HOME SBOX THOMX MINICAV Utilities
SBOX orders SBOX installation SBOX commissioning SBOX control command
  Status of commissioning, report also here plots are reports., Page 7 of 13  Not logged in ELOG logo
ID Date Author Status Type Categorydown Location Title
  61   Tue Jan 5 12:38:04 2021 Manar AmerFixedreportlasers and opticsOptical roomTransmission Measurements for the Mirrors.
  • Thursday 10 December 2020:   First Test Measurement - Inside Box
    •  The transmission ( T ) for the mirrors of SBOX and ThomX was measured over a range from the center of the mirror up to 5mm.
    •  
    • The first setup was initially done while the mirrorr is installed inside the metal box, when measuring T we observe that there is an erregular  change in the power measured as we move azay from the center of the mirror, this was due to reflection of light inside the box. The reflection from the mirror was reflected on the metal inside the box and it was measured by the power meter.

               (so for this setup we only took measrements for T along the center of the mirror)

The file stating the measurements is : Test Cavity _ Mirrors transmission _ Inside box

=======================================================================

  • Tuesday 15 December 2020 :  Second Test - Outside Box
    • The setup for T test was moved outside the metal box with the same distances between the injection beam and mirror ~ 50 cm. and the distance between the injection laser and the mirror next to it ~ 9 cm.
    •  
    • Observation for T is done at full angle and at half angle of reflection ( the mirror was tilted to achive this )
    •  
    • we observed that after each change in the distance from the center the power meter needed to be aligned to have the max power.
    • after doing all the measurements for the range from the center we made it again for the center only and the consistance of the transmission was good.

The file stating the measurements is : Test Cavity _ Mirrors transmission _ outside box

note: the laser used for the test is the Koheras

details on the pwer used, mirrors, power meter, filters, ....etc are shown in the Excel data sheets

Done By : Loic , Manar and Ahmed

Attachment 1: Test_Cavity___Mirrors_transmission___Inside_box.xlsx
Attachment 2: Test_Cavity___Mirrors_transmission___outside_box.xlsx
Attachment 3: set_up_for_transmission_measurement_outside_box.jpeg
set_up_for_transmission_measurement_outside_box.jpeg
Attachment 4: setup_fot_T_measurement_Injection_laser_and_mirrors_reflected_on_at_angle_and_half_angle.jpeg
setup_fot_T_measurement_Injection_laser_and_mirrors_reflected_on_at_angle_and_half_angle.jpeg
Attachment 5: Mirrors_Tested.jpeg
Mirrors_Tested.jpeg
Attachment 6: set_up_for_mirror_and_power_meter.jpeg
set_up_for_mirror_and_power_meter.jpeg
  62   Tue Jan 12 10:44:57 2021 Ronic ChicheFixedissuelasers and opticsOptical roomOrigami SN2440 133MHz laser power measurment... and failure

we received from NKT the Origami SN2440 133MHz oscillator from repair on 2020/12/17
and we measured the power trend from 2020/12/21 until the whole winter Hollyday, during 14 days and 17h (1 273 334 s).
the power was quite constant, about 58mW (the measurement has been done with the OD2 filter and using a (x20) factor in the software to compensate for it),
except for some peaks at the beginning of the measurement to 60.7mW.
I tried to reproduce these peaks by switching on several lights in the room and the airflow ceil but the effect is neglectable,
thus these peaks seem to really come from the oscillator power.

at the beginning of January, the oscillator suffered a back reflection from the rugged anodized convex surface of the power meter (apparently not from the OD2 filter itself) and the laser stopped immediately to modelock.
the laser power dropped to 0 and the laser controller led started to blink red. NKT has been contacted and they think it could be the laser pump diodes that have been damaged.

for the future, we will have to install a fixed optical isolator from the start, even for short operations.

 

Attachment 1: 133mhzpower.PNG
133mhzpower.PNG
Attachment 2: 133mhz_power_zoom.png
133mhz_power_zoom.png
  63   Thu Jun 10 17:55:15 2021 Ronic ChicheFixedinfolasers and opticsOptical roomOrigami SN2440 133MHz laser tests

Today, we received the Origami SN2440 133MHz oscillator from repair (NKT mentioned a defective wire inside the controller....)

We immediately installed it behind an isolator (Faraday rotator+PBS+halfwave plate).

the output power is around 60mW.
the spectrum is around 1030nm
the repetition rate is around 133.33MHz

Attachment 1: IMG_20210610_161502.jpg
IMG_20210610_161502.jpg
Attachment 2: spectre_133MHz.PNG
spectre_133MHz.PNG
Attachment 3: Screen_0015.png
Screen_0015.png
  76   Wed Apr 20 19:05:37 2022 Manar AmerFixedreportlasers and opticsOptical roomKBox Alignment

Starting with the alignment of the KBox using CW Koheras.

