HOME SBOX THOMX MINICAV Utilities
THOMX orders THOMX installation THOMX commissioning THOMX control command
  Status of commissioning, report also here plots are reports., Page 19 of 24  Not logged in ELOG logo
ID Date Authordown Status Type Category Location Title
  138   Fri Apr 1 23:59:51 2022 Manar AmerFixedreportlasers and opticsThomX iglooAlphanov amplifier Beam Profile

Today a second reading of the beam profile was done , with Victor ,Ronic, Aurlien and Manar

an additional set-up was made using two 4 deg wedges instead of High reflecting (HR) and Anti-reflecting (AR) mirrors.

Two reading were taken:

  • at the output of the compressor with a NE30A filter on the beam profiler
  • at the output of the amplifier with NE30A + NE10A filter on beam profiler

 

 

Manar Amer wrote:

Adding the fitted beam in 1D in Horizontal and vertical axis.

for 10%   to  60%

Manar Amer wrote:

 

Manar Amer wrote:

Today: Manar, Ronic and Aurlien started the study of the beam profile of the alphanov amplifier at high power.

The setup shown in the image shows how the power is reduced by using Anti-reflective mirrors,

pick up 1 : Anti-reflective coating on both sides , pick up 2 : Anti-reflective coating on one side and High reflectivity on the other

 

using this method, we avoid saturation and damage to the beam profiler from the high power amplified laser

in addition, an OD3 filter is placed in front of the beam profiler. and a reflective mirror is placed close to deflect the reflection from the mirror(pick up 1) second surface.

The beam observed is relatively well shaped and fitted up to 50% of amplification is where the shape starts to deform a little and is not well-fitted by a Gaussian. (image attached shows the fit for 60% amplification)

The cause is yet to be determined, as it could only be related to the reflections that occur from the mirrors (pick up 1 and pick up 2)

 

*** Note be always careful at High Power :)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  139   Sat Apr 2 00:45:25 2022 Manar AmerFixedreportlasers and opticsThomX iglooAlphanov amplifier Beam Profile

Readings of the beam shape and horizontal (upper plot) and vertical (lower plot) axis fit at the direct output of the amplifier.

The beam shape relatively shaped like an egg.

Manar Amer wrote:

Today a second reading of the beam profile was done , with Victor ,Ronic, Aurlien and Manar

an additional set-up was made using two 4 deg wedges instead of High reflecting (HR) and Anti-reflecting (AR) mirrors.

Two reading were taken:

  • at the output of the compressor with a NE30A filter on the beam profiler
  • at the output of the amplifier with NE30A + NE10A filter on beam profiler

 

 

Manar Amer wrote:

Adding the fitted beam in 1D in Horizontal and vertical axis.

for 10%   to  60%

Manar Amer wrote:

 

Manar Amer wrote:

Today: Manar, Ronic and Aurlien started the study of the beam profile of the alphanov amplifier at high power.

The setup shown in the image shows how the power is reduced by using Anti-reflective mirrors,

pick up 1 : Anti-reflective coating on both sides , pick up 2 : Anti-reflective coating on one side and High reflectivity on the other

 

using this method, we avoid saturation and damage to the beam profiler from the high power amplified laser

in addition, an OD3 filter is placed in front of the beam profiler. and a reflective mirror is placed close to deflect the reflection from the mirror(pick up 1) second surface.

The beam observed is relatively well shaped and fitted up to 50% of amplification is where the shape starts to deform a little and is not well-fitted by a Gaussian. (image attached shows the fit for 60% amplification)

The cause is yet to be determined, as it could only be related to the reflections that occur from the mirrors (pick up 1 and pick up 2)

 

*** Note be always careful at High Power :)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Attachment 1: 20220401_Alphanov_Beam_setup_before_compressor.jpg
20220401_Alphanov_Beam_setup_before_compressor.jpg
Attachment 2: 20220401_Amplifier_beforeCompressor_40perc_133MHz.bmp
Attachment 3: 20220401_Amplifier_beforeCompressor_50perc_133MHz.bmp
Attachment 4: 20220401_Amplifier_beforeCompressor_60perc_133MHz.bmp
Attachment 5: 20220401_Amplifier_beforeCompressor_70perc_133MHz.bmp
Attachment 6: 20220401_Amplifier_beforeCompressor_40perc_133MHz_BeamFit.png
20220401_Amplifier_beforeCompressor_40perc_133MHz_BeamFit.png
Attachment 7: 20220401_Amplifier_beforeCompressor_50perc_133MHz_BeamFit.png
20220401_Amplifier_beforeCompressor_50perc_133MHz_BeamFit.png
Attachment 8: 20220401_Amplifier_beforeCompressor_60perc_133MHz_BeamFit.png
20220401_Amplifier_beforeCompressor_60perc_133MHz_BeamFit.png
Attachment 9: 20220401_Amplifier_beforeCompressor_70perc_133MHz_BeamFit.png
20220401_Amplifier_beforeCompressor_70perc_133MHz_BeamFit.png
  140   Sat Apr 2 00:51:07 2022 Manar AmerFixedreportlasers and opticsThomX iglooAlphanov amplifier Beam Profile

Readings of the beam shape and fit at the output of the compressor

differance from previous reading is that here we used wedges instead of HR mirrors.

Similar to previous readings, the beam shape deforms and the Gaussian fit is bad after 50% amplification

Manar Amer wrote:

Readings of the beam shape and horizontal (upper plot) and vertical (lower plot) axis fit at the direct output of the amplifier.

The beam shape relatively shaped like an egg.

