HOME SBOX THOMX MINICAV Utilities
SBOX orders SBOX installation SBOX commissioning SBOX control command
  Status of commissioning, report also here plots are reports., Page 3 of 13  Not logged in ELOG logo
ID Date Author Status Type Category Location Titledown
  104   Wed Jul 6 18:39:25 2022 Manar AmerFixedreportlasers and optics | vacuumOptical roomSBox Finesse at 216.6625 MHz

Max Finesse obtained @ 4 mirror setup was ~ 19 300 

With M1 from ThomX , M2/M3/M4 from SBox

Manar Amer wrote:

The Sbox currently has the injection from ThomX installed T ~ 120 ppm , M2 planar from Sbox spare and M3 / M4 spherical mirrors from Sbox installed.

The last finesse measurement that was done gave a Finesse of ~ 19300 (After cleaning M2 using ethanol + aceton + pure water)

on Friday the whole optical table was cleaned again and the inside of the box was cleaned (even with a lot of dust inside the box the Finesse was 19300 )

all the mirrors were cleaned after using the three steps, M3 and M4 had clear visible dust on them.

D-shaped mirrors were installed again between M1 and M2

The alignment was redone and the beating observed ,  There is still a need for alignment improvement.

the cavity is under vacuum ~ 4.8*10^-2 mbar on Friday evening (~ 19h00) , The cavity is yet to be locked and to measure its Finesse

A PowerPoint showing the last finesse measurement and the error signal of the menhir laser lock

 

 

 

  105   Wed Jul 6 18:39:38 2022 Manar AmerFixedreportlasers and optics | vacuumOptical roomSBox Finesse at 216.6625 MHz

 

Manar Amer wrote:

Max Finesse obtained @ 4 mirror setup was ~ 19 300 

With M1 from ThomX , M2/M3/M4 from SBox

Manar Amer wrote:

The Sbox currently has the injection from ThomX installed T ~ 120 ppm , M2 planar from Sbox spare and M3 / M4 spherical mirrors from Sbox installed.

The last finesse measurement that was done gave a Finesse of ~ 19300 (After cleaning M2 using ethanol + aceton + pure water)

on Friday the whole optical table was cleaned again and the inside of the box was cleaned (even with a lot of dust inside the box the Finesse was 19300 )

all the mirrors were cleaned after using the three steps, M3 and M4 had clear visible dust on them.

D-shaped mirrors were installed again between M1 and M2

The alignment was redone and the beating observed ,  There is still a need for alignment improvement.

the cavity is under vacuum ~ 4.8*10^-2 mbar on Friday evening (~ 19h00) , The cavity is yet to be locked and to measure its Finesse

A PowerPoint showing the last finesse measurement and the error signal of the menhir laser lock

 

 

 

 

  77   Mon Apr 25 17:28:29 2022 Manar AmerFixedreportlasers and opticsOptical roomSBox Alignment

SBox alignment, using CW laser Koheras power 1 mW

  • Finished M1 and M2 alignment using the diffraction patterns seen on the beam profiler,  the beam fit is not very good ?? (image taken)
  • Positions of Ma1 and Ma2 motors are registered (image taken)
  • Placed Fixed 2 irises at M1 window and M2 window (Image taken while both are closed)
  • Distance between the collimator and beam profiler ~ 2 m
  • Distance between collimator and M1 diaphragm   ~ 1 m
  • Distance between collimator and M2 diaphragm ~ 1.6 m 

 

Manar Amer wrote:

Starting with the alignment of the KBox using CW Koheras.

The size of the CW output from the collimator at 1 meter from is ~ 2.4 mm, to be adjusted with lenses to match the cavity !!! (attached image)

For the 2 alignment mirrors, I am only able to control 3 axes for now (motor issue for the fourth to be fixed !!) , Horizontal and vertical for Ma1 and Horizontal for Ma2(closes to injection window).

Started with only irises placed on both the M1 and M2. Placed a beam profiler at the window behind M2 to observe an output beam.

Motors position for the 3 axes and beam shape and position after M2 attached.

 

Attachment 1: SBox_Setup.jpg
SBox_Setup.jpg
Attachment 2: Ma1_Ma2_Horizontal_Position.png
Ma1_Ma2_Horizontal_Position.png
Attachment 3: Ma1_Ma2_Vertical_Position.png
Ma1_Ma2_Vertical_Position.png
Attachment 4: Output_afterM2_Diaghragm_On_M1_M2_Beam.jpg
Output_afterM2_Diaghragm_On_M1_M2_Beam.jpg
Attachment 5: Output_afterM2_Diaghragm_On_M1_M2_BeamFit.png
Output_afterM2_Diaghragm_On_M1_M2_BeamFit.png
Attachment 6: Output_afterM2_Diaghragm_On_M1_M2_Beam_Outside_Irises_Installed_and_Closed.jpg
Output_afterM2_Diaghragm_On_M1_M2_Beam_Outside_Irises_Installed_and_Closed.jpg
  78   Mon Apr 25 17:58:01 2022 Manar AmerFixedreportlasers and opticsOptical roomSBox Alignment

After pointers and Advice from Aurélien,

improvement of the beam alignment through M1 and M2 irises was done.

To improve the image on the beam profiler, I cleaned the alignment mirrors and the windows using pure ethanol and optical lens cleaning tissue,

a significant improvement after cleaning the inside of M2 Window. Images have less dust diffraction rings.

Attached new images of the beam:

  • New Ma1 and Ma2 motor position
  • After M1 pinhole optimized (saturated)
  • After M2 and M1 pinhole optimizing (saturated and not)
Manar Amer wrote:

SBox alignment, using CW laser Koheras power 1 mW

  • Finished M1 and M2 alignment using the diffraction patterns seen on the beam profiler,  the beam fit is not very good ?? (image taken)
  • Positions of Ma1 and Ma2 motors are registered (image taken)
  • Placed Fixed 2 irises at M1 window and M2 window (Image taken while both are closed)
  • Distance between the collimator and beam profiler ~ 2 m
  • Distance between collimator and M1 diaphragm   ~ 1 m
  • Distance between collimator and M2 diaphragm ~ 1.6 m 

 

Manar Amer wrote:

Starting with the alignment of the KBox using CW Koheras.

The size of the CW output from the collimator at 1 meter from is ~ 2.4 mm, to be adjusted with lenses to match the cavity !!! (attached image)

For the 2 alignment mirrors, I am only able to control 3 axes for now (motor issue for the fourth to be fixed !!) , Horizontal and vertical for Ma1 and Horizontal for Ma2(closes to injection window).

Started with only irises placed on both the M1 and M2. Placed a beam profiler at the window behind M2 to observe an output beam.

Motors position for the 3 axes and beam shape and position after M2 attached.