The size of the CW output from the collimator at 1 meter from is ~ 2.4 mm, to be adjusted with lenses to match the cavity !!! (attached image)

For the 2 alignment mirrors, I am only able to control 3 axes for now (motor issue for the fourth to be fixed !!) , Horizontal and vertical for Ma1 and Horizontal for Ma2(closes to injection window).

Started with only irises placed on both the M1 and M2. Placed a beam profiler at the window behind M2 to observe an output beam.

Motors position for the 3 axes and beam shape and position after M2 attached.

Attachment 1: CW_Koheras_1meter_ColimatorOutput_NE40A_NE10B_NE01A_Beam.bmp
Attachment 2: CW_Koheras_1meter_ColimatorOutput_NE40A_NE10B_NE01A_BeamFit.png
CW_Koheras_1meter_ColimatorOutput_NE40A_NE10B_NE01A_BeamFit.png
Attachment 3: Ma1_Horizontal_Position.png
Ma1_Horizontal_Position.png
Attachment 4: Ma1_Vertical_Position.png
Ma1_Vertical_Position.png
Attachment 5: Ma2_Horizontal_Position.png
Ma2_Horizontal_Position.png
Attachment 6: Transmission_M2_Irises_No_Mirrors_Beam.jpg
Transmission_M2_Irises_No_Mirrors_Beam.jpg
Attachment 7: Transmission_M2_Irises_No_Mirrors_BeamFit.png
Transmission_M2_Irises_No_Mirrors_BeamFit.png
  77   Mon Apr 25 17:28:29 2022 Manar AmerFixedreportlasers and opticsOptical roomSBox Alignment

SBox alignment, using CW laser Koheras power 1 mW

  • Finished M1 and M2 alignment using the diffraction patterns seen on the beam profiler,  the beam fit is not very good ?? (image taken)
  • Positions of Ma1 and Ma2 motors are registered (image taken)
  • Placed Fixed 2 irises at M1 window and M2 window (Image taken while both are closed)
  • Distance between the collimator and beam profiler ~ 2 m
  • Distance between collimator and M1 diaphragm   ~ 1 m
  • Distance between collimator and M2 diaphragm ~ 1.6 m 

 

Manar Amer wrote:

Starting with the alignment of the KBox using CW Koheras.

The size of the CW output from the collimator at 1 meter from is ~ 2.4 mm, to be adjusted with lenses to match the cavity !!! (attached image)

For the 2 alignment mirrors, I am only able to control 3 axes for now (motor issue for the fourth to be fixed !!) , Horizontal and vertical for Ma1 and Horizontal for Ma2(closes to injection window).

Started with only irises placed on both the M1 and M2. Placed a beam profiler at the window behind M2 to observe an output beam.

Motors position for the 3 axes and beam shape and position after M2 attached.

 

Attachment 1: SBox_Setup.jpg
SBox_Setup.jpg
Attachment 2: Ma1_Ma2_Horizontal_Position.png
Ma1_Ma2_Horizontal_Position.png
Attachment 3: Ma1_Ma2_Vertical_Position.png
Ma1_Ma2_Vertical_Position.png
Attachment 4: Output_afterM2_Diaghragm_On_M1_M2_Beam.jpg
Output_afterM2_Diaghragm_On_M1_M2_Beam.jpg
Attachment 5: Output_afterM2_Diaghragm_On_M1_M2_BeamFit.png
Output_afterM2_Diaghragm_On_M1_M2_BeamFit.png
Attachment 6: Output_afterM2_Diaghragm_On_M1_M2_Beam_Outside_Irises_Installed_and_Closed.jpg
Output_afterM2_Diaghragm_On_M1_M2_Beam_Outside_Irises_Installed_and_Closed.jpg
  78   Mon Apr 25 17:58:01 2022 Manar AmerFixedreportlasers and opticsOptical roomSBox Alignment

After pointers and Advice from Aurélien,

improvement of the beam alignment through M1 and M2 irises was done.

To improve the image on the beam profiler, I cleaned the alignment mirrors and the windows using pure ethanol and optical lens cleaning tissue,

a significant improvement after cleaning the inside of M2 Window. Images have less dust diffraction rings.

Attached new images of the beam:

  • New Ma1 and Ma2 motor position
  • After M1 pinhole optimized (saturated)
  • After M2 and M1 pinhole optimizing (saturated and not)
Manar Amer wrote:

SBox alignment, using CW laser Koheras power 1 mW

  • Finished M1 and M2 alignment using the diffraction patterns seen on the beam profiler,  the beam fit is not very good ?? (image taken)
  • Positions of Ma1 and Ma2 motors are registered (image taken)
  • Placed Fixed 2 irises at M1 window and M2 window (Image taken while both are closed)
  • Distance between the collimator and beam profiler ~ 2 m
  • Distance between collimator and M1 diaphragm   ~ 1 m
  • Distance between collimator and M2 diaphragm ~ 1.6 m 

 

Manar Amer wrote:

Starting with the alignment of the KBox using CW Koheras.

