaning

this afternoon, we checked the dust meter which is at 0 for 1 and 5µm dust particles but ~ 2000-3000 for 0.3µm particles.

we opened the two top panels to let the air flow clean the inside of the vessel.

we observed some other minor oxydised regions (than the one taken in picture) on the external parts of the inox panels but at first sight, nothing inside the vessel.

Ronic Chiche wrote:

this morning with Alice and Daniele, we removed all the optics elements and equipments from the SBOX optical table and started to clean it.
the dust meter count 0 on all particle sizes after the cleaning.

we observed a small part of the SBOX which seems to be oxydised (see picture).

the two previously used mirrors of the SBOX (C23018/7 and C23017/2) were already in their plastic boxes outside of the SBOX.
they are still on the optical table.

we have to decide which mirrors to put in the cavity:

if we don't want to use a "new" ThomX coupling mirror M1, we have to use a Gamma-factory mirror (161185) with T=460ppm for example (we don't have any other FS plan mirrors).

if we don't plan to work at high power in the SBOX for the moment, we could use an "old" ThomX M2 mirror with ROC=2.241m (C1611/11) to avoid any risk of contamination of a "new" ThomX M2 mirror.

 

  231   Tue Mar 4 18:33:26 2025 Ronic ChicheFixedinfoutilitiesOptical roomoptical table cleaning

now, it seems the table is clean enough (dust meter counts 0 particles) to install a 2 mirrors FP-cavity.

Ronic Chiche wrote:

this afternoon, we checked the dust meter which is at 0 for 1 and 5µm dust particles but ~ 2000-3000 for 0.3µm particles.

we opened the two top panels to let the air flow clean the inside of the vessel.

we observed some other minor oxydised regions (than the one taken in picture) on the external parts of the inox panels but at first sight, nothing inside the vessel.

Ronic Chiche wrote:

this morning with Alice and Daniele, we removed all the optics elements and equipments from the SBOX optical table and started to clean it.
the dust meter count 0 on all particle sizes after the cleaning.

we observed a small part of the SBOX which seems to be oxydised (see picture).

the two previously used mirrors of the SBOX (C23018/7 and C23017/2) were already in their plastic boxes outside of the SBOX.
they are still on the optical table.

we have to decide which mirrors to put in the cavity:

if we don't want to use a "new" ThomX coupling mirror M1, we have to use a Gamma-factory mirror (161185) with T=460ppm for example (we don't have any other FS plan mirrors).

if we don't plan to work at high power in the SBOX for the moment, we could use an "old" ThomX M2 mirror with ROC=2.241m (C1611/11) to avoid any risk of contamination of a "new" ThomX M2 mirror.

 

 

  71   Wed Mar 30 18:53:01 2022 Manar AmerFixedreportmechanics | lasers and optics | utilitiesOptical roomDust Cleaning of SBox

The inside of the cavity was cleaned today. It was very dirty and had big dust particles and fibers inside.

Cleaning was done for everything; wall, floor, fixed mounts, wires (still have some dust difficult to remove), edges.

The dust meter average was measured outside the cavity (2471 p/m3 av 6 min)  and inside after cleaning (1424 p/m3 av 10 min).

The cavity was left open under the clean air flow, will observe it under UV, clean and measure Dust tomorrow.

Images attached are after cleaning.

Objects inside the cavity at the moment :

  • 4 main mirror mounts
  • 4 mirror fixers on mounts and 3 screws each (total 12)
  • 2 reflecting mirror mounts
  • 2 dielectric mirrors (mounted and to be cleaned)
  • two mounts for D-shaped mirrors.
  • 2 D-shaped mirrors (unmounted, and they will need cleaning)
  • 2 metal irises (pinholes)

 

Manar Amer wrote:

The cleaning was done twice with half an hour interval between the two times
reading on the dust meter was taken after each time, and it was zero averaged over a 10-min

Manar Amer wrote:

An Initial cleaning of the KBoX outside was done, All the optics and mechanics placed that were on the table were removed.

Only the old Mitylaser amplifier remains on the table.

Since we will be using the ThomX Celia amplifier, we will remove it and place it in a secure location (to be decided).

Tomorrow a cleaning of the inside of the cavity box is to be done.