 

 

Attachment 1: Ma1_Ma2_Horizontal_Position_Optimized.png
Ma1_Ma2_Horizontal_Position_Optimized.png
Attachment 2: Ma1_Ma2_Vertical_Position_Optimized.png
Ma1_Ma2_Vertical_Position_Optimized.png
Attachment 3: After_M1_diaphram_1m_Saturated_Beam_Optimized.jpg
After_M1_diaphram_1m_Saturated_Beam_Optimized.jpg
Attachment 4: After_M2_M1_diaphram_Saturated_Beam_Optimized.jpg
After_M2_M1_diaphram_Saturated_Beam_Optimized.jpg
Attachment 5: After_M2_M1_diaphram_Beam_Optimized.jpg
After_M2_M1_diaphram_Beam_Optimized.jpg
  79   Mon Apr 25 18:02:09 2022 Manar AmerFixedreportlasers and opticsOptical roomSBox Alignment

Remember to update the position of the reference Irises tomorrow !!!!

Manar Amer wrote:

After pointers and Advice from Aurélien,

improvement of the beam alignment through M1 and M2 irises was done.

To improve the image on the beam profiler, I cleaned the alignment mirrors and the windows using pure ethanol and optical lens cleaning tissue,

a significant improvement after cleaning the inside of M2 Window. Images have less dust diffraction rings.

Attached new images of the beam:

  • New Ma1 and Ma2 motor position
  • After M1 pinhole optimized (saturated)
  • After M2 and M1 pinhole optimizing (saturated and not)
Manar Amer wrote:

SBox alignment, using CW laser Koheras power 1 mW

  • Finished M1 and M2 alignment using the diffraction patterns seen on the beam profiler,  the beam fit is not very good ?? (image taken)
  • Positions of Ma1 and Ma2 motors are registered (image taken)
  • Placed Fixed 2 irises at M1 window and M2 window (Image taken while both are closed)
  • Distance between the collimator and beam profiler ~ 2 m
  • Distance between collimator and M1 diaphragm   ~ 1 m
  • Distance between collimator and M2 diaphragm ~ 1.6 m 

 

Manar Amer wrote:

Starting with the alignment of the KBox using CW Koheras.

The size of the CW output from the collimator at 1 meter from is ~ 2.4 mm, to be adjusted with lenses to match the cavity !!! (attached image)

For the 2 alignment mirrors, I am only able to control 3 axes for now (motor issue for the fourth to be fixed !!) , Horizontal and vertical for Ma1 and Horizontal for Ma2(closes to injection window).

Started with only irises placed on both the M1 and M2. Placed a beam profiler at the window behind M2 to observe an output beam.

Motors position for the 3 axes and beam shape and position after M2 attached.

 

 

 

  80   Tue Apr 26 20:08:10 2022 Manar AmerFixedreportlasers and opticsOptical roomSBox Alignment
  • Adjust the placement of the Irises  (done at the start of the day, adjusted at the end when M1 mirror was placed)
  • Improvement on the Ma1 and Ma2 (The Alignment Mirrors)
    • Improves the alignment a bit. There is an observation where there is no symmetry in the image, concluded to be because of the pinholes that are usually used for the alignment the circle cut is not symmetric (took images on phone of pinholes)
    • This explains why, for the pinhole used on M1, we see a little more symmetry than the pinhole used on M2. 
    •  
    • Placed M1 mirror from Sbox (with damage spot in the middle), after cleaning it using the spincoater, only used to adjust the injection into the mirror where it will give Horizontal displacement due to the thickness of the mirror.
    • Last position of the motors attached
  • Installed the 2 dielectric mirrors for the reflection line
  • Did a rough alignment for the reflection line to have it exit through the reflection window.

Note about mirrors : They were cleaned a year a go and placed in the boxes. When opened the box and seen under microscope they were very dirty with dust particle 

Specially from the back, I believe the boxes have dust in them (to be verified under the UV light /  Microscope  !!!!!!!! )

 

Manar Amer wrote:

Remember to update the position of the reference Irises tomorrow !!!!

Manar Amer wrote:

After pointers and Advice from Aurélien,

improvement of the beam alignment through M1 and M2 irises was done.

To improve the image on the beam profiler, I cleaned the alignment mirrors and the windows using pure ethanol and optical lens cleaning tissue,

a significant improvement after cleaning the inside of M2 Window. Images have less dust diffraction rings.

Attached new images of the beam:

  • New Ma1 and Ma2 motor position
  • After M1 pinhole optimized (saturated)
  • After M2 and M1 pinhole optimizing (saturated and not)
Manar Amer wrote:

SBox alignment, using CW laser Koheras power 1 mW

  • Finished M1 and M2 alignment using the diffraction patterns seen on the beam profiler,  the beam fit is not very good ?? (image taken)
  • Positions of Ma1 and Ma2 motors are registered (image taken)
  • Placed Fixed 2 irises at M1 window and M2 window (Image taken while both are closed)
  • Distance between the collimator and beam profiler ~ 2 m
  • Distance between collimator and M1 diaphragm   ~ 1 m
  • Distance between collimator and M2 diaphragm ~ 1.6 m 

 

Manar Amer wrote:

Starting with the alignment of the KBox using CW Koheras.

The size of the CW output from the collimator at 1 meter from is ~ 2.4 mm, to be adjusted with lenses to match the cavity !!! (attached image)

For the 2 alignment mirrors, I am only able to control 3 axes for now (motor issue for the fourth to be fixed !!) , Horizontal and vertical for Ma1 and Horizontal for Ma2(closes to injection window).

Started with only irises placed on both the M1 and M2. Placed a beam profiler at the window behind M2 to observe an output beam.

Motors position for the 3 axes and beam shape and position after M2 attached.

 

 

 

 

Attachment 1: Pinhole_One.jpg
Pinhole_One.jpg
Attachment 2: Pinhole_Two.jpg
Pinhole_Two.jpg
Attachment 3: After_M1_diaphram_Saturated_Beam_Optimized.jpg
After_M1_diaphram_Saturated_Beam_Optimized.jpg
Attachment 4: After_M2_diaphram_Saturated_Beam_Optimized.jpg
After_M2_diaphram_Saturated_Beam_Optimized.jpg
Attachment 5: both_diaphrams_M1_M2.jpg
both_diaphrams_M1_M2.jpg
Attachment 6: both_diaphrams_M1_M2_Optimized.jpg
both_diaphrams_M1_M2_Optimized.jpg
Attachment 7: After_M2_diaphram_M1_Mirror_Installed_SBox_Saturated_Beam_Optimized.jpg
After_M2_diaphram_M1_Mirror_Installed_SBox_Saturated_Beam_Optimized.jpg
Attachment 8: Ma1_Ma2_Horizontal_Position_Optimized_M1_Mirror_Installes_SBox.png
Ma1_Ma2_Horizontal_Position_Optimized_M1_Mirror_Installes_SBox.png
Attachment 9: Ma1_Ma2_Vertical_Position_Optimized_M1_Mirror_Installes_SBox.png
Ma1_Ma2_Vertical_Position_Optimized_M1_Mirror_Installes_SBox.png
  81   Wed Apr 27 22:13:37 2022 Manar AmerFixedreportlasers and opticsOptical roomSBox Alignment

Finished the alignment of the SBox with M1 of SBox placed, to be changed to gamma factory mirror later

Observed what seems to be transmission through M2 mirror, to be confirmed. image attached shows it

a PowerPoint attached showing the details of today's work.