Manar Amer wrote:

Today a second reading of the beam profile was done , with Victor ,Ronic, Aurlien and Manar

an additional set-up was made using two 4 deg wedges instead of High reflecting (HR) and Anti-reflecting (AR) mirrors.

Two reading were taken:

  • at the output of the compressor with a NE30A filter on the beam profiler
  • at the output of the amplifier with NE30A + NE10A filter on beam profiler

 

 

Manar Amer wrote:

Adding the fitted beam in 1D in Horizontal and vertical axis.

for 10%   to  60%

Manar Amer wrote:

 

Manar Amer wrote:

Today: Manar, Ronic and Aurlien started the study of the beam profile of the alphanov amplifier at high power.

The setup shown in the image shows how the power is reduced by using Anti-reflective mirrors,

pick up 1 : Anti-reflective coating on both sides , pick up 2 : Anti-reflective coating on one side and High reflectivity on the other

 

using this method, we avoid saturation and damage to the beam profiler from the high power amplified laser

in addition, an OD3 filter is placed in front of the beam profiler. and a reflective mirror is placed close to deflect the reflection from the mirror(pick up 1) second surface.

The beam observed is relatively well shaped and fitted up to 50% of amplification is where the shape starts to deform a little and is not well-fitted by a Gaussian. (image attached shows the fit for 60% amplification)

The cause is yet to be determined, as it could only be related to the reflections that occur from the mirrors (pick up 1 and pick up 2)

 

*** Note be always careful at High Power :)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Attachment 1: 20220401_Alphanov_Beam_setup_after_compressor.jpg
20220401_Alphanov_Beam_setup_after_compressor.jpg
Attachment 2: 20220401_Amplifier_AfterCompressor_50perc_133MHz.bmp
Attachment 3: 20220401_Amplifier_AfterCompressor_60perc_133MHz.bmp
Attachment 4: 20220401_Amplifier_AfterCompressor_50perc_133MHz_BeamFit.png
20220401_Amplifier_AfterCompressor_50perc_133MHz_BeamFit.png
Attachment 5: 20220401_Amplifier_AfterCompressor_60perc_133MHz_BeamFit.png
20220401_Amplifier_AfterCompressor_60perc_133MHz_BeamFit.png
  141   Mon Apr 4 14:23:14 2022 Manar AmerFixedreportlasers and opticsThomX iglooAlphanov amplifier Beam Profile

Adding the readings  20% , 30% ,  40%  for output of amplifier after the compressor

 

Manar Amer wrote:

Readings of the beam shape and fit at the output of the compressor

differance from previous reading is that here we used wedges instead of HR mirrors.

Similar to previous readings, the beam shape deforms and the Gaussian fit is bad after 50% amplification

Manar Amer wrote:

Readings of the beam shape and horizontal (upper plot) and vertical (lower plot) axis fit at the direct output of the amplifier.

The beam shape relatively shaped like an egg.

Manar Amer wrote:

Today a second reading of the beam profile was done , with Victor ,Ronic, Aurlien and Manar

an additional set-up was made using two 4 deg wedges instead of High reflecting (HR) and Anti-reflecting (AR) mirrors.

Two reading were taken:

  • at the output of the compressor with a NE30A filter on the beam profiler
  • at the output of the amplifier with NE30A + NE10A filter on beam profiler

 

 

Manar Amer wrote:

Adding the fitted beam in 1D in Horizontal and vertical axis.

for 10%   to  60%

Manar Amer wrote:

 

Manar Amer wrote:

Today: Manar, Ronic and Aurlien started the study of the beam profile of the alphanov amplifier at high power.

The setup shown in the image shows how the power is reduced by using Anti-reflective mirrors,

pick up 1 : Anti-reflective coating on both sides , pick up 2 : Anti-reflective coating on one side and High reflectivity on the other

 

using this method, we avoid saturation and damage to the beam profiler from the high power amplified laser

in addition, an OD3 filter is placed in front of the beam profiler. and a reflective mirror is placed close to deflect the reflection from the mirror(pick up 1) second surface.

The beam observed is relatively well shaped and fitted up to 50% of amplification is where the shape starts to deform a little and is not well-fitted by a Gaussian. (image attached shows the fit for 60% amplification)

The cause is yet to be determined, as it could only be related to the reflections that occur from the mirrors (pick up 1 and pick up 2)

 

*** Note be always careful at High Power :)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Attachment 1: 20220401_Amplifier_AfterCompressor_20perc_133MHz.bmp
Attachment 2: 20220401_Amplifier_AfterCompressor_30perc_133MHz.bmp
Attachment 3: 20220401_Amplifier_AfterCompressor_40perc_133MHz.bmp
Attachment 4: 20220401_Amplifier_AfterCompressor_20perc_133MHz_BeamFit.png
20220401_Amplifier_AfterCompressor_20perc_133MHz_BeamFit.png
Attachment 5: 20220401_Amplifier_AfterCompressor_30perc_133MHz_BeamFit.png
20220401_Amplifier_AfterCompressor_30perc_133MHz_BeamFit.png
Attachment 6: 20220401_Amplifier_AfterCompressor_40perc_133MHz__BeamFit.png
20220401_Amplifier_AfterCompressor_40perc_133MHz__BeamFit.png
  142   Fri Apr 8 13:12:34 2022 Manar AmerFixedreportlasers and opticsThomX iglooAlphanov amplifier Beam Profile

This Morning, another reading was taken for the output of the amplifier after the compressor using 2 wedge mirrors.

