The CFBG has been removed successfully and the amplifier is closed now.

The soldering machine had a calibration trouble and was sent to the company for review during holidays.

The output power has been checked and is the same as before (tested until 30W ouput power).

The glow discharge cleaner has been tested on the SBOX mirrors.

I've put them 1 by 1. Each run was 15min long at 15mA. The mirrors HR face was always away from the electrode and ~35° angle with the support. These values have been choosen thanks to the reference:

• https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.26.003884

We have learned that Air can be compared to Azote and Azote to Oxygen in glow discharge. The main difference is H2O in air which make the glow discharge less stable as say several papers.

Today, SBOX mirrors have been cleaned with spin coater on HR face and isoprop on back face. They show similar spots as before.

They also have been installed in the SBOX. The M1 mount has been displaced so the beam doesn't go in its center (spot).

Yesterday, after installation and alignment of mirrors and cavity, the Finesse has been measured with cavity at air pressure, with Koheras and modulation technique.
the measurement has been done 7 times with quite different fits for the Finesse : 21.5k, 21.5k, 23.7k, 21.3k, 22.3k, 22k, 21.5k

But, as the cavity is at air pressure, the lock is not very stable.
we will pump the cavity and make the measurement again.

Today we put the cavity to vacuum (~ 0.1 mBar) and we measured again the Finesse with Koheras and modulation technique.
the measurement has been done 3 times with Finesse of 23.2k, 23.8k, 23k

As we said, after glow discharge and spin coater we recovered a low power finesse ~23000 (aligning away from the M1 crater).

Today, we have made some power up to 48kW (3A on 3rd stage). At this power, there was no important effect on the transmission which can be compared with the coupling (see image "3A_136mWtrans"). We waited ~20min without aligning and the power dropped slowly (misalignment) to 39kW. 

Then we increased the amplifier power to 4A and the power went up to 44kW. At this moment, the strange transmission behavior that we observed before mirror crater, appeared again (see image "4A_126mWtrans"). We also observed a mode deformation with the camera, see image "mode_strange". This shape was not depend of the camera/filter rotation angle and still appear with another camera.

On 10th of december 2020 we cleaned the SBOX mirrors and took microscope images (the name of the images indicates what they are).

There are 7 mirror, the initial M1 (spot in the center), M2 (spot on the edge), M3 and M4 which made the 200-400kW and the M2, M3 and M4 SPARE. The difference we make between M3 and M4 SPARE is the number on the box (11 or 13).

We used 3 different cleaning methods : 1st, one spin coater on HR, 2nd one, tissu wipe on AR (wipe with the optical tissu and isoprop) or 3rd one, mirror wiped on tissue (put isoprop on tissu and press AR face of the mirror doing "8" shape 3 times).

The second method is far les efficient as a cleaning method. The image "M3_M4_spare_11_after_cleaning_back.tif " shows the traces let by it and removed by the 3rd method on image "M3_M4_spare_11_after_cleaning_back_second_time_on_tissu.tif".

We can also notice that the spin coater let some trace on the HR face, round shaped, see Image "M3_M4_spare_13_after_cleaning_back.tif". We can propose to use the third method with Acetone on HR face before using spin coater to remove oil or organic particles.

It also lets a trace on the AR face, this is why we clean the AR face with the 2nd method after cleaning it with the spin coater.

Note : The position of the mirrors in the microscope is always the same here. Meaning mirrors are directed so that the arrow (which shows the HR face and is placed on the side of the mirror) is placed on the top of the images.

Onefive output power is 24mW now, and 2.41mW(after EOM) injected into fiber,

a injection power monitor added, 99% (2.06mW)  injected into amplifier, 1% (16.1uW) monitored with photodiode DET36A/M, which gives ~500mV DC signal on oscilloscope with 1Mohm impedanc;

First stage amplifier works good, monitoring phtodiode gives more than 200mV DC signal with 50ohm impedance on oscilloscope (as attached photo);

Second stage, the old monitoring photodiode is broken, a new monitoring photodiode is connected, which we don't have reference data for it,

on the optical output port of the monitoring signal, it's written 150mW, but at where we measured 40mW.

I just had a phone call with Jérome and he told me 2 things :

* Be carefull ! the MightyLaser amplifier is not designed to work with 33MHz laser : the streching level is not sufficient !
One could worsen the phase noise by self-modulation due to peak power or even distroy the amplifier !
One should use it only at low power !!!

* He thinks we should more or less find back the same DC levels than before even with lower seeding power and lower repetition rate.
He thinks we should look at the optical spectrum to check if we don't have some ASE in the 1st stage and 2nd stage signal !
We can send him plots or call him to discuss these points.