 

 

Manar Amer wrote:
  • Adjust the placement of the Irises  (done at the start of the day, adjusted at the end when M1 mirror was placed)
  • Improvement on the Ma1 and Ma2 (The Alignment Mirrors)
    • Improves the alignment a bit. There is an observation where there is no symmetry in the image, concluded to be because of the pinholes that are usually used for the alignment the circle cut is not symmetric (took images on phone of pinholes)
    • This explains why, for the pinhole used on M1, we see a little more symmetry than the pinhole used on M2. 
    •  
    • Placed M1 mirror from Sbox (with damage spot in the middle), after cleaning it using the spincoater, only used to adjust the injection into the mirror where it will give Horizontal displacement due to the thickness of the mirror.
    • Last position of the motors attached
  • Installed the 2 dielectric mirrors for the reflection line
  • Did a rough alignment for the reflection line to have it exit through the reflection window.

Note about mirrors : They were cleaned a year a go and placed in the boxes. When opened the box and seen under microscope they were very dirty with dust particle 

Specially from the back, I believe the boxes have dust in them (to be verified under the UV light /  Microscope  !!!!!!!! )

 

Manar Amer wrote:

Remember to update the position of the reference Irises tomorrow !!!!

Manar Amer wrote:

After pointers and Advice from Aurélien,

improvement of the beam alignment through M1 and M2 irises was done.

To improve the image on the beam profiler, I cleaned the alignment mirrors and the windows using pure ethanol and optical lens cleaning tissue,

a significant improvement after cleaning the inside of M2 Window. Images have less dust diffraction rings.

Attached new images of the beam:

  • New Ma1 and Ma2 motor position
  • After M1 pinhole optimized (saturated)
  • After M2 and M1 pinhole optimizing (saturated and not)
Manar Amer wrote:

SBox alignment, using CW laser Koheras power 1 mW

  • Finished M1 and M2 alignment using the diffraction patterns seen on the beam profiler,  the beam fit is not very good ?? (image taken)
  • Positions of Ma1 and Ma2 motors are registered (image taken)
  • Placed Fixed 2 irises at M1 window and M2 window (Image taken while both are closed)
  • Distance between the collimator and beam profiler ~ 2 m
  • Distance between collimator and M1 diaphragm   ~ 1 m
  • Distance between collimator and M2 diaphragm ~ 1.6 m 

 

Manar Amer wrote:

Starting with the alignment of the KBox using CW Koheras.

The size of the CW output from the collimator at 1 meter from is ~ 2.4 mm, to be adjusted with lenses to match the cavity !!! (attached image)

For the 2 alignment mirrors, I am only able to control 3 axes for now (motor issue for the fourth to be fixed !!) , Horizontal and vertical for Ma1 and Horizontal for Ma2(closes to injection window).

Started with only irises placed on both the M1 and M2. Placed a beam profiler at the window behind M2 to observe an output beam.

Motors position for the 3 axes and beam shape and position after M2 attached.

 

 

 

 

 

Attachment 1: all_mirrorsplaced_after_m2_window.jpg
all_mirrorsplaced_after_m2_window.jpg
Attachment 2: 20222704_SBox_alignment.pptx
  83   Mon May 9 18:36:48 2022 Manar AmerFixedreportlasers and opticsOptical roomSBox Alignment

Last week In FP cavity we had all SBox mirrors including the damaged M1 mirror.

The beating was observed with just a slight adjustment on M4 alignment.

In addition, it was also observed while driving the piezo of the CW laser.

In the attached image of the beam at transmission point at M2 mirror, the shape of the beam is deformed.

one of the factors could be related to the damaged spot on M1 mirror. The deformation position can also be seen in the higher order modes.

after changing the injection mirror to Gamma factory M1, this deformation should disappear.

Manar Amer wrote:

Finished the alignment of the SBox with M1 of SBox placed, to be changed to gamma factory mirror later

Observed what seems to be transmission through M2 mirror, to be confirmed. image attached shows it

a PowerPoint attached showing the details of today's work.

 

 

Manar Amer wrote:
  • Adjust the placement of the Irises  (done at the start of the day, adjusted at the end when M1 mirror was placed)
  • Improvement on the Ma1 and Ma2 (The Alignment Mirrors)
    • Improves the alignment a bit. There is an observation where there is no symmetry in the image, concluded to be because of the pinholes that are usually used for the alignment the circle cut is not symmetric (took images on phone of pinholes)
    • This explains why, for the pinhole used on M1, we see a little more symmetry than the pinhole used on M2. 
    •  
    • Placed M1 mirror from Sbox (with damage spot in the middle), after cleaning it using the spincoater, only used to adjust the injection into the mirror where it will give Horizontal displacement due to the thickness of the mirror.
    • Last position of the motors attached
  • Installed the 2 dielectric mirrors for the reflection line
  • Did a rough alignment for the reflection line to have it exit through the reflection window.

Note about mirrors : They were cleaned a year a go and placed in the boxes. When opened the box and seen under microscope they were very dirty with dust particle 

Specially from the back, I believe the boxes have dust in them (to be verified under the UV light /  Microscope  !!!!!!!! )

 

Manar Amer wrote:

Remember to update the position of the reference Irises tomorrow !!!!

Manar Amer wrote:

After pointers and Advice from Aurélien,

improvement of the beam alignment through M1 and M2 irises was done.

To improve the image on the beam profiler, I cleaned the alignment mirrors and the windows using pure ethanol and optical lens cleaning tissue,

a significant improvement after cleaning the inside of M2 Window. Images have less dust diffraction rings.

Attached new images of the beam:

  • New Ma1 and Ma2 motor position
  • After M1 pinhole optimized (saturated)
  • After M2 and M1 pinhole optimizing (saturated and not)
Manar Amer wrote:

SBox alignment, using CW laser Koheras power 1 mW

  • Finished M1 and M2 alignment using the diffraction patterns seen on the beam profiler,  the beam fit is not very good ?? (image taken)
  • Positions of Ma1 and Ma2 motors are registered (image taken)
  • Placed Fixed 2 irises at M1 window and M2 window (Image taken while both are closed)
  • Distance between the collimator and beam profiler ~ 2 m
  • Distance between collimator and M1 diaphragm   ~ 1 m
  • Distance between collimator and M2 diaphragm ~ 1.6 m 

 

Manar Amer wrote:

Starting with the alignment of the KBox using CW Koheras.

The size of the CW output from the collimator at 1 meter from is ~ 2.4 mm, to be adjusted with lenses to match the cavity !!! (attached image)

For the 2 alignment mirrors, I am only able to control 3 axes for now (motor issue for the fourth to be fixed !!) , Horizontal and vertical for Ma1 and Horizontal for Ma2(closes to injection window).

Started with only irises placed on both the M1 and M2. Placed a beam profiler at the window behind M2 to observe an output beam.

Motors position for the 3 axes and beam shape and position after M2 attached.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Attachment 1: Beating_TM00_SBox_damaged_M1.jpg
Beating_TM00_SBox_damaged_M1.jpg
Attachment 2: Beating_HigherOrder_SBox_damaged_M1.jpg
Beating_HigherOrder_SBox_damaged_M1.jpg
  84   Mon May 9 19:05:35 2022 Manar AmerFixedreportlasers and opticsOptical roomSBox Alignment

Today; replaced the M1 SBox mirror with M1 from gamma factory , following the previous alignment.