In addition, a start of the calibration of a PulseCheck "Autocorrelator" to measure the pulse duration. 

note, the pulsed laser used is OneFive 133.33 MHz

Manar Amer wrote:

Adding the readings  20% , 30% ,  40%  for output of amplifier after the compressor

 

Manar Amer wrote:

Readings of the beam shape and fit at the output of the compressor

differance from previous reading is that here we used wedges instead of HR mirrors.

Similar to previous readings, the beam shape deforms and the Gaussian fit is bad after 50% amplification

Manar Amer wrote:

Readings of the beam shape and horizontal (upper plot) and vertical (lower plot) axis fit at the direct output of the amplifier.

The beam shape relatively shaped like an egg.

Manar Amer wrote:

Today a second reading of the beam profile was done , with Victor ,Ronic, Aurlien and Manar

an additional set-up was made using two 4 deg wedges instead of High reflecting (HR) and Anti-reflecting (AR) mirrors.

Two reading were taken:

  • at the output of the compressor with a NE30A filter on the beam profiler
  • at the output of the amplifier with NE30A + NE10A filter on beam profiler

 

 

Manar Amer wrote:

Adding the fitted beam in 1D in Horizontal and vertical axis.

for 10%   to  60%

Manar Amer wrote:

 

Manar Amer wrote:

Today: Manar, Ronic and Aurlien started the study of the beam profile of the alphanov amplifier at high power.

The setup shown in the image shows how the power is reduced by using Anti-reflective mirrors,

pick up 1 : Anti-reflective coating on both sides , pick up 2 : Anti-reflective coating on one side and High reflectivity on the other

 

using this method, we avoid saturation and damage to the beam profiler from the high power amplified laser

in addition, an OD3 filter is placed in front of the beam profiler. and a reflective mirror is placed close to deflect the reflection from the mirror(pick up 1) second surface.

The beam observed is relatively well shaped and fitted up to 50% of amplification is where the shape starts to deform a little and is not well-fitted by a Gaussian. (image attached shows the fit for 60% amplification)

The cause is yet to be determined, as it could only be related to the reflections that occur from the mirrors (pick up 1 and pick up 2)

 

*** Note be always careful at High Power :)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Attachment 1: 20220408_Amplifier_compressor_20perc.bmp
Attachment 2: 20220408_Amplifier_compressor_40perc.bmp
Attachment 3: 20220408_Amplifier_compressor_60perc.bmp
Attachment 4: 20220408_Amplifier_compressor_70perc.bmp
Attachment 5: 20220408_Amplifier_compressor_80perc.bmp
Attachment 6: 20220408_Amplifier_compressor_90perc.bmp
Attachment 7: 20220408_Amplifier_compressor_BeamFit_20perc.png
20220408_Amplifier_compressor_BeamFit_20perc.png
Attachment 8: 20220408_Amplifier_compressor_BeamFit_40perc.png
20220408_Amplifier_compressor_BeamFit_40perc.png
Attachment 9: 20220408_Amplifier_compressor_BeamFit_60perc.png
20220408_Amplifier_compressor_BeamFit_60perc.png
Attachment 10: 20220408_Amplifier_compressor_BeamFit_70perc.png
20220408_Amplifier_compressor_BeamFit_70perc.png
Attachment 11: 20220408_Amplifier_compressor_BeamFit_80perc.png
20220408_Amplifier_compressor_BeamFit_80perc.png
Attachment 12: 20220408_Amplifier_compressor_BeamFit_90perc.png
20220408_Amplifier_compressor_BeamFit_90perc.png
  144   Fri Apr 8 13:34:54 2022 Manar AmerFixedreportlasers and opticsThomX iglooAlphanov amplifier Beam Pulse Duration

The pulse duration from the amplifier compressor output will be measured using PulseCheck autocorelator

a first alignment of the device was done, continuation in the afternoon.

YouTube link attached of the general operation of pulse check < 5 min :  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J1pNHYySSYg

Attachment 1: pulse-check_compressed.pdf
  145   Fri Apr 8 19:24:32 2022 Manar AmerFixedreportlasers and opticsThomX iglooAlphanov amplifier Beam Pulse Duration

Measurement of the pulse was done at the end of the afternoon, Pulse Duration FWHM = 12.9 ps

After a long process of adjusting the alignment and angle of the crystal inside the device

The power input on the PulseCheck device should be above the sensitivity, in our case we had 1 mW input.

To reach it, we removed one of the wedge mirrors and used dielectric mirrors with an amplification of 20% ~ 25 W direct output power.

The input to the pulsecheck must be horizontally polarized, which is why we used a polarizing beam splitter (PBS).

For a better pulse shape, Victor adjusted the "beam distance" and  "beam focus" nobs on the device.

Manar Amer wrote:

The pulse duration from the amplifier compressor output will be measured using PulseCheck autocorelator

a first alignment of the device was done, continuation in the afternoon.

YouTube link attached of the general operation of pulse check < 5 min :  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J1pNHYySSYg

 

Attachment 1: 20220401_Alphanov_Pulse_Duration.jpg
20220401_Alphanov_Pulse_Duration.jpg
Attachment 2: 20220408_AMplifier_133MHz_Pulse_duration.jpg
20220408_AMplifier_133MHz_Pulse_duration.jpg
Attachment 3: 20220408_AMplifier_133MHz_Pulse_duration_better_alignment.jpg
20220408_AMplifier_133MHz_Pulse_duration_better_alignment.jpg
  146   Fri Apr 8 19:25:16 2022 Manar AmerFixedreportlasers and opticsThomX iglooAlphanov amplifier Beam Pulse Duration

Pulse Duration FWHM = 12.9 ps

Manar Amer wrote:

Measurement of the pulse was done at the end of the afternoon, Pulse Duration FWHM = 12.9 ps

After a long process of adjusting the alignment and angle of the crystal inside the device

The power input on the PulseCheck device should be above the sensitivity, in our case we had 1 mW input.

