HOME SBOX THOMX MINICAV Utilities
SBOX orders SBOX installation SBOX commissioning SBOX control command
  Status of commissioning, report also here plots are reports., Page 11 of 13  Not logged in ELOG logo
ID Date Authordown Status Type Category Location Title
  15   Wed Oct 31 13:43:28 2018 Loïc AmoudryFixedreportlasers and opticsOptical roomFinesse vs power by difference between main and second resonance

Measurement on 24/10/18

Loïc Amoudry wrote:

Measurements show that ratio decrease versus power. BUT, the second resonance measurement induce lower power in the cavity so the ratio is not directly true.

Also, simulation of the main/second resonance power by Pierre's simulation has shown ratio ~50, ~47.6 and 43.5 respectively for 0A, 2A and 4A.

I (A) Main resonance (mW) Second resonance (mW) Ratio
0 8.07 0.416 19.4
2 121 6.77 17.9
4 324 20.2 16

 

 

  16   Wed Oct 31 13:44:22 2018 Loïc AmoudryFixedreportlasers and opticsOptical roomFinesse vs power by difference between main and second resonance

Measurement on 25/10/2018

Loïc Amoudry wrote:

Measurements show that ratio decrease versus power. BUT, the second resonance measurement induce lower power in the cavity so the ratio is not directly true.

Also, simulation of the main/second resonance power by Pierre's simulation has shown ratio ~50, ~47.6 and 43.5 respectively for 0A, 2A and 4A.

I (A) Main resonance (mW) Second resonance (mW) Ratio
0 8.07 0.416 19.4
2 121 6.77 17.9
4 324 20.2 16

 

 

  17   Wed Oct 31 13:48:58 2018 Loïc AmoudryFixedreportlasers and opticsOptical roomM1 transmission measurement

Center of M1:

I (A) Input power (mW) Transmitted power (mW) Transmission (ppm)
0 78 0.01477 189
4 16500 3.2 194
  18   Wed Oct 31 13:51:17 2018 Loïc AmoudryFixedinfolasers and opticsOptical roomChange of the 3 ULE mirrors by 3 spare ULE mirrors

First finesse measurement 20 266, FSR 133.351 MHz under vacuum

Attachment 1: Miroirs_à_1031_nm-ThomX_-_décembre2017.pdf
Attachment 2: vacuum.isf
  19   Wed Oct 31 14:03:22 2018 Loïc AmoudryFixedreportlasers and opticsOptical roomM4 transmission measurement

The kept transmission for M4 is 2.17 ppm. Which is the value measured after alignement (center of the mirror).

These measurements have been taken before alignement.

I (A) Input power (mW) Transmitted power after window (mW) Transmission (ppm)
0 74.3 195.2e-6 2.63
0 73.5 212.8e-6 2.89
0 52.4 151e-6 2.88
6 28 400 72e-3 2.54

High dependence against the position. Few measurement several mm away from the center each one at different position give 194, 193, 208, 200 ppm.

  20   Wed Oct 31 14:04:50 2018 Loïc AmoudryFixedreportlasers and opticsOptical roomM4 transmission measurement
Loïc Amoudry wrote:

The kept transmission for M4 is 2.17 ppm. Which is the value measured after alignement (center of the mirror).

These measurements have been taken before alignement.

I (A) Input power (mW) Transmitted power after window (mW) Transmission (ppm)
0 74.3 195.2e-6 2.63
0 73.5 212.8e-6 2.89
0 52.4 151e-6 2.88
6 28 400 72e-3 2.54

High dependence against the position. Few measurement several mm away from the center each one at different position give 2.86, 2.68, 2.93, 3.01, 3.06, 3.35 ppm.

 

  21   Wed Oct 31 14:06:17 2018 Loïc AmoudryFixedreportlasers and opticsOptical roomM1 transmission measurement

At different positions, transmission give 194, 193, 208, 200 ppm?