Removed all mirrors and cleaned them one by one.

Started with no M1, placed M2 did its alignment through M3 pinhole, then placed M3 aligned it through M4 pinhole, then placed M4 aligned it through M1 pinhole.

Placed M1 Gamma factory at the end

Note: mirror is new was not used before, took image on microscope there was no dust in the center, but there was little on the edges (cleaned it using spin-coater)

beating of fundamental mode observed (at M2 transmission) immediately with very higher order modes, slight adjustment on M4 suppressed them.

The beam is not circular and still has some deformation, M1 was changed, so it could be a damaged point at one of the other mirrors (to be investigated tomorrow)!!

No significant damage seen on the other mirrors.

 

 

Manar Amer wrote:

Last week In FP cavity we had all SBox mirrors including the damaged M1 mirror.

The beating was observed with just a slight adjustment on M4 alignment.

In addition, it was also observed while driving the piezo of the CW laser.

In the attached image of the beam at transmission point at M2 mirror, the shape of the beam is deformed.

one of the factors could be related to the damaged spot on M1 mirror. The deformation position can also be seen in the higher order modes.

after changing the injection mirror to Gamma factory M1, this deformation should disappear.

Manar Amer wrote:

Finished the alignment of the SBox with M1 of SBox placed, to be changed to gamma factory mirror later

Observed what seems to be transmission through M2 mirror, to be confirmed. image attached shows it

a PowerPoint attached showing the details of today's work.

 

 

Manar Amer wrote:
  • Adjust the placement of the Irises  (done at the start of the day, adjusted at the end when M1 mirror was placed)
  • Improvement on the Ma1 and Ma2 (The Alignment Mirrors)
    • Improves the alignment a bit. There is an observation where there is no symmetry in the image, concluded to be because of the pinholes that are usually used for the alignment the circle cut is not symmetric (took images on phone of pinholes)
    • This explains why, for the pinhole used on M1, we see a little more symmetry than the pinhole used on M2. 
    •  
    • Placed M1 mirror from Sbox (with damage spot in the middle), after cleaning it using the spincoater, only used to adjust the injection into the mirror where it will give Horizontal displacement due to the thickness of the mirror.
    • Last position of the motors attached
  • Installed the 2 dielectric mirrors for the reflection line
  • Did a rough alignment for the reflection line to have it exit through the reflection window.

Note about mirrors : They were cleaned a year a go and placed in the boxes. When opened the box and seen under microscope they were very dirty with dust particle 

Specially from the back, I believe the boxes have dust in them (to be verified under the UV light /  Microscope  !!!!!!!! )

 

Manar Amer wrote:

Remember to update the position of the reference Irises tomorrow !!!!

Manar Amer wrote:

After pointers and Advice from Aurélien,

improvement of the beam alignment through M1 and M2 irises was done.

To improve the image on the beam profiler, I cleaned the alignment mirrors and the windows using pure ethanol and optical lens cleaning tissue,

a significant improvement after cleaning the inside of M2 Window. Images have less dust diffraction rings.

Attached new images of the beam:

  • New Ma1 and Ma2 motor position
  • After M1 pinhole optimized (saturated)
  • After M2 and M1 pinhole optimizing (saturated and not)
Manar Amer wrote:

SBox alignment, using CW laser Koheras power 1 mW

  • Finished M1 and M2 alignment using the diffraction patterns seen on the beam profiler,  the beam fit is not very good ?? (image taken)
  • Positions of Ma1 and Ma2 motors are registered (image taken)
  • Placed Fixed 2 irises at M1 window and M2 window (Image taken while both are closed)
  • Distance between the collimator and beam profiler ~ 2 m
  • Distance between collimator and M1 diaphragm   ~ 1 m
  • Distance between collimator and M2 diaphragm ~ 1.6 m 

 

Manar Amer wrote:

Starting with the alignment of the KBox using CW Koheras.

The size of the CW output from the collimator at 1 meter from is ~ 2.4 mm, to be adjusted with lenses to match the cavity !!! (attached image)

For the 2 alignment mirrors, I am only able to control 3 axes for now (motor issue for the fourth to be fixed !!) , Horizontal and vertical for Ma1 and Horizontal for Ma2(closes to injection window).

Started with only irises placed on both the M1 and M2. Placed a beam profiler at the window behind M2 to observe an output beam.

Motors position for the 3 axes and beam shape and position after M2 attached.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Attachment 1: M2_alignment_M3_pinhole.jpg
M2_alignment_M3_pinhole.jpg
Attachment 2: M3_alignment_M4_pinhole.jpg
M3_alignment_M4_pinhole.jpg
Attachment 3: M4_alignment_M1_pinhole.jpg
M4_alignment_M1_pinhole.jpg
Attachment 4: Beating_TM00_CW_piezo_drive.jpg
Beating_TM00_CW_piezo_drive.jpg
  86   Wed May 11 09:19:48 2022 Manar AmerFixedreportlasers and opticsOptical roomSBox Alignment

Yesterday, to find the source of why the mode is deformed, I tried to rotate the mirrors to see if there is a change.

I started with M2 and rotated it by ~ 90 degrees, there is a change in the shape of the beam.(image attached)

Will see if changing M2 to the spare M2 from SBox can fix the issue.

At the end of the day, alignment was lost.

will be redone today while changing M2 mirror.

Manar Amer wrote:

Today; replaced the M1 SBox mirror with M1 from gamma factory , following the previous alignment.

Removed all mirrors and cleaned them one by one.

Started with no M1, placed M2 did its alignment through M3 pinhole, then placed M3 aligned it through M4 pinhole, then placed M4 aligned it through M1 pinhole.

Placed M1 Gamma factory at the end

Note: mirror is new was not used before, took image on microscope there was no dust in the center, but there was little on the edges (cleaned it using spin-coater)

beating of fundamental mode observed (at M2 transmission) immediately with very higher order modes, slight adjustment on M4 suppressed them.

The beam is not circular and still has some deformation, M1 was changed, so it could be a damaged point at one of the other mirrors (to be investigated tomorrow)!!

No significant damage seen on the other mirrors.

 

 

Manar Amer wrote:

Last week In FP cavity we had all SBox mirrors including the damaged M1 mirror.

The beating was observed with just a slight adjustment on M4 alignment.

In addition, it was also observed while driving the piezo of the CW laser.

In the attached image of the beam at transmission point at M2 mirror, the shape of the beam is deformed.

one of the factors could be related to the damaged spot on M1 mirror. The deformation position can also be seen in the higher order modes.

after changing the injection mirror to Gamma factory M1, this deformation should disappear.

Manar Amer wrote:

Finished the alignment of the SBox with M1 of SBox placed, to be changed to gamma factory mirror later

Observed what seems to be transmission through M2 mirror, to be confirmed. image attached shows it

a PowerPoint attached showing the details of today's work.