The size of the CW output from the collimator at 1 meter from is ~ 2.4 mm, to be adjusted with lenses to match the cavity !!! (attached image)

For the 2 alignment mirrors, I am only able to control 3 axes for now (motor issue for the fourth to be fixed !!) , Horizontal and vertical for Ma1 and Horizontal for Ma2(closes to injection window).

Started with only irises placed on both the M1 and M2. Placed a beam profiler at the window behind M2 to observe an output beam.

Motors position for the 3 axes and beam shape and position after M2 attached.

 

 

Attachment 1: Ma1_Ma2_Horizontal_Position_Optimized.png
Ma1_Ma2_Horizontal_Position_Optimized.png
Attachment 2: Ma1_Ma2_Vertical_Position_Optimized.png
Ma1_Ma2_Vertical_Position_Optimized.png
Attachment 3: After_M1_diaphram_1m_Saturated_Beam_Optimized.jpg
After_M1_diaphram_1m_Saturated_Beam_Optimized.jpg
Attachment 4: After_M2_M1_diaphram_Saturated_Beam_Optimized.jpg
After_M2_M1_diaphram_Saturated_Beam_Optimized.jpg
Attachment 5: After_M2_M1_diaphram_Beam_Optimized.jpg
After_M2_M1_diaphram_Beam_Optimized.jpg
  79   Mon Apr 25 18:02:09 2022 Manar AmerFixedreportlasers and opticsOptical roomSBox Alignment

Remember to update the position of the reference Irises tomorrow !!!!

Manar Amer wrote:

After pointers and Advice from Aurélien,

improvement of the beam alignment through M1 and M2 irises was done.

To improve the image on the beam profiler, I cleaned the alignment mirrors and the windows using pure ethanol and optical lens cleaning tissue,

a significant improvement after cleaning the inside of M2 Window. Images have less dust diffraction rings.

Attached new images of the beam:

  • New Ma1 and Ma2 motor position
  • After M1 pinhole optimized (saturated)
  • After M2 and M1 pinhole optimizing (saturated and not)
Manar Amer wrote:

SBox alignment, using CW laser Koheras power 1 mW

  • Finished M1 and M2 alignment using the diffraction patterns seen on the beam profiler,  the beam fit is not very good ?? (image taken)
  • Positions of Ma1 and Ma2 motors are registered (image taken)
  • Placed Fixed 2 irises at M1 window and M2 window (Image taken while both are closed)
  • Distance between the collimator and beam profiler ~ 2 m
  • Distance between collimator and M1 diaphragm   ~ 1 m
  • Distance between collimator and M2 diaphragm ~ 1.6 m 

 

Manar Amer wrote:

Starting with the alignment of the KBox using CW Koheras.

The size of the CW output from the collimator at 1 meter from is ~ 2.4 mm, to be adjusted with lenses to match the cavity !!! (attached image)

For the 2 alignment mirrors, I am only able to control 3 axes for now (motor issue for the fourth to be fixed !!) , Horizontal and vertical for Ma1 and Horizontal for Ma2(closes to injection window).

Started with only irises placed on both the M1 and M2. Placed a beam profiler at the window behind M2 to observe an output beam.

Motors position for the 3 axes and beam shape and position after M2 attached.

 

 

 

  80   Tue Apr 26 20:08:10 2022 Manar AmerFixedreportlasers and opticsOptical roomSBox Alignment
  • Adjust the placement of the Irises  (done at the start of the day, adjusted at the end when M1 mirror was placed)
  • Improvement on the Ma1 and Ma2 (The Alignment Mirrors)
    • Improves the alignment a bit. There is an observation where there is no symmetry in the image, concluded to be because of the pinholes that are usually used for the alignment the circle cut is not symmetric (took images on phone of pinholes)
    • This explains why, for the pinhole used on M1, we see a little more symmetry than the pinhole used on M2. 
    •  
    • Placed M1 mirror from Sbox (with damage spot in the middle), after cleaning it using the spincoater, only used to adjust the injection into the mirror where it will give Horizontal displacement due to the thickness of the mirror.
    • Last position of the motors attached
  • Installed the 2 dielectric mirrors for the reflection line
  • Did a rough alignment for the reflection line to have it exit through the reflection window.

Note about mirrors : They were cleaned a year a go and placed in the boxes. When opened the box and seen under microscope they were very dirty with dust particle 

Specially from the back, I believe the boxes have dust in them (to be verified under the UV light /  Microscope  !!!!!!!! )

 

Manar Amer wrote:

Remember to update the position of the reference Irises tomorrow !!!!

Manar Amer wrote:

After pointers and Advice from Aurélien,

improvement of the beam alignment through M1 and M2 irises was done.

To improve the image on the beam profiler, I cleaned the alignment mirrors and the windows using pure ethanol and optical lens cleaning tissue,

a significant improvement after cleaning the inside of M2 Window. Images have less dust diffraction rings.