Loïc Amoudry wrote:

Center of M1:

I (A) Input power (mW) Transmitted power (mW) Transmission (ppm)
0 78 0.01477 189
4 16500 3.2 194

 

  22   Mon Nov 5 13:11:08 2018 Loïc AmoudryFixedreportlasers and opticsOptical roomFirst run with spare mirrors
I (A) Trans (mW) Coupling (%) Pin (W) Gain
0 4 70 0.37 4982
2 58 80 5.2 5140
4 180 75 16.1 5152
6 270 63 27.3 4558
8 340 60 36.7 4269

 

Attachment 1: Plot_power_and_gain_vs_all.JPG
Plot_power_and_gain_vs_all.JPG
Attachment 2: powerup.xlsx
  23   Thu Nov 15 13:02:44 2018 Loïc AmoudryFixedinfolasers and opticsOptical roomMirrors cleaning

The new mirrors didn't give expected results. Then the 4 old mirrors have been sent to LMA on 12/11/18 for a cleaning and caracterization before and after cleaning. Also asked for a diffusion/absorption map on the mirrors if possible. They didn't really answered on what will they do. 
Received on 13/11/18 by LMA.

  24   Fri Dec 21 13:42:43 2018 Loïc AmoudryFixedinfolasers and opticsOptical roomMirrors features, come back from LMA

Mirrors arrived today from LMA. Their features are damaged.

Photos avant ou après nettoyage, pas clair dans le mail de Laurent : 

"J'ai commencé à nettoyer M1 et M2 avec notr methode habituelle et je me suis aperçu que sur la partie centrale (en gros taille de ton faisceau j'ai l'impression) que des choses apparaissaient (voir photo)
Si bien que la diffusion n'a pas évolué dans le bon sens (diminution) voir empiré pour M1. J'ai donc arrêter de les nettoyer !!!
J'ai regardé les faces arrières des miroirs avant nettoyage et j'ai pu voir ce que tu vois sur la photo même au centre. Je sais pas de quoi cela peut venir.
Une chose est sûre le coating IBS a été altéré par je ne sais quoi dans ta manip provoquant cette dégradation dès qu'on y touche. L'interaction avec les faisceaux d'eélectrons n'avait jamais altéré les miroirs sur l'expértience DESY par exemple!!
Pour me rassurer, j'ai pris un miroir fait sur un micropoli qu'on a en stock et aucun pb lors du nettoyage (on peut penser à tout)"
 

 

Attachment 1: 181201_caracteristiques_miroirs.PNG
181201_caracteristiques_miroirs.PNG
Attachment 2: 20181207_155704_resized.jpg
20181207_155704_resized.jpg
Attachment 3: 20181207_155726_resized.jpg
20181207_155726_resized.jpg
  25   Thu Jan 24 17:44:21 2019 Loïc AmoudryFixedreportlasers and opticsOptical roomDeposit on S-box mirrors after return from LMA

Cleaning on dirty surface shows something is deposited on the surface. Cleaning displaces and removes part of the deposit.

Attachment 1: 28_M2ReflectiveBeforeCleaning_compressed.jpg
28_M2ReflectiveBeforeCleaning_compressed.jpg
Attachment 2: 29_M2ReflectiveAfter1stCleanPaper_compressed.jpg
29_M2ReflectiveAfter1stCleanPaper_compressed.jpg
  26   Thu Jan 24 17:49:54 2019 Loïc AmoudryFixedreportlasers and opticsOptical roomImpacts on mirror's surface

All the mirrors show impacts on there surface (some of them do not show deposit). Does it come from experiments or fabrication ? Are these holes or bumps ?

Attachment 1: 18_M1reflectiveface2x_compressed.jpg
18_M1reflectiveface2x_compressed.jpg
  27   Fri Feb 1 13:45:19 2019 Loïc AmoudryFixedreportlasers and opticsOtherAFM performed on S-BOX mirrors

29/02/19 - AFM has shown that spots on mirror's surfaces are bumps and not holes.

Attachment 1: Image3.jpg
Image3.jpg
Attachment 2: Image4.jpg
Image4.jpg
  28   Fri Feb 1 14:04:27 2019 Loïc AmoudryFixedinfolasers and opticsOtherMeeting with LMA people, AFM

30/01/19 - The following powerpoint shows the results discussed with LMA people.

What came out from the discussion is:

- Their cleaning method uses demineralized water drop on a spinner. It is probably the explanation of the circular traces on the mirror's surfaces but we still don't know what is this deposit (XPS is running out on 2 of this mirrors at this time).

-  According to their point of view, the spots could come from the coating deposition technique and are "normal". No real explaination, should not come from the substrat which is ultra-polished but can come from some clustering in the coating.