 

 

Manar Amer wrote:
  • Adjust the placement of the Irises  (done at the start of the day, adjusted at the end when M1 mirror was placed)
  • Improvement on the Ma1 and Ma2 (The Alignment Mirrors)
    • Improves the alignment a bit. There is an observation where there is no symmetry in the image, concluded to be because of the pinholes that are usually used for the alignment the circle cut is not symmetric (took images on phone of pinholes)
    • This explains why, for the pinhole used on M1, we see a little more symmetry than the pinhole used on M2. 
    •  
    • Placed M1 mirror from Sbox (with damage spot in the middle), after cleaning it using the spincoater, only used to adjust the injection into the mirror where it will give Horizontal displacement due to the thickness of the mirror.
    • Last position of the motors attached
  • Installed the 2 dielectric mirrors for the reflection line
  • Did a rough alignment for the reflection line to have it exit through the reflection window.

Note about mirrors : They were cleaned a year a go and placed in the boxes. When opened the box and seen under microscope they were very dirty with dust particle 

Specially from the back, I believe the boxes have dust in them (to be verified under the UV light /  Microscope  !!!!!!!! )

 

Manar Amer wrote:

Remember to update the position of the reference Irises tomorrow !!!!

Manar Amer wrote:

After pointers and Advice from Aurélien,

improvement of the beam alignment through M1 and M2 irises was done.

To improve the image on the beam profiler, I cleaned the alignment mirrors and the windows using pure ethanol and optical lens cleaning tissue,

a significant improvement after cleaning the inside of M2 Window. Images have less dust diffraction rings.

Attached new images of the beam:

  • New Ma1 and Ma2 motor position
  • After M1 pinhole optimized (saturated)
  • After M2 and M1 pinhole optimizing (saturated and not)
Manar Amer wrote:

SBox alignment, using CW laser Koheras power 1 mW

  • Finished M1 and M2 alignment using the diffraction patterns seen on the beam profiler,  the beam fit is not very good ?? (image taken)
  • Positions of Ma1 and Ma2 motors are registered (image taken)
  • Placed Fixed 2 irises at M1 window and M2 window (Image taken while both are closed)
  • Distance between the collimator and beam profiler ~ 2 m
  • Distance between collimator and M1 diaphragm   ~ 1 m
  • Distance between collimator and M2 diaphragm ~ 1.6 m 

 

Manar Amer wrote:

Starting with the alignment of the KBox using CW Koheras.

The size of the CW output from the collimator at 1 meter from is ~ 2.4 mm, to be adjusted with lenses to match the cavity !!! (attached image)

For the 2 alignment mirrors, I am only able to control 3 axes for now (motor issue for the fourth to be fixed !!) , Horizontal and vertical for Ma1 and Horizontal for Ma2(closes to injection window).

Started with only irises placed on both the M1 and M2. Placed a beam profiler at the window behind M2 to observe an output beam.

Motors position for the 3 axes and beam shape and position after M2 attached.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Attachment 1: Beating00_after_rotatingM2_2.jpg
Beating00_after_rotatingM2_2.jpg
  88   Wed May 11 21:10:27 2022 Manar AmerFixedreportlasers and opticsOptical roomSBox Alignment

M2 Sbox changed to spare. Alignment of M2 was redone. 

With the help of Ronic , We observe fundamental mode of the cavity with higher order modes. A frequency scan on the piezo was done to find the beating frequency , the shape is elliptical with no clear deformation.

The beam seems to be hitting something, which causes a reflection seen on the beam profiler.

We started a slow scan to improvement of the outside alignment.

At the end of the day, I can only get the TM01 and TM10 modes,

alignment to be continued tomorrow + the scan offset

Note: observation on TM01 and TM10 modes, we clearly see that the beam position is different from the mode center position !!

 

Manar Amer wrote:

Yesterday, to find the source of why the mode is deformed, I tried to rotate the mirrors to see if there is a change.

I started with M2 and rotated it by ~ 90 degrees, there is a change in the shape of the beam.(image attached)

Will see if changing M2 to the spare M2 from SBox can fix the issue.

At the end of the day, alignment was lost.

will be redone today while changing M2 mirror.

Manar Amer wrote:

Today; replaced the M1 SBox mirror with M1 from gamma factory , following the previous alignment.

Removed all mirrors and cleaned them one by one.

Started with no M1, placed M2 did its alignment through M3 pinhole, then placed M3 aligned it through M4 pinhole, then placed M4 aligned it through M1 pinhole.

Placed M1 Gamma factory at the end

Note: mirror is new was not used before, took image on microscope there was no dust in the center, but there was little on the edges (cleaned it using spin-coater)

beating of fundamental mode observed (at M2 transmission) immediately with very higher order modes, slight adjustment on M4 suppressed them.

The beam is not circular and still has some deformation, M1 was changed, so it could be a damaged point at one of the other mirrors (to be investigated tomorrow)!!

No significant damage seen on the other mirrors.

 

 

Manar Amer wrote:

Last week In FP cavity we had all SBox mirrors including the damaged M1 mirror.

The beating was observed with just a slight adjustment on M4 alignment.

In addition, it was also observed while driving the piezo of the CW laser.

In the attached image of the beam at transmission point at M2 mirror, the shape of the beam is deformed.

one of the factors could be related to the damaged spot on M1 mirror. The deformation position can also be seen in the higher order modes.

after changing the injection mirror to Gamma factory M1, this deformation should disappear.

Manar Amer wrote:

Finished the alignment of the SBox with M1 of SBox placed, to be changed to gamma factory mirror later

Observed what seems to be transmission through M2 mirror, to be confirmed. image attached shows it

a PowerPoint attached showing the details of today's work.

 

 

Manar Amer wrote:
  • Adjust the placement of the Irises  (done at the start of the day, adjusted at the end when M1 mirror was placed)
  • Improvement on the Ma1 and Ma2 (The Alignment Mirrors)
    • Improves the alignment a bit. There is an observation where there is no symmetry in the image, concluded to be because of the pinholes that are usually used for the alignment the circle cut is not symmetric (took images on phone of pinholes)
    • This explains why, for the pinhole used on M1, we see a little more symmetry than the pinhole used on M2. 
    •  
    • Placed M1 mirror from Sbox (with damage spot in the middle), after cleaning it using the spincoater, only used to adjust the injection into the mirror where it will give Horizontal displacement due to the thickness of the mirror.
    • Last position of the motors attached
  • Installed the 2 dielectric mirrors for the reflection line
  • Did a rough alignment for the reflection line to have it exit through the reflection window.

Note about mirrors : They were cleaned a year a go and placed in the boxes. When opened the box and seen under microscope they were very dirty with dust particle 

Specially from the back, I believe the boxes have dust in them (to be verified under the UV light /  Microscope  !!!!!!!! )

 

Manar Amer wrote:

Remember to update the position of the reference Irises tomorrow !!!!

Manar Amer wrote:

After pointers and Advice from Aurélien,

improvement of the beam alignment through M1 and M2 irises was done.

To improve the image on the beam profiler, I cleaned the alignment mirrors and the windows using pure ethanol and optical lens cleaning tissue,

a significant improvement after cleaning the inside of M2 Window. Images have less dust diffraction rings.