 

 

Attachment 1: 20220330_SBox_Inside_Cavity_Box.jpg
20220330_SBox_Inside_Cavity_Box.jpg
Attachment 2: 20220330_Injection_Mount_UV.jpg
20220330_Injection_Mount_UV.jpg
Attachment 3: 20220330_Reflection_One_UV.jpg
20220330_Reflection_One_UV.jpg
Attachment 4: 20220330_Reflection_two_UV.jpg
20220330_Reflection_two_UV.jpg
Attachment 5: 20220330_Dust_Meter_Inside_cavity_Av10min.jpg
20220330_Dust_Meter_Inside_cavity_Av10min.jpg
Attachment 6: 20220330_Dust_Meter_Outside_cavity_Av6min.jpg
20220330_Dust_Meter_Outside_cavity_Av6min.jpg
  72   Thu Mar 31 13:29:01 2022 Manar AmerFixedreportmechanics | lasers and optics | utilitiesOptical roomDust Cleaning of SBox

After an overnight where the cavity box was left open, a measurement of the Dust meter was taken:

Outside on the optical table on direct air flux (1701 p/m3 Av 10 min) and

Inside the cavity box (998 p/m3 Av 10 min)

The dust inside the cavity has decreased by ~ 30 % for 0.3 u particles.

Note: the cavity box is still open.

Manar Amer wrote:

The inside of the cavity was cleaned today. It was very dirty and had big dust particles and fibers inside.

Cleaning was done for everything; wall, floor, fixed mounts, wires (still have some dust difficult to remove), edges.

The dust meter average was measured outside the cavity (2471 p/m3 av 6 min)  and inside after cleaning (1424 p/m3 av 10 min).

The cavity was left open under the clean air flow, will observe it under UV, clean and measure Dust tomorrow.

Images attached are after cleaning.

Objects inside the cavity at the moment :

  • 4 main mirror mounts
  • 4 mirror fixers on mounts and 3 screws each (total 12)
  • 2 reflecting mirror mounts
  • 2 dielectric mirrors (mounted and to be cleaned)
  • two mounts for D-shaped mirrors.
  • 2 D-shaped mirrors (unmounted, and they will need cleaning)
  • 2 metal irises (pinholes)

 

Manar Amer wrote:

The cleaning was done twice with half an hour interval between the two times
reading on the dust meter was taken after each time, and it was zero averaged over a 10-min

Manar Amer wrote:

An Initial cleaning of the KBoX outside was done, All the optics and mechanics placed that were on the table were removed.

Only the old Mitylaser amplifier remains on the table.

Since we will be using the ThomX Celia amplifier, we will remove it and place it in a secure location (to be decided).

Tomorrow a cleaning of the inside of the cavity box is to be done.

 

 

 

Attachment 1: 20220331_Dust_Meter_Outside_cavity_Av10min.jpg
20220331_Dust_Meter_Outside_cavity_Av10min.jpg
Attachment 2: 20220331_Dust_Meter_Inside_cavity_Av10min.jpg
20220331_Dust_Meter_Inside_cavity_Av10min.jpg
  175   Thu Dec 7 09:30:03 2023 Ronic ChicheFixedinfomechanics | lasers and optics | detectors and electronics | softwareOptical roomnew setup for the 160MHz Menhir oscillator

from the begining of the week, Xinyi, Aurélien, Viktor and myself started to install a new setup for the Menhir 160MHz oscillator.
the goal is to rich a record power in the FP-cavity.

- the 160MHz Menhir oscillator has been injected in a fiber.
we reached ~ 25mV on 50ohms which is equivalent to 0.5mA in a DET10 photodiode.
=> ~1mW coupled in the fiber => it is not enough to put an EOM and an AOM before the amplifier.
=> one needs to improve the fiber injection.
in fact, I checked the power in the fiber with a powermeter, and it is ~16mW !
at this level of power, one needs to add some optical density before connecting to a photodiode, or it can be saturated.

- we calculated the mirrors position in the SBOX vessel to obtain a 160MHz FSR FP-cavity.
see in attached files, the calculations and scheme in the PPTX file and the Matlab code to get some results.

- we cleaned the optical table and verified with the dust counter that the SBOX environnement is clean.
the 2nd airflow box (from the entrance) seems more dusty (measureed directly close to the top) than the others.
we also opened the vessel and cleaned it.
see the dust measurement inside the SBOX.

- we checked the motors inside the vessel :
=> spherical and plan mirrors translation stage control with the ESP300.
the translation stage have been placed on the middle of their range.
=> the 2 D-shape mirrors translation stage control with PICOMOTORS controller Newport 8742.