Attached new images of the beam:

  • New Ma1 and Ma2 motor position
  • After M1 pinhole optimized (saturated)
  • After M2 and M1 pinhole optimizing (saturated and not)
Manar Amer wrote:

SBox alignment, using CW laser Koheras power 1 mW

  • Finished M1 and M2 alignment using the diffraction patterns seen on the beam profiler,  the beam fit is not very good ?? (image taken)
  • Positions of Ma1 and Ma2 motors are registered (image taken)
  • Placed Fixed 2 irises at M1 window and M2 window (Image taken while both are closed)
  • Distance between the collimator and beam profiler ~ 2 m
  • Distance between collimator and M1 diaphragm   ~ 1 m
  • Distance between collimator and M2 diaphragm ~ 1.6 m 

 

Manar Amer wrote:

Starting with the alignment of the KBox using CW Koheras.

The size of the CW output from the collimator at 1 meter from is ~ 2.4 mm, to be adjusted with lenses to match the cavity !!! (attached image)

For the 2 alignment mirrors, I am only able to control 3 axes for now (motor issue for the fourth to be fixed !!) , Horizontal and vertical for Ma1 and Horizontal for Ma2(closes to injection window).

Started with only irises placed on both the M1 and M2. Placed a beam profiler at the window behind M2 to observe an output beam.

Motors position for the 3 axes and beam shape and position after M2 attached.

 

 

 

 

Attachment 1: Pinhole_One.jpg
Pinhole_One.jpg
Attachment 2: Pinhole_Two.jpg
Pinhole_Two.jpg
Attachment 3: After_M1_diaphram_Saturated_Beam_Optimized.jpg
After_M1_diaphram_Saturated_Beam_Optimized.jpg
Attachment 4: After_M2_diaphram_Saturated_Beam_Optimized.jpg
After_M2_diaphram_Saturated_Beam_Optimized.jpg
Attachment 5: both_diaphrams_M1_M2.jpg
both_diaphrams_M1_M2.jpg
Attachment 6: both_diaphrams_M1_M2_Optimized.jpg
both_diaphrams_M1_M2_Optimized.jpg
Attachment 7: After_M2_diaphram_M1_Mirror_Installed_SBox_Saturated_Beam_Optimized.jpg
After_M2_diaphram_M1_Mirror_Installed_SBox_Saturated_Beam_Optimized.jpg
Attachment 8: Ma1_Ma2_Horizontal_Position_Optimized_M1_Mirror_Installes_SBox.png
Ma1_Ma2_Horizontal_Position_Optimized_M1_Mirror_Installes_SBox.png
Attachment 9: Ma1_Ma2_Vertical_Position_Optimized_M1_Mirror_Installes_SBox.png
Ma1_Ma2_Vertical_Position_Optimized_M1_Mirror_Installes_SBox.png
  81   Wed Apr 27 22:13:37 2022 Manar AmerFixedreportlasers and opticsOptical roomSBox Alignment

Finished the alignment of the SBox with M1 of SBox placed, to be changed to gamma factory mirror later

Observed what seems to be transmission through M2 mirror, to be confirmed. image attached shows it

a PowerPoint attached showing the details of today's work.

 

 

Manar Amer wrote:
  • Adjust the placement of the Irises  (done at the start of the day, adjusted at the end when M1 mirror was placed)
  • Improvement on the Ma1 and Ma2 (The Alignment Mirrors)
    • Improves the alignment a bit. There is an observation where there is no symmetry in the image, concluded to be because of the pinholes that are usually used for the alignment the circle cut is not symmetric (took images on phone of pinholes)
    • This explains why, for the pinhole used on M1, we see a little more symmetry than the pinhole used on M2. 
    •  
    • Placed M1 mirror from Sbox (with damage spot in the middle), after cleaning it using the spincoater, only used to adjust the injection into the mirror where it will give Horizontal displacement due to the thickness of the mirror.
    • Last position of the motors attached
  • Installed the 2 dielectric mirrors for the reflection line
  • Did a rough alignment for the reflection line to have it exit through the reflection window.

Note about mirrors : They were cleaned a year a go and placed in the boxes. When opened the box and seen under microscope they were very dirty with dust particle 

Specially from the back, I believe the boxes have dust in them (to be verified under the UV light /  Microscope  !!!!!!!! )

 

Manar Amer wrote:

Remember to update the position of the reference Irises tomorrow !!!!

Manar Amer wrote:

After pointers and Advice from Aurélien,

improvement of the beam alignment through M1 and M2 irises was done.

To improve the image on the beam profiler, I cleaned the alignment mirrors and the windows using pure ethanol and optical lens cleaning tissue,

a significant improvement after cleaning the inside of M2 Window. Images have less dust diffraction rings.

Attached new images of the beam:

  • New Ma1 and Ma2 motor position
  • After M1 pinhole optimized (saturated)
  • After M2 and M1 pinhole optimizing (saturated and not)
Manar Amer wrote:

SBox alignment, using CW laser Koheras power 1 mW

  • Finished M1 and M2 alignment using the diffraction patterns seen on the beam profiler,  the beam fit is not very good ?? (image taken)
  • Positions of Ma1 and Ma2 motors are registered (image taken)
  • Placed Fixed 2 irises at M1 window and M2 window (Image taken while both are closed)
  • Distance between the collimator and beam profiler ~ 2 m
  • Distance between collimator and M1 diaphragm   ~ 1 m
  • Distance between collimator and M2 diaphragm ~ 1.6 m 

 

Manar Amer wrote:

Starting with the alignment of the KBox using CW Koheras.