The chiller of CELIA amplifier has been moved from the corridor to the changing room in front of PLIC. 

It was not functionning well (quick drop of flow below 0.9l/min). After several cleanings of the filter, shorting the water circuit a stable 2.1l/min flow was obtained. Then the water circuit was elongated to go close to the amplifier but not into it. Allowing to get about 1.3l/min stable. Now the amplifier is conencted, the filter has been cleaned again twice and the flow seem stable with 1.4l/min. New filters have been ordered and must arrive quickly. Changing it is necessary I think. 

today, temperature of the chiller has been set to 23°C.

measured temperature in the chiller reaches 23°C after approximatively 10 minutes

The Menhir 160MHz has been put back in place on the CELIA amplifier setup. Its output power is measured to be 150-160mW with an attenuator as expected. Its spectrum is available in "spectre_avant_cvbg.xlsx" and "spectre_avant_cvbg.png".

The pulses are stretched by means of a CVBG. Their spectrum is available in "spectre_apres_cvbg.xlsx" and "spectre_apres_cvbg.png".

The laser is coupled into an optical fiber with an output power of 11.5mW for a 32mW input.

The Menhir 216MHz laser has been put back in place on the cavity table. Its output power is measured to be 160mW with an attenuator. Its spectrum is available in "spectre.xlsx" and "spectre.png". The main wavelength is a bit shorter (1028.75nm) and the spectrum a bit narrower (4.73nm) than expected.

At the beginning of the week, I installed a half-wave plate, a beamsplitter cube and a quarter-wave plate, as well as the end-of-cavity mirror, which I unsuccessfully tried to align.

I removed the end-of-cavity mirror and started the laser injection over again with the two motorized mirrors placed in front of the vacuum chamber (but left Ronic's setup as it was).

Today, I aligned the laser by putting an iris on the cavity mirrors' mounts. I tested the repeatability of such a setup, both by removing and putting back the same iris and by using a different iris. The result is in the attached pictures. Is it good enough ?

The mirrors' motors positions are :

- 1 : 3.349670 mm ;

- 3 : 2.060280 mm ;

- 4 : 3.484560 mm ;

- 5 : 3.269710 mm.

Yesterday and today, I replaced the OEWaves CW laser with the NKT CW laser. Its screen does not display anything, so it has to be operated through the GraphiK software.

I then re-aligned the cavity with a new adjustment adaptation tool between the mirror mounts and the irises.

The motor positions are :

- 1 : 3.354420 mm

- 3 : 2.128850 mm

- 4 : 3.468480 mm

- 5 : 3.157300 mm

I then connected the LaseLock module to scan the NKT laser wavelength on a roughly 0-10 V range at a 2Hz rate, so that it could match the cavity's resonance frequency.

Without optimizing the injection, I monitored the transmitted power with a photodiode paired with an amplifier. The pictures are available through this link : https://box.in2p3.fr/s/TGgwkKgYik7MyqW, and an example picture is attached. Their timestamp is in their filenames, and it seems that the transmission varies quite a lot on a ≈10 s scale, and these variations seem to be periodic on a ≈1 minute scale. The peaks seem weirdly wide, almost up to 100-200 MHz (≈FSR).

The NKT laser PZT sensitivity is ~0.09pm/V of wavelength variation, which is equivalent to ~ 25MHz/V
So, the full range of the scan is roughly 250MHz (more than a FSR) for 10V.

It seems impossible to get such large resonances unless the Finesse is very low => let's try to change M1 by a spare GammaFactory plan or 10m ROC mirror.

Today with Ronic, we changed the FP cavity's mirrors to Layertek (Gamma Factory) mirrors :

- M1 : n°161186 --> fused silica, unknown absorption, unknown diffusion, T1=2500ppm transmission planar mirror ;
- M2 : n°161182 --> fused silica, unknown absorption, unknown diffusion, T2=10ppm transmission, 5m ROC mirror.

RTL (round-trip losses) ~ 2500 + 10 ppm (we forget the unknown parameters for absorption and diffusion).
The maximal finesse we could expect is thus F=π([(1-T1)(1-T2)]^(1/4))/(1-[(1-T1)(1-2)]^(1/2)) ~  2*pi /RTL ≈ 2500 assuming no absorption and no scattering.

The FP cavity's FSR is ≈ 216 MHz given its length.