To reach it, we removed one of the wedge mirrors and used dielectric mirrors with an amplification of 20% ~ 25 W direct output power.

The input to the pulsecheck must be horizontally polarized, which is why we used a polarizing beam splitter (PBS).

For a better pulse shape, Victor adjusted the "beam distance" and  "beam focus" nobs on the device.

Manar Amer wrote:

The pulse duration from the amplifier compressor output will be measured using PulseCheck autocorelator

a first alignment of the device was done, continuation in the afternoon.

YouTube link attached of the general operation of pulse check < 5 min :  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J1pNHYySSYg

 

 

  147   Fri Apr 15 19:00:20 2022 Manar AmerFixedreportlasers and opticsThomX iglooAlphanov amplifier Beam Profile

Victor, Ronic, Manar

Today  was dedicated to the study of the CVBG, and it's effect on the beam profile

we opened the box containing the 2 CVBGs : The 2CVBG are glued from the bottom on a copper surface .

Using the beam viwer, the beam line inside the two CVBG is not at the exact center but not at the edges too and not hitting the boarders.

From the sides you see two lines, one is reflection on the metal.

 

To observe the effect of the first CVBG by itself, we blocked the second reflection into the 2nd CVBG.

By placing the D-shaped mirror just at the entrance of the 2nd CVBG (there was just enough space to put it)

Beam Profiler + OD 10E + OD 30E + OD(not known) placed at ~ 1 m from the output of compressor.

We see clearly a much better circular shape of the beam and a better Gaussian fit,

only above 90% where we see the fit percentage going down to ~ 86% and on just the Horizontal Axis.

 


 

 

 

Manar Amer wrote:

This Morning, another reading was taken for the output of the amplifier after the compressor using 2 wedge mirrors.

In addition, a start of the calibration of a PulseCheck "Autocorrelator" to measure the pulse duration. 

note, the pulsed laser used is OneFive 133.33 MHz

Manar Amer wrote:

Adding the readings  20% , 30% ,  40%  for output of amplifier after the compressor

 

Manar Amer wrote:

Readings of the beam shape and fit at the output of the compressor

differance from previous reading is that here we used wedges instead of HR mirrors.

Similar to previous readings, the beam shape deforms and the Gaussian fit is bad after 50% amplification

Manar Amer wrote:

Readings of the beam shape and horizontal (upper plot) and vertical (lower plot) axis fit at the direct output of the amplifier.

The beam shape relatively shaped like an egg.

Manar Amer wrote:

Today a second reading of the beam profile was done , with Victor ,Ronic, Aurlien and Manar

an additional set-up was made using two 4 deg wedges instead of High reflecting (HR) and Anti-reflecting (AR) mirrors.

Two reading were taken:

  • at the output of the compressor with a NE30A filter on the beam profiler
  • at the output of the amplifier with NE30A + NE10A filter on beam profiler

 

 

Manar Amer wrote:

Adding the fitted beam in 1D in Horizontal and vertical axis.

for 10%   to  60%

Manar Amer wrote:

 

Manar Amer wrote:

Today: Manar, Ronic and Aurlien started the study of the beam profile of the alphanov amplifier at high power.

The setup shown in the image shows how the power is reduced by using Anti-reflective mirrors,

pick up 1 : Anti-reflective coating on both sides , pick up 2 : Anti-reflective coating on one side and High reflectivity on the other

 

using this method, we avoid saturation and damage to the beam profiler from the high power amplified laser

in addition, an OD3 filter is placed in front of the beam profiler. and a reflective mirror is placed close to deflect the reflection from the mirror(pick up 1) second surface.

The beam observed is relatively well shaped and fitted up to 50% of amplification is where the shape starts to deform a little and is not well-fitted by a Gaussian. (image attached shows the fit for 60% amplification)

The cause is yet to be determined, as it could only be related to the reflections that occur from the mirrors (pick up 1 and pick up 2)

 

*** Note be always careful at High Power :)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Attachment 1: 20220415_Inside_CVBG_Box.jpg
20220415_Inside_CVBG_Box.jpg
Attachment 2: 20220415_CVBG.jpg
20220415_CVBG.jpg
Attachment 3: 20220415_Compressor_Box.png
20220415_Compressor_Box.png
Attachment 4: 10p_1CVBG.bmp
Attachment 5: 20p_1CVBG.bmp
Attachment 6: 30p_1CVBG.bmp
Attachment 7: 40p_1CVBG.bmp
Attachment 8: 50p_1CVBG.bmp
Attachment 9: 60p_1CVBG.bmp
Attachment 10: 70p_1CVBG.bmp
Attachment 11: 90p_1CVBG.bmp
Attachment 12: 20220415_D_shaped_Mirror_Blocking_2ndCVBG.jpg
20220415_D_shaped_Mirror_Blocking_2ndCVBG.jpg
Attachment 13: 10p_1CVBG_BeamFit.png
10p_1CVBG_BeamFit.png
Attachment 14: 20p_1CVBG_BeamFit.png
20p_1CVBG_BeamFit.png
Attachment 15: 30p_1CVBG_BeamFit.png
30p_1CVBG_BeamFit.png
Attachment 16: 40p_1CVBG_BeamFit.png
40p_1CVBG_BeamFit.png
Attachment 17: 50p_1CVBG_BeamFit.png
50p_1CVBG_BeamFit.png
Attachment 18: 60p_1CVBG_BeamFit.png
60p_1CVBG_BeamFit.png
Attachment 19: 70p_1CVBG_BeamFit.png
70p_1CVBG_BeamFit.png
Attachment 20: 90p_1CVBG_BeamFit.png
90p_1CVBG_BeamFit.png
  148   Tue Apr 19 12:15:43 2022 Manar AmerFixedreportlasers and opticsThomX iglooAlphanov amplifier Beam Profile

For better comparison ,

the measurements done previously with 2 CVBGs was done at ~ 30 cm and the one done on Friday was for 1 CVBG is at 1 m

so we did additional measurement for 2 CVBGs at 1 m, for 20 , 50 and 70 % amplification 

we clearly see the similar deformation at high power.