The size of the CW output from the collimator at 1 meter from is ~ 2.4 mm, to be adjusted with lenses to match the cavity !!! (attached image)

For the 2 alignment mirrors, I am only able to control 3 axes for now (motor issue for the fourth to be fixed !!) , Horizontal and vertical for Ma1 and Horizontal for Ma2(closes to injection window).

Started with only irises placed on both the M1 and M2. Placed a beam profiler at the window behind M2 to observe an output beam.

Motors position for the 3 axes and beam shape and position after M2 attached.

 

 

 

 

 

Attachment 1: all_mirrorsplaced_after_m2_window.jpg
all_mirrorsplaced_after_m2_window.jpg
Attachment 2: 20222704_SBox_alignment.pptx
  83   Mon May 9 18:36:48 2022 Manar AmerFixedreportlasers and opticsOptical roomSBox Alignment

Last week In FP cavity we had all SBox mirrors including the damaged M1 mirror.

The beating was observed with just a slight adjustment on M4 alignment.

In addition, it was also observed while driving the piezo of the CW laser.

In the attached image of the beam at transmission point at M2 mirror, the shape of the beam is deformed.

one of the factors could be related to the damaged spot on M1 mirror. The deformation position can also be seen in the higher order modes.

after changing the injection mirror to Gamma factory M1, this deformation should disappear.

Manar Amer wrote:

Finished the alignment of the SBox with M1 of SBox placed, to be changed to gamma factory mirror later

Observed what seems to be transmission through M2 mirror, to be confirmed. image attached shows it

a PowerPoint attached showing the details of today's work.

 

 

Manar Amer wrote:
  • Adjust the placement of the Irises  (done at the start of the day, adjusted at the end when M1 mirror was placed)
  • Improvement on the Ma1 and Ma2 (The Alignment Mirrors)
    • Improves the alignment a bit. There is an observation where there is no symmetry in the image, concluded to be because of the pinholes that are usually used for the alignment the circle cut is not symmetric (took images on phone of pinholes)
    • This explains why, for the pinhole used on M1, we see a little more symmetry than the pinhole used on M2. 
    •  
    • Placed M1 mirror from Sbox (with damage spot in the middle), after cleaning it using the spincoater, only used to adjust the injection into the mirror where it will give Horizontal displacement due to the thickness of the mirror.
    • Last position of the motors attached
  • Installed the 2 dielectric mirrors for the reflection line
  • Did a rough alignment for the reflection line to have it exit through the reflection window.

Note about mirrors : They were cleaned a year a go and placed in the boxes. When opened the box and seen under microscope they were very dirty with dust particle 

Specially from the back, I believe the boxes have dust in them (to be verified under the UV light /  Microscope  !!!!!!!! )

 

Manar Amer wrote:

Remember to update the position of the reference Irises tomorrow !!!!

Manar Amer wrote:

After pointers and Advice from Aurélien,

improvement of the beam alignment through M1 and M2 irises was done.

To improve the image on the beam profiler, I cleaned the alignment mirrors and the windows using pure ethanol and optical lens cleaning tissue,

a significant improvement after cleaning the inside of M2 Window. Images have less dust diffraction rings.

Attached new images of the beam:

  • New Ma1 and Ma2 motor position
  • After M1 pinhole optimized (saturated)
  • After M2 and M1 pinhole optimizing (saturated and not)
Manar Amer wrote:

SBox alignment, using CW laser Koheras power 1 mW

  • Finished M1 and M2 alignment using the diffraction patterns seen on the beam profiler,  the beam fit is not very good ?? (image taken)
  • Positions of Ma1 and Ma2 motors are registered (image taken)
  • Placed Fixed 2 irises at M1 window and M2 window (Image taken while both are closed)
  • Distance between the collimator and beam profiler ~ 2 m
  • Distance between collimator and M1 diaphragm   ~ 1 m
  • Distance between collimator and M2 diaphragm ~ 1.6 m 

 

Manar Amer wrote:

Starting with the alignment of the KBox using CW Koheras.

The size of the CW output from the collimator at 1 meter from is ~ 2.4 mm, to be adjusted with lenses to match the cavity !!! (attached image)

For the 2 alignment mirrors, I am only able to control 3 axes for now (motor issue for the fourth to be fixed !!) , Horizontal and vertical for Ma1 and Horizontal for Ma2(closes to injection window).

Started with only irises placed on both the M1 and M2. Placed a beam profiler at the window behind M2 to observe an output beam.