- today, Viktor and Xinyi should start the installation of the mirrors mount and make some test to check if the beam is properly propagated inside the FP-cavity, before installing the final mirrors.
the mirror mounts are the Newport SU100TW-F2K zero-drift low waveform distortion : https://www.newport.com/p/SU100TW-F2K
they can accept mirrors with 6-6.35mm thickness => normally the SBOX mirrors from the LMA have a 6.35mm thickness.
see 1st file from this post : https://elog.lal.in2p3.fr/FPC/SBOX+commissioning/174

Attachment 1: Plan_SBOX_@_160MHz.pptx
Attachment 2: Implantation_disymmetric.m
clear
clc

% simulation parameters
c=299792458;            % light speed in vacuum
Frep=160.3084e6;        % laser repetition rate
D=0.07;                 % side distance between "output" windows of the vessel
DR=0.12;                % side distance between "input" windows of the vessel
L0=1.02;                % cavity box length
L3=0.505;               % distance between spherical mirrors

theta1=linspace(0.115,0.120,1e3);

% calculated parameters
Lrt=c/Frep;
theta2=2*atan(1./((Lrt/D)-1./tan(theta1/2)));
L2=D./sin(theta2);
L4=D./sin(theta1);
L1=Lrt-L2-L3-L4;

LM3=(DR-D)./tan(theta2);
LM2=L0-DR./tan(theta2);
LM1=L0-L1-LM2;
LM4=L0-L3-LM3;

id=LM1>0.15 & LM2>0.15 & LM3>0.15 & LM4>0.15 & abs(LM1-LM3)>0.08 & abs(LM2-LM4)>0.08;
L1(~id)=0;
L2(~id)=0;
L4(~id)=0;
LM1(~id)=0;
LM2(~id)=0;
LM3(~id)=0;
LM4(~id)=0;

figure(1)
clf
plot(theta1*1e3,L1)
hold on
plot(theta1*1e3,L2)
plot(theta1*1e3,L4)
plot(theta1*1e3,LM1)
plot(theta1*1e3,LM2)
plot(theta1*1e3,LM3)
plot(theta1*1e3,LM4)
grid on
legend('L1','L2','L4','LM1','LM2','LM3','LM4','location','best')
xlabel('theta1 angle (mrad)')
ylabel('length parameters (m)')

id=find(id~=0);
id=id(1);

disp(['LRT = ' num2str(Lrt) ' m'])
disp(['D = ' num2str(D*1e3) ' mm'])
disp(['theta1 = ' num2str(theta1(id)*1e3) ' mrad'])
disp(['theta2 = ' num2str(theta2(id)*1e3) ' mrad'])
disp(['L1 = ' num2str(L1(id)*1e3) ' mm'])
disp(['L2 = ' num2str(L2(id)*1e3) ' mm'])
disp(['L3 = ' num2str(L3*1e3) ' mm'])
disp(['L4 = ' num2str(L4(id)*1e3) ' mm'])
disp(' ')
disp(['L0 = ' num2str(L0) ' m'])
disp(['DR = ' num2str(DR*1e3) ' mm'])
disp(['LM1 = ' num2str(LM1(id)*1e3) ' mm'])
disp(['LM2 = ' num2str(LM2(id)*1e3) ' mm'])
disp(['LM3 = ' num2str(LM3(id)*1e3) ' mm'])
disp(['LM4 = ' num2str(LM4(id)*1e3) ' mm'])
disp(['LM3-LM1 = ' num2str((LM3(id)-LM1(id))*1e3) ' mm'])
disp(['LM2-LM4 = ' num2str((LM2(id)-LM4(id))*1e3) ' mm'])


Attachment 3: IMG_20210519_155329.jpg
IMG_20210519_155329.jpg
  99   Tue Jun 21 23:52:28 2022 Manar AmerFixedreportmechanics | lasers and optics | detectors and electronicsOptical roomMenhir Pulsed Laser

The SBox Length (FSR), was changed to match the repetition rate of the Menhir pulsed laser Frep = 216.6625 MHz

It was changed by removing the 2 D-shaped mirrors placed between M1 and M2, distance between M1-M2 ~= 169 mm 

it was still needed to be adjusted with M1 motor to reach the correct FSR.