We managed to see some optical beating on the FP cavity's mirrors and to reach the fundamental transverse mode of the FP cavity by adjusting the injection mirrors, but when scanning the laser's wavelength, some higher-order modes appear and the fundamental mode is reached when the voltage applied to the piezoelectric actuator of the laser's cavity is ≈0V. The actuator is not meant to work with negative voltages, so we translated one of the FP cavity's mirrors so that the fundamental transverse mode's resonance frequency is in the middle of the voltage range.

We also removed the D-shaped mirrors, as they are only useful when working with high power.

Today with Dorian we tested three mirrors with which we previously haven't been able to obtain any resonance or optical beating :

- C16111/11 : The mirror looks normal under a microscope, apart from a few inclusions and maybe a small scratch towards the edge. We tested it with a 161186 M1 mirror and we weren't able to obtain any optical beating on the cavity's mirrors or resonance.

- 161185 (1) : The mirror looks normal with the naked eye. We tested it with a 161182 M2 mirror and we were able to notice some optical beating on the cavity's mirrors as well as small resonance peaks and a higher-order transverse mode.

- 161185 (2) : The mirror shows some damage on the substrate side (not the coated side). We tested it with a 161186 M2 mirror and we were able to notice some optical beating on the cavity's mirrors as well as huge resonance peaks and a Gaussian transverse mode.

The updated recap file is available here, as well as a few pictures.

In June, we encountered some problems regarding the transmission and error signals (see images here), looking as if the laser was switched off before the cavity was filled.

Aurélien, Ronic and I discussed this on 08/27, resulting in a list of tests to perform. We :

- checked the mirrors' thickness (maybe there was some mechanical stress if they were too thick). The mirrors' thickness is 6.35mm (1/4 inch) and is consistent with the mounts size ;

- checked the mirrors' mounts' screws' tightening (maybe the mirrors were either moving if the screws were not tight enough or some mechanical stress if they were too tight). We tightened the mirrors' mounts' upper screws.

Next thing we did with Ronic was check if the error signal depended on the modulation/demodulation relative phase, which was not the case, but it should have.

Ronic added a quarter waveplate before the half waveplate in the injection system.

Today, on 08/29, the succession of the higher-order transverse modes when scanning the seeder laser's piezoelectric actuator's voltage to scan the seeder laser's optical frequency seemed a bit strange, so we checked the resonance frequencies of several occurrences of the same transverse mode :

- (0, 0) : @ -0.4V and 6.0V ;

- (1, 0) and (0, 1) : @0.5V and 6.9V.

In both cases, several occurrences were separated by about 6.4V, which corresponds to the voltage difference to scan a full FSR. The spacing between (0, 0) and (1, 0)/(0, 1) is then about 0.14*FSR.

I checked this by writing a small piece of Python code to calculate the cavity's fundamental transverse mode and its Rayleigh length, which is displayed in Figure 1, and then by calculating the resonance frequencies wrt the (0, 0) resonance frequency for the (1, 0), (0, 1) and (1, 1) transverse modes, which is displayed in Figure 2, with the following formula: $\nu_{p, n, m}=(p+\frac{(n+\frac{1}{2})\arctan(\frac{2L_{\text{cav}}}{z_{\text{R}}})+(m+\frac{1}{2})\arctan(\frac{2L_{\text{cav}}}{z_{\text{R}}})}{2\pi})\times\text{FSR}$ for a $p$ longitudinal and ($n$, $m$) transverse mode. Here, $p=1$. The spacing betwen (0, 0) and (1, 0)/(0, 1) is about 0.11*FSR, making the previous observation consistent with the calculation. Everything seems normal.

Ronic also increased the EOM modulation voltage, increasing the modulation depth for the generation of the error signal (from 100mV RMS to 300mV RMS), making the error signal depend on the modulation/demodulation relative phase, as it should. He managed to lock the laser onto the cavity for about 1s at a time.

Next steps are to optimize the PID parameters and to add a low-pass filter/AOM to cut the higher frequencies off and improve the feedback loop.

Today, with Ronic, we managed to get a successful lock with the NKT laser by setting up a new PDH box from scratch (photodiode + amplifer + mixer).

Me measured the injected power (5.4mW) and the transmitted power (33µW) after a wedge (92% transmission) and a 7ppm transmission mirror, so the intracavity power was 5.1W. We have a 950 enhancement factor for a 3100 finesse cavity, so a nominal enhancement factor of 2500. The lock was very stable, as shown in the attached picture (yellow signal is the transmitted power, orange signal is the error signal and green signal is the voltage sent from the Laselock module to the pizeoelectric actuator of the NKT laser cavity).

Then, we added a second EOM in order to perform a finesse measurement, but we weren't able to inject more than 3mW at full laser power in the cavity or to lock the laser onto the cavity.