Motors position for the 3 axes and beam shape and position after M2 attached.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Attachment 1: Beating_TM00_SBox_damaged_M1.jpg
Beating_TM00_SBox_damaged_M1.jpg
Attachment 2: Beating_HigherOrder_SBox_damaged_M1.jpg
Beating_HigherOrder_SBox_damaged_M1.jpg
  84   Mon May 9 19:05:35 2022 Manar AmerFixedreportlasers and opticsOptical roomSBox Alignment

Today; replaced the M1 SBox mirror with M1 from gamma factory , following the previous alignment.

Removed all mirrors and cleaned them one by one.

Started with no M1, placed M2 did its alignment through M3 pinhole, then placed M3 aligned it through M4 pinhole, then placed M4 aligned it through M1 pinhole.

Placed M1 Gamma factory at the end

Note: mirror is new was not used before, took image on microscope there was no dust in the center, but there was little on the edges (cleaned it using spin-coater)

beating of fundamental mode observed (at M2 transmission) immediately with very higher order modes, slight adjustment on M4 suppressed them.

The beam is not circular and still has some deformation, M1 was changed, so it could be a damaged point at one of the other mirrors (to be investigated tomorrow)!!

No significant damage seen on the other mirrors.

 

 

Manar Amer wrote:

Last week In FP cavity we had all SBox mirrors including the damaged M1 mirror.

The beating was observed with just a slight adjustment on M4 alignment.

In addition, it was also observed while driving the piezo of the CW laser.

In the attached image of the beam at transmission point at M2 mirror, the shape of the beam is deformed.

one of the factors could be related to the damaged spot on M1 mirror. The deformation position can also be seen in the higher order modes.

after changing the injection mirror to Gamma factory M1, this deformation should disappear.

Manar Amer wrote:

Finished the alignment of the SBox with M1 of SBox placed, to be changed to gamma factory mirror later

Observed what seems to be transmission through M2 mirror, to be confirmed. image attached shows it

a PowerPoint attached showing the details of today's work.

 

 

Manar Amer wrote:
  • Adjust the placement of the Irises  (done at the start of the day, adjusted at the end when M1 mirror was placed)
  • Improvement on the Ma1 and Ma2 (The Alignment Mirrors)
    • Improves the alignment a bit. There is an observation where there is no symmetry in the image, concluded to be because of the pinholes that are usually used for the alignment the circle cut is not symmetric (took images on phone of pinholes)
    • This explains why, for the pinhole used on M1, we see a little more symmetry than the pinhole used on M2. 
    •  
    • Placed M1 mirror from Sbox (with damage spot in the middle), after cleaning it using the spincoater, only used to adjust the injection into the mirror where it will give Horizontal displacement due to the thickness of the mirror.
    • Last position of the motors attached
  • Installed the 2 dielectric mirrors for the reflection line
  • Did a rough alignment for the reflection line to have it exit through the reflection window.

Note about mirrors : They were cleaned a year a go and placed in the boxes. When opened the box and seen under microscope they were very dirty with dust particle 

Specially from the back, I believe the boxes have dust in them (to be verified under the UV light /  Microscope  !!!!!!!! )

 

Manar Amer wrote:

Remember to update the position of the reference Irises tomorrow !!!!

Manar Amer wrote:

After pointers and Advice from Aurélien,

improvement of the beam alignment through M1 and M2 irises was done.

To improve the image on the beam profiler, I cleaned the alignment mirrors and the windows using pure ethanol and optical lens cleaning tissue,

a significant improvement after cleaning the inside of M2 Window. Images have less dust diffraction rings.

Attached new images of the beam:

  • New Ma1 and Ma2 motor position
  • After M1 pinhole optimized (saturated)
  • After M2 and M1 pinhole optimizing (saturated and not)
Manar Amer wrote:

SBox alignment, using CW laser Koheras power 1 mW

  • Finished M1 and M2 alignment using the diffraction patterns seen on the beam profiler,  the beam fit is not very good ?? (image taken)
  • Positions of Ma1 and Ma2 motors are registered (image taken)
  • Placed Fixed 2 irises at M1 window and M2 window (Image taken while both are closed)
  • Distance between the collimator and beam profiler ~ 2 m
  • Distance between collimator and M1 diaphragm   ~ 1 m
  • Distance between collimator and M2 diaphragm ~ 1.6 m 

 

Manar Amer wrote:

Starting with the alignment of the KBox using CW Koheras.

The size of the CW output from the collimator at 1 meter from is ~ 2.4 mm, to be adjusted with lenses to match the cavity !!! (attached image)

For the 2 alignment mirrors, I am only able to control 3 axes for now (motor issue for the fourth to be fixed !!) , Horizontal and vertical for Ma1 and Horizontal for Ma2(closes to injection window).

Started with only irises placed on both the M1 and M2. Placed a beam profiler at the window behind M2 to observe an output beam.