Attached new images of the beam:

  • New Ma1 and Ma2 motor position
  • After M1 pinhole optimized (saturated)
  • After M2 and M1 pinhole optimizing (saturated and not)
Manar Amer wrote:

SBox alignment, using CW laser Koheras power 1 mW

  • Finished M1 and M2 alignment using the diffraction patterns seen on the beam profiler,  the beam fit is not very good ?? (image taken)
  • Positions of Ma1 and Ma2 motors are registered (image taken)
  • Placed Fixed 2 irises at M1 window and M2 window (Image taken while both are closed)
  • Distance between the collimator and beam profiler ~ 2 m
  • Distance between collimator and M1 diaphragm   ~ 1 m
  • Distance between collimator and M2 diaphragm ~ 1.6 m 

 

Manar Amer wrote:

Starting with the alignment of the KBox using CW Koheras.

The size of the CW output from the collimator at 1 meter from is ~ 2.4 mm, to be adjusted with lenses to match the cavity !!! (attached image)

For the 2 alignment mirrors, I am only able to control 3 axes for now (motor issue for the fourth to be fixed !!) , Horizontal and vertical for Ma1 and Horizontal for Ma2(closes to injection window).

Started with only irises placed on both the M1 and M2. Placed a beam profiler at the window behind M2 to observe an output beam.

Motors position for the 3 axes and beam shape and position after M2 attached.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Attachment 1: TM00_mode.jpg
TM00_mode.jpg
Attachment 2: TM01_mode.jpg
TM01_mode.jpg
Attachment 3: TM10_mode.jpg
TM10_mode.jpg
  90   Tue May 24 22:05:48 2022 Manar AmerFixedreportlasers and opticsOptical roomSBox Alignment

The external and internal alignment was redone.

External Alignment : the collimator position moved so in order to have a good start I placed 2 metallic mirrors and did a rough retrace of it's line through the cavity box.

It helped as I did not have to do a lot of adjustment on Ma1 and Ma2 position (new position attached)

 

Internal Alignment: I replaced the 2 pinholes inside the cavity box with another set where the holes are more symmetric, it shows in the alignment.

Images attached of the beam diffraction pattern after each mirror pinhole.

The injection mirror was placed at the end of the alignment.

Alignment Done !!!!!!!!!!!!!

 

Manar Amer wrote:

M2 Sbox changed to spare. Alignment of M2 was redone. 

With the help of Ronic , We observe fundamental mode of the cavity with higher order modes. A frequency scan on the piezo was done to find the beating frequency , the shape is elliptical with no clear deformation.

The beam seems to be hitting something, which causes a reflection seen on the beam profiler.

We started a slow scan to improvement of the outside alignment.

At the end of the day, I can only get the TM01 and TM10 modes,

alignment to be continued tomorrow + the scan offset

Note: observation on TM01 and TM10 modes, we clearly see that the beam position is different from the mode center position !!

 

Manar Amer wrote:

Yesterday, to find the source of why the mode is deformed, I tried to rotate the mirrors to see if there is a change.

I started with M2 and rotated it by ~ 90 degrees, there is a change in the shape of the beam.(image attached)

Will see if changing M2 to the spare M2 from SBox can fix the issue.

At the end of the day, alignment was lost.

will be redone today while changing M2 mirror.

Manar Amer wrote:

Today; replaced the M1 SBox mirror with M1 from gamma factory , following the previous alignment.

Removed all mirrors and cleaned them one by one.

Started with no M1, placed M2 did its alignment through M3 pinhole, then placed M3 aligned it through M4 pinhole, then placed M4 aligned it through M1 pinhole.

Placed M1 Gamma factory at the end

Note: mirror is new was not used before, took image on microscope there was no dust in the center, but there was little on the edges (cleaned it using spin-coater)

beating of fundamental mode observed (at M2 transmission) immediately with very higher order modes, slight adjustment on M4 suppressed them.

The beam is not circular and still has some deformation, M1 was changed, so it could be a damaged point at one of the other mirrors (to be investigated tomorrow)!!

No significant damage seen on the other mirrors.

 

 

Manar Amer wrote:

Last week In FP cavity we had all SBox mirrors including the damaged M1 mirror.

The beating was observed with just a slight adjustment on M4 alignment.

In addition, it was also observed while driving the piezo of the CW laser.

In the attached image of the beam at transmission point at M2 mirror, the shape of the beam is deformed.

one of the factors could be related to the damaged spot on M1 mirror. The deformation position can also be seen in the higher order modes.

after changing the injection mirror to Gamma factory M1, this deformation should disappear.

Manar Amer wrote:

Finished the alignment of the SBox with M1 of SBox placed, to be changed to gamma factory mirror later

Observed what seems to be transmission through M2 mirror, to be confirmed. image attached shows it

a PowerPoint attached showing the details of today's work.

 

 

Manar Amer wrote:
  • Adjust the placement of the Irises  (done at the start of the day, adjusted at the end when M1 mirror was placed)
  • Improvement on the Ma1 and Ma2 (The Alignment Mirrors)
    • Improves the alignment a bit. There is an observation where there is no symmetry in the image, concluded to be because of the pinholes that are usually used for the alignment the circle cut is not symmetric (took images on phone of pinholes)
    • This explains why, for the pinhole used on M1, we see a little more symmetry than the pinhole used on M2. 
    •  
    • Placed M1 mirror from Sbox (with damage spot in the middle), after cleaning it using the spincoater, only used to adjust the injection into the mirror where it will give Horizontal displacement due to the thickness of the mirror.
    • Last position of the motors attached
  • Installed the 2 dielectric mirrors for the reflection line
  • Did a rough alignment for the reflection line to have it exit through the reflection window.

Note about mirrors : They were cleaned a year a go and placed in the boxes. When opened the box and seen under microscope they were very dirty with dust particle 

Specially from the back, I believe the boxes have dust in them (to be verified under the UV light /  Microscope  !!!!!!!! )

 

Manar Amer wrote:

Remember to update the position of the reference Irises tomorrow !!!!

Manar Amer wrote:

After pointers and Advice from Aurélien,

improvement of the beam alignment through M1 and M2 irises was done.

To improve the image on the beam profiler, I cleaned the alignment mirrors and the windows using pure ethanol and optical lens cleaning tissue,

a significant improvement after cleaning the inside of M2 Window. Images have less dust diffraction rings.

Attached new images of the beam:

  • New Ma1 and Ma2 motor position
  • After M1 pinhole optimized (saturated)
  • After M2 and M1 pinhole optimizing (saturated and not)
Manar Amer wrote:

SBox alignment, using CW laser Koheras power 1 mW

  • Finished M1 and M2 alignment using the diffraction patterns seen on the beam profiler,  the beam fit is not very good ?? (image taken)
  • Positions of Ma1 and Ma2 motors are registered (image taken)
  • Placed Fixed 2 irises at M1 window and M2 window (Image taken while both are closed)
  • Distance between the collimator and beam profiler ~ 2 m
  • Distance between collimator and M1 diaphragm   ~ 1 m
  • Distance between collimator and M2 diaphragm ~ 1.6 m 

 

Manar Amer wrote:

Starting with the alignment of the KBox using CW Koheras.

The size of the CW output from the collimator at 1 meter from is ~ 2.4 mm, to be adjusted with lenses to match the cavity !!! (attached image)

For the 2 alignment mirrors, I am only able to control 3 axes for now (motor issue for the fourth to be fixed !!) , Horizontal and vertical for Ma1 and Horizontal for Ma2(closes to injection window).