Conclusion : the effect is most likely coming from the 2nd CVBG

At 70 % victor optimized the horizontal axis for the injection mirror into 2nd CVBG , we see an improvement in the Gaussian fit on Horizontal and vertical axis of ~ 2%

Manar Amer wrote:

Victor, Ronic, Manar

Today  was dedicated to the study of the CVBG, and it's effect on the beam profile

we opened the box containing the 2 CVBGs : The 2CVBG are glued from the bottom on a copper surface .

Using the beam viwer, the beam line inside the two CVBG is not at the exact center but not at the edges too and not hitting the boarders.

From the sides you see two lines, one is reflection on the metal.

 

To observe the effect of the first CVBG by itself, we blocked the second reflection into the 2nd CVBG.

By placing the D-shaped mirror just at the entrance of the 2nd CVBG (there was just enough space to put it)

Beam Profiler + OD 10E + OD 30E + OD(not known) placed at ~ 1 m from the output of compressor.

We see clearly a much better circular shape of the beam and a better Gaussian fit,

only above 90% where we see the fit percentage going down to ~ 86% and on just the Horizontal Axis.

 


 

 

 

Manar Amer wrote:

This Morning, another reading was taken for the output of the amplifier after the compressor using 2 wedge mirrors.

In addition, a start of the calibration of a PulseCheck "Autocorrelator" to measure the pulse duration. 

note, the pulsed laser used is OneFive 133.33 MHz

Manar Amer wrote:

Adding the readings  20% , 30% ,  40%  for output of amplifier after the compressor

 

Manar Amer wrote:

Readings of the beam shape and fit at the output of the compressor

differance from previous reading is that here we used wedges instead of HR mirrors.

Similar to previous readings, the beam shape deforms and the Gaussian fit is bad after 50% amplification

Manar Amer wrote:

Readings of the beam shape and horizontal (upper plot) and vertical (lower plot) axis fit at the direct output of the amplifier.

The beam shape relatively shaped like an egg.

Manar Amer wrote:

Today a second reading of the beam profile was done , with Victor ,Ronic, Aurlien and Manar

an additional set-up was made using two 4 deg wedges instead of High reflecting (HR) and Anti-reflecting (AR) mirrors.

Two reading were taken:

  • at the output of the compressor with a NE30A filter on the beam profiler
  • at the output of the amplifier with NE30A + NE10A filter on beam profiler

 

 

Manar Amer wrote:

Adding the fitted beam in 1D in Horizontal and vertical axis.

for 10%   to  60%

Manar Amer wrote:

 

Manar Amer wrote:

Today: Manar, Ronic and Aurlien started the study of the beam profile of the alphanov amplifier at high power.

The setup shown in the image shows how the power is reduced by using Anti-reflective mirrors,

pick up 1 : Anti-reflective coating on both sides , pick up 2 : Anti-reflective coating on one side and High reflectivity on the other

 

using this method, we avoid saturation and damage to the beam profiler from the high power amplified laser

in addition, an OD3 filter is placed in front of the beam profiler. and a reflective mirror is placed close to deflect the reflection from the mirror(pick up 1) second surface.

The beam observed is relatively well shaped and fitted up to 50% of amplification is where the shape starts to deform a little and is not well-fitted by a Gaussian. (image attached shows the fit for 60% amplification)

The cause is yet to be determined, as it could only be related to the reflections that occur from the mirrors (pick up 1 and pick up 2)

 

*** Note be always careful at High Power :)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Attachment 1: 20p_2CVBG.bmp
Attachment 2: 50p_2CVBG.bmp
Attachment 3: 70p_2CVBG.bmp
Attachment 4: 70p_2CVBG_CVBG_Input_Mirror_Optimize.bmp
Attachment 5: 20p_2CVBG_BeamFit.png
20p_2CVBG_BeamFit.png
Attachment 6: 50p_2CVBG_BeamFit.png
50p_2CVBG_BeamFit.png
Attachment 7: 70p_2CVBG_BeamFit.png
70p_2CVBG_BeamFit.png
Attachment 8: 70p_2CVBG_CVBG_Input_Mirror_Optimize_BeamFit.png
70p_2CVBG_CVBG_Input_Mirror_Optimize_BeamFit.png
  178   Mon Jan 9 14:03:16 2023 Manar AmerFixedreportlasers and optics | detectors and electronicsThomX iglooAlphanov amplifier beam profile Data

Adding the schematic of the measurements.,

the 4° Beam Deviation, AR Coating ( B coating)

The 3 data points taken of the beam profile are fitted in Gaussian Beam with taking the beam waist at the output of the compressor box.

Background is subtracted for all data points, the fit is more than 90% for all points.

a reading was observed with distance less than 200 cm before the periscope and the fit starts to degrade

reason probably be related to the bump beam !!! To be investigated by placing an iris.