Motors position for the 3 axes and beam shape and position after M2 attached.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Attachment 1: M2_alignment_M3_pinhole.jpg
M2_alignment_M3_pinhole.jpg
Attachment 2: M3_alignment_M4_pinhole.jpg
M3_alignment_M4_pinhole.jpg
Attachment 3: M4_alignment_M1_pinhole.jpg
M4_alignment_M1_pinhole.jpg
Attachment 4: Beating_TM00_CW_piezo_drive.jpg
Beating_TM00_CW_piezo_drive.jpg
  86   Wed May 11 09:19:48 2022 Manar AmerFixedreportlasers and opticsOptical roomSBox Alignment

Yesterday, to find the source of why the mode is deformed, I tried to rotate the mirrors to see if there is a change.

I started with M2 and rotated it by ~ 90 degrees, there is a change in the shape of the beam.(image attached)

Will see if changing M2 to the spare M2 from SBox can fix the issue.

At the end of the day, alignment was lost.

will be redone today while changing M2 mirror.

Manar Amer wrote:

Today; replaced the M1 SBox mirror with M1 from gamma factory , following the previous alignment.

Removed all mirrors and cleaned them one by one.

Started with no M1, placed M2 did its alignment through M3 pinhole, then placed M3 aligned it through M4 pinhole, then placed M4 aligned it through M1 pinhole.

Placed M1 Gamma factory at the end

Note: mirror is new was not used before, took image on microscope there was no dust in the center, but there was little on the edges (cleaned it using spin-coater)

beating of fundamental mode observed (at M2 transmission) immediately with very higher order modes, slight adjustment on M4 suppressed them.

The beam is not circular and still has some deformation, M1 was changed, so it could be a damaged point at one of the other mirrors (to be investigated tomorrow)!!

No significant damage seen on the other mirrors.

 

 

Manar Amer wrote:

Last week In FP cavity we had all SBox mirrors including the damaged M1 mirror.

The beating was observed with just a slight adjustment on M4 alignment.

In addition, it was also observed while driving the piezo of the CW laser.

In the attached image of the beam at transmission point at M2 mirror, the shape of the beam is deformed.

one of the factors could be related to the damaged spot on M1 mirror. The deformation position can also be seen in the higher order modes.

after changing the injection mirror to Gamma factory M1, this deformation should disappear.

Manar Amer wrote:

Finished the alignment of the SBox with M1 of SBox placed, to be changed to gamma factory mirror later

Observed what seems to be transmission through M2 mirror, to be confirmed. image attached shows it

a PowerPoint attached showing the details of today's work.

 

 

Manar Amer wrote:
  • Adjust the placement of the Irises  (done at the start of the day, adjusted at the end when M1 mirror was placed)
  • Improvement on the Ma1 and Ma2 (The Alignment Mirrors)
    • Improves the alignment a bit. There is an observation where there is no symmetry in the image, concluded to be because of the pinholes that are usually used for the alignment the circle cut is not symmetric (took images on phone of pinholes)
    • This explains why, for the pinhole used on M1, we see a little more symmetry than the pinhole used on M2. 
    •  
    • Placed M1 mirror from Sbox (with damage spot in the middle), after cleaning it using the spincoater, only used to adjust the injection into the mirror where it will give Horizontal displacement due to the thickness of the mirror.
    • Last position of the motors attached
  • Installed the 2 dielectric mirrors for the reflection line
  • Did a rough alignment for the reflection line to have it exit through the reflection window.

Note about mirrors : They were cleaned a year a go and placed in the boxes. When opened the box and seen under microscope they were very dirty with dust particle 

Specially from the back, I believe the boxes have dust in them (to be verified under the UV light /  Microscope  !!!!!!!! )

 

Manar Amer wrote:

Remember to update the position of the reference Irises tomorrow !!!!

Manar Amer wrote:

After pointers and Advice from Aurélien,

improvement of the beam alignment through M1 and M2 irises was done.

To improve the image on the beam profiler, I cleaned the alignment mirrors and the windows using pure ethanol and optical lens cleaning tissue,

a significant improvement after cleaning the inside of M2 Window. Images have less dust diffraction rings.

Attached new images of the beam:

  • New Ma1 and Ma2 motor position
  • After M1 pinhole optimized (saturated)
  • After M2 and M1 pinhole optimizing (saturated and not)
Manar Amer wrote:

SBox alignment, using CW laser Koheras power 1 mW

  • Finished M1 and M2 alignment using the diffraction patterns seen on the beam profiler,  the beam fit is not very good ?? (image taken)
  • Positions of Ma1 and Ma2 motors are registered (image taken)
  • Placed Fixed 2 irises at M1 window and M2 window (Image taken while both are closed)
  • Distance between the collimator and beam profiler ~ 2 m
  • Distance between collimator and M1 diaphragm   ~ 1 m
  • Distance between collimator and M2 diaphragm ~ 1.6 m 

 

Manar Amer wrote:

Starting with the alignment of the KBox using CW Koheras.

The size of the CW output from the collimator at 1 meter from is ~ 2.4 mm, to be adjusted with lenses to match the cavity !!! (attached image)

For the 2 alignment mirrors, I am only able to control 3 axes for now (motor issue for the fourth to be fixed !!) , Horizontal and vertical for Ma1 and Horizontal for Ma2(closes to injection window).