We gave them 2 of the mirrors so they can check if it is possible to clean them. They'll also do a measurement of the mirror's topology.

Attachment 1: POINT_SUR_LES_MIROIRS.pptx
  29   Wed Nov 13 13:15:53 2019 Loïc AmoudryFixedreportlasers and opticsOtherAFM+ InfraRed spectroscopy (IR spectro) has been performed

AFM+ InfraRed spectroscopy (IR spectro) has been performed on 400kW S-BOX mirrors.

Seems that XPS made M3 and M4 dirty, but M1 have also ome dust. M2 seems clean, further AFM experiment should show that it is as clean as M1.

Attachment 1: 191113_AFMetspecIR-miroirs_SBOX.pdf
  30   Fri Dec 6 11:53:53 2019 Loïc AmoudryFixedreportlasers and opticsOptical roomMirror's cleaning

XPS has been proceeded on the 400kW SBOX mirrors M3 and M4 (the initial cavity spherical mirrors) in frebruary 2019. Deposited a lot of particles on these mirrors.
All the mirrors received a Infrared spectroscopy the 12th of november 2019. Deposited glue on the non-reflective face (was used to hold them).
15th of november (2019): The four 400kW SBOX mirror's have been cleaned with aceton and isopropanol.
28th of november (2019): The four 400kW SBOX mirror's have been cleaned with spin coater.

Summary:

Aceton and isopropanol removed most of the particles and all the glue. But it let some traces on the mirror surface on all the mirrors (so there is some kind of grease on the surfaces).
Spin coater removes all the traces.

See pictures. On all the first images, we also see the dust which is on the non reflective face through the mirror. On M3 and M4 there is still the "glue" on the non reflective face on their frst images + refletive faces very dirty because of XPS.

Attachment 1: resume_M3.PNG
resume_M3.PNG
Attachment 2: resume_M1_M2_M4.PNG
resume_M1_M2_M4.PNG
  31   Fri Dec 6 11:54:58 2019 Loïc AmoudryFixedreportlasers and opticsOptical roomMirror's installed

The initial 400kW SBOX mirrors which have been cleaned ont 28th of november have been installed this morning on the SBOX.

  46   Thu Jan 9 16:54:05 2020 Loïc AmoudryFixedreportlasers and opticsOptical roomMicroscope and cleaning of SBOX mirrors

The mirrors went in the cavity the 28th of november (We did several power up to 30kW stored and only one to 40kW then the power went down to 2kW during the run).

Microscope study shows that mirrors get some dust during the handling [travel from microscope to SBOX --> installation --> in SBOX for +1month and power up --> travel to microscope].

Almost all of these dusts can be removed with cleaning.

There is only one important difference between 28th of november and today, a large spot on M1

Attachment 1: resume_nettoyage_apres_sejour_dans_K-BOX_et_montee_en_puissance.PNG
resume_nettoyage_apres_sejour_dans_K-BOX_et_montee_en_puissance.PNG
  49   Fri Jan 24 17:52:14 2020 Loïc AmoudryFixedreportlasers and opticsOptical roomAFM analysis of M1

AFM has been proceeded on M1 and M2.

The pdf shows the first images taken with the PLIC room Leica microscope (zoom x10 and x80).

Then the hole has been studied with a handmade microscope. It brought a better resolution. We can now see the hole has an edge, a center structure and and extra-hole sparkle (pailleté) structure.

The AFM shows these 3 structures are real. The top of the hole is at ~+1µm and the center ~-2µm compare to the coating surface. The sparkles are ~10nm high and we also found kind of "explosion" desposit while zooming on the sparkles.

The 3D view and profil show perfectly the "crater".

Attachment 1: 200115_AFM_miroirs.pdf
  50   Fri Jan 24 17:56:11 2020 Loïc AmoudryFixedinfolasers and opticsOptical roomAFM analysis of M2

We had enough time to proceed a quick scan of M2 which has also a hole but not centered on the mirror.

The hole is larger and higher than the one on M1. But the vertical range was to high for the AFM. Then we cannot see if there are sparkles or not on this image. Further study with microscope would be welcome.

Attachment 1: M2.PNG
M2.PNG
ELOG V3.1.4-395e101