Attachment 1: 2023_Alphanov_Beam_Profile_setup.jpg
2023_Alphanov_Beam_Profile_setup.jpg
Attachment 2: 20230109_beamprifile_20perc_ampli_X0.bmp
Attachment 3: 20230109_beamprifile_20perc_ampli_X60.bmp
Attachment 4: 20230109_beamprifile_20perc_ampli_X120.bmp
Attachment 5: 20230109_beamprifile_20perc_ampli_X0_fit.jpg
20230109_beamprifile_20perc_ampli_X0_fit.jpg
Attachment 6: 20230109_beamprifile_20perc_ampli_X60_fit.jpg
20230109_beamprifile_20perc_ampli_X60_fit.jpg
Attachment 7: 20230109_beamprifile_20perc_ampli_X120_fit.jpg
20230109_beamprifile_20perc_ampli_X120_fit.jpg
Attachment 8: Beam_data_fit.jpg
Beam_data_fit.jpg
  183   Mon Jan 30 17:40:10 2023 Manar AmerFixedreportlasers and optics | detectors and electronicsThomX iglooAlphanov amplifier beam profile Data

This Morning with Victor the amplifier was turned on @ 20% amplification (output ~ 9 W ) for approximately 3 hours and no error appeared.

I took data of the beam profile at different points without a lens after the 2 wedges 

@ 0% (only pump beam), output ~ 300 mW (taken from previous data) , output after 2 wedges 2.2 uW  

@ 20% amplification , output ~ 9 W (taken from previous data) , output after 2 wedges 58.6 uW

fit to be added after processing the Beam Profiles data files.

Data with the lens to be taken !!

Manar Amer wrote:

Adding the schematic of the measurements.,

the 4° Beam Deviation, AR Coating ( B coating)

The 3 data points taken of the beam profile are fitted in Gaussian Beam with taking the beam waist at the output of the compressor box.

Background is subtracted for all data points, the fit is more than 90% for all points.

a reading was observed with distance less than 200 cm before the periscope and the fit starts to degrade

reason probably be related to the bump beam !!! To be investigated by placing an iris.

 

  195   Tue Mar 14 16:54:48 2023 Manar AmerFixedreportlasers and optics | detectors and electronicsThomX iglooAmplifier Beam Profile over time

This morning, with Ronic, we opened the compressor box to observe if there is any misalignment of the mounts or the CVBG's

a comparison slide between the Beam Profile over time and measurements we have taken, is included.
 
we noticed today that the images need a rotation, and I took the assumption we did not rotate last year and did the rotation of the previous images.
Comparing the last two images, they look slightly similar. but the one from last year is much better than the current one
(remembering it was taken, when we aligned the CVBG's and the chiller was @23, now the temperature is @25 for the chiller)
 
The image we took today is also better than the one from yesterday.
(we take the image when the compressor box is open)

Attachment 1: comparision_Between_Beam_profile_over_time.jpg
comparision_Between_Beam_profile_over_time.jpg
  196   Wed Mar 15 21:13:07 2023 Manar AmerFixedreportlasers and optics | detectors and electronicsThomX iglooAmplifier Beam Profile over time

This morning we took data of the beam profile at 4 different points to see the evolution of

  • the beam shape
  • divergence

over distance for all amplification percentages

Data plotted for the distance vs radius for all and divergence in rad is extracted and plotted as a variation of amplification power.

Added is the Excel file with all the details and the PowerPoint for referance

Manar Amer wrote:

This morning, with Ronic, we opened the compressor box to observe if there is any misalignment of the mounts or the CVBG's

a comparison slide between the Beam Profile over time and measurements we have taken, is included.
 
we noticed today that the images need a rotation, and I took the assumption we did not rotate last year and did the rotation of the previous images.
Comparing the last two images, they look slightly similar. but the one from last year is much better than the current one
(remembering it was taken, when we aligned the CVBG's and the chiller was @23, now the temperature is @25 for the chiller)
 
The image we took today is also better than the one from yesterday.
(we take the image when the compressor box is open)

 

Attachment 1: Beam_wavefront_setup.jpg
Beam_wavefront_setup.jpg
Attachment 2: Slide2.JPG
Slide2.JPG
Attachment 3: Slide3.JPG
Slide3.JPG
Attachment 4: Slide4.JPG
Slide4.JPG
Attachment 5: Slide5.JPG
Slide5.JPG
Attachment 6: Slide6.JPG
Slide6.JPG
Attachment 7: Slide7.JPG
Slide7.JPG
Attachment 8: Slide8.JPG
Slide8.JPG
Attachment 9: Slide9.JPG
Slide9.JPG
Attachment 10: 20230315_Data.xlsx
  197   Wed Mar 15 21:14:51 2023 Manar AmerFixedreportlasers and optics | detectors and electronicsThomX iglooAmplifier Beam Profile over time

Information about today's work is added to logBook !!

Manar Amer wrote:

This morning we took data of the beam profile at 4 different points to see the evolution of

  • the beam shape
  • divergence

over distance for all amplification percentages

Data plotted for the distance vs radius for all and divergence in rad is extracted and plotted as a variation of amplification power.