The pulsed laser is placed on the able with injection into a fiber

The Finesse of the cavity has progressed from ~2500  to ~ 18 000

 

** Note: PowerPoint attached shows the progress over the last two weeks on the laser and 

Attachment 1: MENHIR_injection_into_fiber.jpg
MENHIR_injection_into_fiber.jpg
Attachment 2: SBox_M.jpg
SBox_M.jpg
Attachment 3: 20220620_SBox_MENHIR.pptx
  156   Fri Sep 9 18:35:07 2022 Ronic ChicheFixedinfomechanics | lasers and optics | detectors and electronicsOptical roomD-shape mirrors positionning status

This afternoon we opened the cavity and put the D-shape mirrors at their correct place, close to the beam.
we checked the relative position of the mirrors to the beam using the 2nd stage of the amplifier (<1W) and with the sensitive (and cleaned) orange optical card.
with this configuration, we can see very clearly the beam inside the cavity (~ 100µW) and we can check easily if the D-shape mirrors are correctly placed.

the motors used to move the D-shape are the Newport Picomotors 8303-V
with roughly 30nm/step sensitivity and 50mm of range (~1 600 000 steps)
the 4 axis controller used ot move these motors is the Newport 8742.

For both Vertical and Horizontal D-shape mirrors:
* when you do +N steps on the controller, you retract the D-shape mirror from the beam
* when you do -N steps on the controller, you push the D-shape mirror to the beam

the 0 position on the controller corresponds to the D-shape close to the beam.

now, the FP cavity is closed and pumped to go back to vacuum.

 

  157   Fri Sep 9 19:03:58 2022 Ronic ChicheFixedinfomechanics | lasers and optics | detectors and electronicsOptical roomD-shape mirrors positionning status

The cavity box is vacuum pumped at 6*10^-2 mbar.

Ronic Chiche wrote:

This afternoon we opened the cavity and put the D-shape mirrors at their correct place, close to the beam.
we checked the relative position of the mirrors to the beam using the 2nd stage of the amplifier (<1W) and with the sensitive (and cleaned) orange optical card.
with this configuration, we can see very clearly the beam inside the cavity (~ 100µW) and we can check easily if the D-shape mirrors are correctly placed.

the motors used to move the D-shape are the Newport Picomotors 8303-V
with roughly 30nm/step sensitivity and 50mm of range (~1 600 000 steps)
the 4 axis controller used ot move these motors is the Newport 8742.

For both Vertical and Horizontal D-shape mirrors:
* when you do +N steps on the controller, you retract the D-shape mirror from the beam
* when you do -N steps on the controller, you push the D-shape mirror to the beam

the 0 position on the controller corresponds to the D-shape close to the beam.

now, the FP cavity is closed and pumped to go back to vacuum.

 

 

  223   Wed Jun 19 10:38:00 2024 Ronic ChicheFixedinfomechanics | lasers and optics | detectors and electronicsOptical roomD-shape mirrors positionning status

summary:

- the motors used to move the D-shape are the Newport Picomotors 8303-V
the sensitivity is roughly 30nm/step
the range is 1 600 000 steps or 50mm

- the 4 axis controller used ot move these motors is the Newport 8742.
channel 1 is for the vertical D-shape
channel 2 is for the horizontal D-shape
+N steps on the controller, you retract the D-shape mirror from the beam
-N steps on the controller, you push the D-shape mirror to the beam

the 0 position, vertically and horizontally is close to the beam.
the stand position is at ~ +200 000 steps in both directions.

 

Ronic Chiche wrote:

The cavity box is vacuum pumped at 6*10^-2 mbar.

Ronic Chiche wrote:

This afternoon we opened the cavity and put the D-shape mirrors at their correct place, close to the beam.
we checked the relative position of the mirrors to the beam using the 2nd stage of the amplifier (<1W) and with the sensitive (and cleaned) orange optical card.
with this configuration, we can see very clearly the beam inside the cavity (~ 100µW) and we can check easily if the D-shape mirrors are correctly placed.

the motors used to move the D-shape are the Newport Picomotors 8303-V
with roughly 30nm/step sensitivity and 50mm of range (~1 600 000 steps)
the 4 axis controller used ot move these motors is the Newport 8742.

For both Vertical and Horizontal D-shape mirrors:
* when you do +N steps on the controller, you retract the D-shape mirror from the beam
* when you do -N steps on the controller, you push the D-shape mirror to the beam

the 0 position on the controller corresponds to the D-shape close to the beam.

now, the FP cavity is closed and pumped to go back to vacuum.