Started with only irises placed on both the M1 and M2. Placed a beam profiler at the window behind M2 to observe an output beam.

Motors position for the 3 axes and beam shape and position after M2 attached.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Attachment 1: Ma1Ma2Horizontal.jpg
Ma1Ma2Horizontal.jpg
Attachment 2: Ma1Ma2Vertical.jpg
Ma1Ma2Vertical.jpg
Attachment 3: M1_pinhole.bmp
Attachment 4: M2_pinhole.bmp
Attachment 5: M1_M2_pinhole.bmp
Attachment 6: M3_pinhole.bmp
Attachment 7: M4_pinhole.bmp
  93   Wed Jun 8 10:47:45 2022 Manar AmerFixedreportlasers and opticsOptical roomSBox Alignment

Closing Series for Alignment.

Beating observed, beam is in the locking stages

 

Manar Amer wrote:

The external and internal alignment was redone.

External Alignment : the collimator position moved so in order to have a good start I placed 2 metallic mirrors and did a rough retrace of it's line through the cavity box.

It helped as I did not have to do a lot of adjustment on Ma1 and Ma2 position (new position attached)

 

Internal Alignment: I replaced the 2 pinholes inside the cavity box with another set where the holes are more symmetric, it shows in the alignment.

Images attached of the beam diffraction pattern after each mirror pinhole.

The injection mirror was placed at the end of the alignment.

Alignment Done !!!!!!!!!!!!!

 

Manar Amer wrote:

M2 Sbox changed to spare. Alignment of M2 was redone. 

With the help of Ronic , We observe fundamental mode of the cavity with higher order modes. A frequency scan on the piezo was done to find the beating frequency , the shape is elliptical with no clear deformation.

The beam seems to be hitting something, which causes a reflection seen on the beam profiler.

We started a slow scan to improvement of the outside alignment.

At the end of the day, I can only get the TM01 and TM10 modes,

alignment to be continued tomorrow + the scan offset

Note: observation on TM01 and TM10 modes, we clearly see that the beam position is different from the mode center position !!

 

Manar Amer wrote:

Yesterday, to find the source of why the mode is deformed, I tried to rotate the mirrors to see if there is a change.

I started with M2 and rotated it by ~ 90 degrees, there is a change in the shape of the beam.(image attached)

Will see if changing M2 to the spare M2 from SBox can fix the issue.

At the end of the day, alignment was lost.

will be redone today while changing M2 mirror.

Manar Amer wrote:

Today; replaced the M1 SBox mirror with M1 from gamma factory , following the previous alignment.

Removed all mirrors and cleaned them one by one.

Started with no M1, placed M2 did its alignment through M3 pinhole, then placed M3 aligned it through M4 pinhole, then placed M4 aligned it through M1 pinhole.

Placed M1 Gamma factory at the end

Note: mirror is new was not used before, took image on microscope there was no dust in the center, but there was little on the edges (cleaned it using spin-coater)

beating of fundamental mode observed (at M2 transmission) immediately with very higher order modes, slight adjustment on M4 suppressed them.

The beam is not circular and still has some deformation, M1 was changed, so it could be a damaged point at one of the other mirrors (to be investigated tomorrow)!!

No significant damage seen on the other mirrors.

 

 

Manar Amer wrote:

Last week In FP cavity we had all SBox mirrors including the damaged M1 mirror.

The beating was observed with just a slight adjustment on M4 alignment.

In addition, it was also observed while driving the piezo of the CW laser.

In the attached image of the beam at transmission point at M2 mirror, the shape of the beam is deformed.

one of the factors could be related to the damaged spot on M1 mirror. The deformation position can also be seen in the higher order modes.

after changing the injection mirror to Gamma factory M1, this deformation should disappear.

Manar Amer wrote:

Finished the alignment of the SBox with M1 of SBox placed, to be changed to gamma factory mirror later

Observed what seems to be transmission through M2 mirror, to be confirmed. image attached shows it

a PowerPoint attached showing the details of today's work.

 

 

Manar Amer wrote:
  • Adjust the placement of the Irises  (done at the start of the day, adjusted at the end when M1 mirror was placed)
  • Improvement on the Ma1 and Ma2 (The Alignment Mirrors)
    • Improves the alignment a bit. There is an observation where there is no symmetry in the image, concluded to be because of the pinholes that are usually used for the alignment the circle cut is not symmetric (took images on phone of pinholes)
    • This explains why, for the pinhole used on M1, we see a little more symmetry than the pinhole used on M2. 
    •  
    • Placed M1 mirror from Sbox (with damage spot in the middle), after cleaning it using the spincoater, only used to adjust the injection into the mirror where it will give Horizontal displacement due to the thickness of the mirror.
    • Last position of the motors attached
  • Installed the 2 dielectric mirrors for the reflection line
  • Did a rough alignment for the reflection line to have it exit through the reflection window.

Note about mirrors : They were cleaned a year a go and placed in the boxes. When opened the box and seen under microscope they were very dirty with dust particle 

Specially from the back, I believe the boxes have dust in them (to be verified under the UV light /  Microscope  !!!!!!!! )

 

Manar Amer wrote:

Remember to update the position of the reference Irises tomorrow !!!!

Manar Amer wrote:

After pointers and Advice from Aurélien,

improvement of the beam alignment through M1 and M2 irises was done.

To improve the image on the beam profiler, I cleaned the alignment mirrors and the windows using pure ethanol and optical lens cleaning tissue,

a significant improvement after cleaning the inside of M2 Window. Images have less dust diffraction rings.

Attached new images of the beam:

  • New Ma1 and Ma2 motor position
  • After M1 pinhole optimized (saturated)
  • After M2 and M1 pinhole optimizing (saturated and not)
Manar Amer wrote:

SBox alignment, using CW laser Koheras power 1 mW

  • Finished M1 and M2 alignment using the diffraction patterns seen on the beam profiler,  the beam fit is not very good ?? (image taken)
  • Positions of Ma1 and Ma2 motors are registered (image taken)
  • Placed Fixed 2 irises at M1 window and M2 window (Image taken while both are closed)
  • Distance between the collimator and beam profiler ~ 2 m
  • Distance between collimator and M1 diaphragm   ~ 1 m
  • Distance between collimator and M2 diaphragm ~ 1.6 m 

 

Manar Amer wrote:

Starting with the alignment of the KBox using CW Koheras.

The size of the CW output from the collimator at 1 meter from is ~ 2.4 mm, to be adjusted with lenses to match the cavity !!! (attached image)

For the 2 alignment mirrors, I am only able to control 3 axes for now (motor issue for the fourth to be fixed !!) , Horizontal and vertical for Ma1 and Horizontal for Ma2(closes to injection window).

Started with only irises placed on both the M1 and M2. Placed a beam profiler at the window behind M2 to observe an output beam.

Motors position for the 3 axes and beam shape and position after M2 attached.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  53   Wed Jan 29 19:04:38 2020 Loïc AmoudryFixedreportlasers and opticsOptical roomSBOX mirrors cleaned

Today, SBOX mirrors have been cleaned with spin coater on HR face and isoprop on back face. They show similar spots as before.