Added is the Excel file with all the details and the PowerPoint for referance

Manar Amer wrote:

This morning, with Ronic, we opened the compressor box to observe if there is any misalignment of the mounts or the CVBG's

a comparison slide between the Beam Profile over time and measurements we have taken, is included.
 
we noticed today that the images need a rotation, and I took the assumption we did not rotate last year and did the rotation of the previous images.
Comparing the last two images, they look slightly similar. but the one from last year is much better than the current one
(remembering it was taken, when we aligned the CVBG's and the chiller was @23, now the temperature is @25 for the chiller)
 
The image we took today is also better than the one from yesterday.
(we take the image when the compressor box is open)

 

 

  198   Fri Mar 17 18:54:19 2023 Manar AmerFixedreportlasers and opticsOptical roomNew Mirrors from LMA _ Images

Today we tested a mirror from one patch

image is for the front face of the mirror

PowerPoint has more details about the images

 

 

Attachment 1: 20230317_Images_of_New_Mirrors-compressed.pptx
Attachment 2: Mirror_Tested.jpg
Mirror_Tested.jpg
Attachment 3: WhatsApp_Image_2023-03-17_at_6.39.44_PM.jpg
WhatsApp_Image_2023-03-17_at_6.39.44_PM.jpg
Attachment 4: image006.jpg
image006.jpg
  203   Tue Mar 28 13:56:52 2023 Manar AmerFixedreportlasers and optics | detectors and electronicsThomX iglooCavity Alighnment

Last week, with Ronic and Victor we aligned the cavity using CW laser (Koheras)

  • we have also installed 4 mirrors in the cavity with the best theoretical qualities (serial number and images included)
    • The Plan ULE mirror P4 thickness was not compatible with the piezoelectric mount. We had to install a metal spacer behind the mirror to be able to fix it. the metal spacers in from ThorLabs made from INOX, It is 1 inch diameter (25.4 mm), we drilled a hole in the middle of 15 mm in the Workshop in bat 200. Then cleaned it using an ultrasound bath in pure water, using a small Ultrasound bath machine in Maverics platform Vide and Surfaces next to ThomX eglo.
    •  
    • This gives some difficulties in imaging the transmission at P4. To help with the imaging, we used the plastic #D printed irises that Yann made long time ago
    • we took images of the mode inside the cavity at P4 transmission.

 

  • We also observed some oxidization on the metal bars of the controllers, more on the side of S2 and P4. we are yet to test the motion of the motors in the z-axis.
  • Friday evening we closed the windows using a new copper rings (last one we have, Ronic placed a new order).
  • The pump was turned on by Bruno and Eric yesterday afternoon. The current vacuum level is 6-7*10^-6 mbar

the pre and the turbo pimps are on so still too noisy to work, we have access all day tomorrow.

 

 

 

Attachment 1: 20230328_Mirror_Used.jpg
20230328_Mirror_Used.jpg
Attachment 2: WhatsApp_Image_2023-03-28_at_12.18.17_PM(1).jpg
WhatsApp_Image_2023-03-28_at_12.18.17_PM(1).jpg
Attachment 3: WhatsApp_Image_2023-03-23_at_11.32.39_AM(3).jpg
WhatsApp_Image_2023-03-23_at_11.32.39_AM(3).jpg
Attachment 4: WhatsApp_Image_2023-03-28_at_12.18.16_PM(4).jpg
WhatsApp_Image_2023-03-28_at_12.18.16_PM(4).jpg
Attachment 5: iris_4mm_P4__reduced.png
iris_4mm_P4__reduced.png
Attachment 6: iris_ouvert_a_fond_P4___reduced.png
iris_ouvert_a_fond_P4___reduced.png
Attachment 7: 20230324_Transmission_S3.jpg
20230324_Transmission_S3.jpg
Attachment 8: Image_of_P1_S3_window_open_Oxidization_shown.jpg
Image_of_P1_S3_window_open_Oxidization_shown.jpg
Attachment 9: Image_of_P4_S2_window_open_Oxidization_shown.jpg
Image_of_P4_S2_window_open_Oxidization_shown.jpg
  204   Tue Apr 4 13:03:23 2023 Manar AmerFixedreportlasers and optics | vacuum | detectors and electronicsThomX iglooCavity Alighnment

Today, we prepared lenses for a telescope for the CW laser injection into the cavity, yet to be installed

Image of the transmission at P4 attached, an estimation of the beam size of the mode see is ~ 5.5 mm 

The vacuum in the 2 optical cavities is decreasing but slowly. today it is 2.6 - 2.4 * 10^-7 mbar

Manar Amer wrote:

Last week, with Ronic and Victor we aligned the cavity using CW laser (Koheras)

  • we have also installed 4 mirrors in the cavity with the best theoretical qualities (serial number and images included)
    • The Plan ULE mirror P4 thickness was not compatible with the piezoelectric mount. We had to install a metal spacer behind the mirror to be able to fix it. the metal spacers in from ThorLabs made from INOX, It is 1 inch diameter (25.4 mm), we drilled a hole in the middle of 15 mm in the Workshop in bat 200. Then cleaned it using an ultrasound bath in pure water, using a small Ultrasound bath machine in Maverics platform Vide and Surfaces next to ThomX eglo.
    •  
    • This gives some difficulties in imaging the transmission at P4. To help with the imaging, we used the plastic #D printed irises that Yann made long time ago
    • we took images of the mode inside the cavity at P4 transmission.

 

  • We also observed some oxidization on the metal bars of the controllers, more on the side of S2 and P4. we are yet to test the motion of the motors in the z-axis.
  • Friday evening we closed the windows using a new copper rings (last one we have, Ronic placed a new order).
  • The pump was turned on by Bruno and Eric yesterday afternoon. The current vacuum level is 6-7*10^-6 mbar

the pre and the turbo pimps are on so still too noisy to work, we have access all day tomorrow.