 

 

 

  238   Mon Jun 23 14:38:33 2025 Ronic ChicheUnder Processissuemechanics | lasers and optics | detectors and electronicsOptical roomfirst attempt to lock

With Alice, we installed the EOWaves oscillator to be locked on the FP-cavity (T1 ~ 2500ppm, T2 ~ 10ppm => F ~ 2500)
FSR = 216MHz => LW = 86kHz.

We installed the PDH box, and we got some error signal, but the shape of the transmission signal and error signal is a bit strange...
It grows smoothly, and when the power is large enough, one can see a sudden and fast drop.
Could it be some mechanical problem with the mirrors' mounts ?
I opened the SBOX this morning to do some inspection, and the mirrors seem properly installed in the mounts.

In some rare cases (last picture), the "instability" effect is not dominant, and we are able to maintain a quasi-lock during some 1- 2ms.
But it is still impossible to lock the cavity.

(We did a test with a vacuum in the SBOX at ~2mbar, but the problem is the same.)

Attachment 1: 20250623_123816.jpg
20250623_123816.jpg
Attachment 2: 20250623_123833.jpg
20250623_123833.jpg
Attachment 3: 20250623_123908.jpg
20250623_123908.jpg
  7   Thu Oct 18 09:42:39 2018 Loïc AmoudryFixedreportmechanics | lasers and opticsOptical roomMotors for D-shaped mirrors

Motors have been installed on 16/10/18. No problem with them.

Effect of the motors tested on 17/10/18. No improvement. But they give the possibility to perfectly cut HOM or let them go through as show the following picture of a 2.2 mode at ~340 mW in trans and 70% coupling @4A.

Attachment 1: tek00000.png
tek00000.png
Attachment 2: tek0000CH1.isf
Attachment 3: tek0000CH2.isf
Attachment 4: tek0000CH3.isf
Attachment 5: tek0000CH4.isf
  11   Wed Oct 31 11:27:49 2018 Loïc AmoudryFixedreportmechanics | lasers and opticsOptical roomPower measurement with D-shape

Measurements of lot of points with D-shape mirrors well positionned.

Power not optimized to the best but almost. (@4A could have 350 mW).

I (A) Ptrans (mW)  Coupling (%)

0

8 62
1 18 67
1.3 43 72
1.6 76 72
1.9 112 72
2.2 145 72
2.5 177 72
2.8 217 72
3.1 253 72
3.4 281 72
3.7 300 72
4 323 71
4.3 249 71
4.6 379 68
4.9 402 68
5.2 417 67
5.5 435 67
5.8 441 65

 

  232   Tue Mar 4 18:51:57 2025 Ronic ChicheUnder Processinfomechanics | lasers and opticsOptical roomAlignment of a 2-mirror FP cavity

today with Alice,

- we measured the height of the SBOX windows center : 140mm from the optical table.
- we set the laser fiber colimator exactly at this height.
- we placed 2 mirrors to align the future telescope path at exactly 140mm height along the whole possible travel of the lenses in order to keep them aligned.
the horizontal position is also aligned on this path and a ruler has been placed along this path to help to move the future telescope lenses without misalignment.
- we aligned 2 iris on this path to keep this path axis in case of misalignment.
- we placed 2 iris at the center of the input and output FP-cavity windows.
- we precisely aligned the laser beam on these iris.

in the next days, we need to align the mounts in the SBOX and align also the 2 FP-cavity mirrors.
the output mirror will be a "bad" ThomX 2.24m ROC ULE mirror and the input mirror will be a plan 460ppm Gamma Factory mirror.

  233   Fri Mar 21 18:27:36 2025 Alice RenauxUnder Processreportmechanics | lasers and opticsOptical room2-mirror cavity alignment

At the beginning of the week, I installed a half-wave plate, a beamsplitter cube and a quarter-wave plate, as well as the end-of-cavity mirror, which I unsuccessfully tried to align.

I removed the end-of-cavity mirror and started the laser injection over again with the two motorized mirrors placed in front of the vacuum chamber (but left Ronic's setup as it was).

Today, I aligned the laser by putting an iris on the cavity mirrors' mounts. I tested the repeatability of such a setup, both by removing and putting back the same iris and by using a different iris. The result is in the attached pictures. Is it good enough ?

The mirrors' motors positions are :

- 1 : 3.349670 mm ;

- 3 : 2.060280 mm ;

- 4 : 3.484560 mm ;

- 5 : 3.269710 mm.

Attachment 1: 2-mirror_cavity_alignment.zip
ELOG V3.1.4-395e101