They also have been installed in the SBOX. The M1 mount has been displaced so the beam doesn't go in its center (spot).

  54   Wed Feb 5 14:47:16 2020 Loïc AmoudryFixedreportlasers and opticsOptical roomSBOX mirrors cleaned

Yesterday, after installation and alignment of mirrors and cavity, the Finesse has been measured with cavity at air pressure, with Koheras and modulation technique.
the measurement has been done 7 times with quite different fits for the Finesse : 21.5k, 21.5k, 23.7k, 21.3k, 22.3k, 22k, 21.5k

But, as the cavity is at air pressure, the lock is not very stable.
we will pump the cavity and make the measurement again.

 

Loïc Amoudry wrote:

Today, SBOX mirrors have been cleaned with spin coater on HR face and isoprop on back face. They show similar spots as before.

They also have been installed in the SBOX. The M1 mount has been displaced so the beam doesn't go in its center (spot).

 

  55   Wed Feb 5 16:46:01 2020 Loïc AmoudryFixedreportlasers and opticsOptical roomSBOX mirrors cleaned

Today we put the cavity to vacuum (~ 0.1 mBar) and we measured again the Finesse with Koheras and modulation technique.
the measurement has been done 3 times with Finesse of 23.2k, 23.8k, 23k

Loïc Amoudry wrote:

Yesterday, after installation and alignment of mirrors and cavity, the Finesse has been measured with cavity at air pressure, with Koheras and modulation technique.
the measurement has been done 5 times with quite different fits for the Finesse : 21.5k, 21.5k, 23.7k, 21.3k, 22.3k.

But, as the cavity is at air pressure, the lock is not very stable.
we will pump the cavity and make the measurement again.

 

Loïc Amoudry wrote:

Today, SBOX mirrors have been cleaned with spin coater on HR face and isoprop on back face. They show similar spots as before.

They also have been installed in the SBOX. The M1 mount has been displaced so the beam doesn't go in its center (spot).

 

 

  6   Tue Oct 9 10:19:29 2018 Loïc AmoudryFixedreportlasers and opticsOptical roomRecord power-up

Measurement made on 03/10/18 (nothing has been done since there).

Stable power in the cavity of 225 kW.

3rd stage current Transmission (mW) Pin (W)
0 8 0.37
2   5.3
2.2 145 6.4
3   10.7
4 350 16.1
5   21.8
6   27.3
7   32
8   36.7
8.5 640 39.1

 

  123   Mon Aug 8 17:58:32 2022 Ronic ChicheFixedinfolasers and opticsOptical roomPulse duration measurement before and after CVBG (as a strecher)

I recorded the pulse shape of the MENHIR 216MHz in its fiber injection setup.
the fiber is then connected to the Labbuddy photodiode (~ 15GHz BW) and then to the R&S RTO2000 4GHz scope (~ 100ps rise time).

1) I put a mirror just before the CVBG.
I'm able to get >8mW in the fiber.

as the pulses coming from the laser are not streched, they should be close to Menhir pulse width (~ 200fs).
then, what I measure here is only the pulse response of the measurement system.

2) I remove the mirror before the CVBG to stretch the pulse inside the CVBG
I'm able to get >6mW in the fiber.

the 1st plot is the comparison of the 2 measurements:
in blue, the pulse measurement w/o the CVBG
in red, the pulse measurement with the CVBG

the 2nd plot is the comparison of the pulse streched by the CVBG with the pulse w/o CVBG convoluted with a tp=77.4ps sech² pulse (sech²(t/tp)).
in red, the pulse measurement with the CVBG
in dashed black, the convolution.
(as the spectrum is changed by the CVBG, it is normal that both pulse shapes are not exactly the same).
tp=77.4ps corresponds to t_FWHM = 1.76*77.4ps = 136 ps

both pulses exhibit a FWHM duration of 194 ps.

with the present spectrum after CVBG (see 3rd plot), if the pulse was Fourier Transform limited (no stretched), the product of the FWHM (BW x duration) should be 0.315 (for sech² pulses).
FWHM BW wavelength ~ 1.1nm => FWHM BW ~ 311GHz => FWHM Tau ~ 0.315/311GHz ~ 1 ps
with 136 ps of FWHM duration, one can consider the CVBG has properly streched the pulse.

Attachment 1: pulse_measurement_without_and_with_CVBG.png
pulse_measurement_without_and_with_CVBG.png
Attachment 2: pulse_measurement_after_CVBG_compared_with_convolution.png
pulse_measurement_after_CVBG_compared_with_convolution.png
Attachment 3: SpectrumafterCVBGzoom.png.png
SpectrumafterCVBGzoom.png.png
  57   Thu Feb 6 16:58:57 2020 Loïc AmoudryFixedreportlasers and opticsOptical roomPower up to 48kW crater effect again

As we said, after glow discharge and spin coater we recovered a low power finesse ~23000 (aligning away from the M1 crater).

Today, we have made some power up to 48kW (3A on 3rd stage). At this power, there was no important effect on the transmission which can be compared with the coupling (see image "3A_136mWtrans"). We waited ~20min without aligning and the power dropped slowly (misalignment) to 39kW. 

Then we increased the amplifier power to 4A and the power went up to 44kW. At this moment, the strange transmission behavior that we observed before mirror crater, appeared again (see image "4A_126mWtrans"). We also observed a mode deformation with the camera, see image "mode_strange". This shape was not depend of the camera/filter rotation angle and still appear with another camera.

Loïc Amoudry wrote:

The mirrors went in the cavity the 28th of november (We did several power up to 30kW stored and only one to 40kW then the power went down to 2kW during the run).

Microscope study shows that mirrors get some dust during the handling [travel from microscope to SBOX --> installation --> in SBOX for +1month and power up --> travel to microscope].

Almost all of these dusts can be removed with cleaning.

There is only one important difference between 28th of november and today, a large spot on M1

 

Attachment 1: 3A_136mWtrans.png
3A_136mWtrans.png
Attachment 2: 4A_126mWtrans.png
4A_126mWtrans.png
Attachment 3: mode_strange.png
mode_strange.png
  154   Fri Sep 9 14:44:35 2022 Manar AmerFixedreportlasers and opticsOptical roomPower storage In Cavity

We start of power output from amplifier of 1W with only the first and second stage on then we start with the third stage power increase,

Note: when changing the current on the third stage 4 diodes, better to do it step by step for each one with a step of ~ 0.5 A

  •  

Amplifier output current (A)

for four diodes

Power Output (W)

Transmitted power (MW)

 

0 , 0 , 0 ,  0 ~ 1 2.3
1 , 1 , 1 , 1 / 11.0
1.5 , 1.3, 1 , 1 / 35
1.5 , 1.5 , 1 , 1 / 42.16
   

 

  • we placed at the transmission point a splitter the transmitted power before was 35 mW after placing it we had 26 mW
    • 97 % transmission , 3% reflected which goes to the beam profiler

 

  • We see degeneracy modes at the last step of 42.16 mW , so we started to test the D-shaped mirrors
    • the full range of the motors is 50.8 mm
    • each step =  30 nm , 30 000 steps = 1 mm
ELOG V3.1.4-395e101