 

 

 

 

Attachment 1: 20230404_P4_Transmission.jpg
20230404_P4_Transmission.jpg
Attachment 2: 20230404_vacuum_level.jpg
20230404_vacuum_level.jpg
  205   Fri Apr 7 00:26:11 2023 Manar AmerFixedreportlasers and optics | detectors and electronicsThomX iglooCW FP Cavit lock

Yesterday morning we locked the cavity on a strange mode in the cavity (we call it mode, but not sure what it is ??)

we also managed to lock on a higher order mode 02

we get an estimated 30% coupling (expected value), and note that we have not installed a telescope yet.

 

Manar Amer wrote:

Today, we prepared lenses for a telescope for the CW laser injection into the cavity, yet to be installed

Image of the transmission at P4 attached, an estimation of the beam size of the mode see is ~ 5.5 mm 

The vacuum in the 2 optical cavities is decreasing but slowly. today it is 2.6 - 2.4 * 10^-7 mbar

Manar Amer wrote:

Last week, with Ronic and Victor we aligned the cavity using CW laser (Koheras)

  • we have also installed 4 mirrors in the cavity with the best theoretical qualities (serial number and images included)
    • The Plan ULE mirror P4 thickness was not compatible with the piezoelectric mount. We had to install a metal spacer behind the mirror to be able to fix it. the metal spacers in from ThorLabs made from INOX, It is 1 inch diameter (25.4 mm), we drilled a hole in the middle of 15 mm in the Workshop in bat 200. Then cleaned it using an ultrasound bath in pure water, using a small Ultrasound bath machine in Maverics platform Vide and Surfaces next to ThomX eglo.
    •  
    • This gives some difficulties in imaging the transmission at P4. To help with the imaging, we used the plastic #D printed irises that Yann made long time ago
    • we took images of the mode inside the cavity at P4 transmission.

 

  • We also observed some oxidization on the metal bars of the controllers, more on the side of S2 and P4. we are yet to test the motion of the motors in the z-axis.
  • Friday evening we closed the windows using a new copper rings (last one we have, Ronic placed a new order).
  • The pump was turned on by Bruno and Eric yesterday afternoon. The current vacuum level is 6-7*10^-6 mbar

the pre and the turbo pimps are on so still too noisy to work, we have access all day tomorrow.

 

 

 

 

 

Attachment 1: 20230406_setup.jpg
20230406_setup.jpg
Attachment 2: 20230406_transmission_S2-P4.jpg
20230406_transmission_S2-P4.jpg
Attachment 3: 20230406_Cavity_Lock.jpg
20230406_Cavity_Lock.jpg
  206   Fri Apr 7 15:56:40 2023 Manar AmerFixedreportlasers and optics | detectors and electronicsThomX iglooCW FP Cavit lock

This morning with Daniele and Viktor,

- we confirmed the "potato" mode was well centered on the injected beam and was not due to some misalignment of the injected beam compared to the cavity axis.
we look at the reflected beam during a lock. we can see the direct reflected beam superposed with the cavity mode (cf attached image).

- then we assumed the "potato" mode problem could come from the too short distance between spherical mirrors which introduces ellipticity and finally can lead to some instability.
we manage to move further spherical mirrors S2 and S3 by moving them from 1 350 000 to 800 000 steps.
=> we increased the distance by 2x 550 000 steps (with 6µm for 1000 steps) => we increased the distance between spherical mirrors by 6.6 mm
the new mode shrinked a lot and at the end was spherical at 73%.
the mode size is now about 4400 x 6000 µm but with the major and minor axis still at 45° !
 

Manar Amer wrote:

Yesterday morning we locked the cavity on a strange mode in the cavity (we call it mode, but not sure what it is ??)

we also managed to lock on a higher order mode 02

we get an estimated 30% coupling (expected value), and note that we have not installed a telescope yet.

 

Manar Amer wrote:

Today, we prepared lenses for a telescope for the CW laser injection into the cavity, yet to be installed

Image of the transmission at P4 attached, an estimation of the beam size of the mode see is ~ 5.5 mm 

The vacuum in the 2 optical cavities is decreasing but slowly. today it is 2.6 - 2.4 * 10^-7 mbar

Manar Amer wrote:

Last week, with Ronic and Victor we aligned the cavity using CW laser (Koheras)

  • we have also installed 4 mirrors in the cavity with the best theoretical qualities (serial number and images included)
    • The Plan ULE mirror P4 thickness was not compatible with the piezoelectric mount. We had to install a metal spacer behind the mirror to be able to fix it. the metal spacers in from ThorLabs made from INOX, It is 1 inch diameter (25.4 mm), we drilled a hole in the middle of 15 mm in the Workshop in bat 200. Then cleaned it using an ultrasound bath in pure water, using a small Ultrasound bath machine in Maverics platform Vide and Surfaces next to ThomX eglo.
    •  
    • This gives some difficulties in imaging the transmission at P4. To help with the imaging, we used the plastic #D printed irises that Yann made long time ago
    • we took images of the mode inside the cavity at P4 transmission.

 

  • We also observed some oxidization on the metal bars of the controllers, more on the side of S2 and P4. we are yet to test the motion of the motors in the z-axis.
  • Friday evening we closed the windows using a new copper rings (last one we have, Ronic placed a new order).
  • The pump was turned on by Bruno and Eric yesterday afternoon. The current vacuum level is 6-7*10^-6 mbar

the pre and the turbo pimps are on so still too noisy to work, we have access all day tomorrow.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Attachment 1: 20230407_103103-2.jpg
20230407_103103-2.jpg
ELOG V3.1.4-395e101