Started with only irises placed on both the M1 and M2. Placed a beam profiler at the window behind M2 to observe an output beam.

Motors position for the 3 axes and beam shape and position after M2 attached.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Attachment 1: Beating00_after_rotatingM2_2.jpg
Beating00_after_rotatingM2_2.jpg
  88   Wed May 11 21:10:27 2022 Manar AmerFixedreportlasers and opticsOptical roomSBox Alignment

M2 Sbox changed to spare. Alignment of M2 was redone. 

With the help of Ronic , We observe fundamental mode of the cavity with higher order modes. A frequency scan on the piezo was done to find the beating frequency , the shape is elliptical with no clear deformation.

The beam seems to be hitting something, which causes a reflection seen on the beam profiler.

We started a slow scan to improvement of the outside alignment.

At the end of the day, I can only get the TM01 and TM10 modes,

alignment to be continued tomorrow + the scan offset

Note: observation on TM01 and TM10 modes, we clearly see that the beam position is different from the mode center position !!

 

Manar Amer wrote:

Yesterday, to find the source of why the mode is deformed, I tried to rotate the mirrors to see if there is a change.

I started with M2 and rotated it by ~ 90 degrees, there is a change in the shape of the beam.(image attached)

Will see if changing M2 to the spare M2 from SBox can fix the issue.

At the end of the day, alignment was lost.

will be redone today while changing M2 mirror.

Manar Amer wrote:

Today; replaced the M1 SBox mirror with M1 from gamma factory , following the previous alignment.

Removed all mirrors and cleaned them one by one.

Started with no M1, placed M2 did its alignment through M3 pinhole, then placed M3 aligned it through M4 pinhole, then placed M4 aligned it through M1 pinhole.

Placed M1 Gamma factory at the end

Note: mirror is new was not used before, took image on microscope there was no dust in the center, but there was little on the edges (cleaned it using spin-coater)

beating of fundamental mode observed (at M2 transmission) immediately with very higher order modes, slight adjustment on M4 suppressed them.

The beam is not circular and still has some deformation, M1 was changed, so it could be a damaged point at one of the other mirrors (to be investigated tomorrow)!!

No significant damage seen on the other mirrors.

 

 

Manar Amer wrote:

Last week In FP cavity we had all SBox mirrors including the damaged M1 mirror.

The beating was observed with just a slight adjustment on M4 alignment.

In addition, it was also observed while driving the piezo of the CW laser.

In the attached image of the beam at transmission point at M2 mirror, the shape of the beam is deformed.

one of the factors could be related to the damaged spot on M1 mirror. The deformation position can also be seen in the higher order modes.

after changing the injection mirror to Gamma factory M1, this deformation should disappear.

Manar Amer wrote:

Finished the alignment of the SBox with M1 of SBox placed, to be changed to gamma factory mirror later

Observed what seems to be transmission through M2 mirror, to be confirmed. image attached shows it

a PowerPoint attached showing the details of today's work.

 

 

Manar Amer wrote:
  • Adjust the placement of the Irises  (done at the start of the day, adjusted at the end when M1 mirror was placed)
  • Improvement on the Ma1 and Ma2 (The Alignment Mirrors)
    • Improves the alignment a bit. There is an observation where there is no symmetry in the image, concluded to be because of the pinholes that are usually used for the alignment the circle cut is not symmetric (took images on phone of pinholes)
    • This explains why, for the pinhole used on M1, we see a little more symmetry than the pinhole used on M2. 
    •  
    • Placed M1 mirror from Sbox (with damage spot in the middle), after cleaning it using the spincoater, only used to adjust the injection into the mirror where it will give Horizontal displacement due to the thickness of the mirror.
    • Last position of the motors attached
  • Installed the 2 dielectric mirrors for the reflection line
  • Did a rough alignment for the reflection line to have it exit through the reflection window.

Note about mirrors : They were cleaned a year a go and placed in the boxes. When opened the box and seen under microscope they were very dirty with dust particle 

Specially from the back, I believe the boxes have dust in them (to be verified under the UV light /  Microscope  !!!!!!!! )

 

Manar Amer wrote:

Remember to update the position of the reference Irises tomorrow !!!!

Manar Amer wrote:

After pointers and Advice from Aurélien,

improvement of the beam alignment through M1 and M2 irises was done.

To improve the image on the beam profiler, I cleaned the alignment mirrors and the windows using pure ethanol and optical lens cleaning tissue,

a significant improvement after cleaning the inside of M2 Window. Images have less dust diffraction rings.

Attached new images of the beam:

  • New Ma1 and Ma2 motor position
  • After M1 pinhole optimized (saturated)
  • After M2 and M1 pinhole optimizing (saturated and not)
Manar Amer wrote:

SBox alignment, using CW laser Koheras power 1 mW

  • Finished M1 and M2 alignment using the diffraction patterns seen on the beam profiler,  the beam fit is not very good ?? (image taken)
  • Positions of Ma1 and Ma2 motors are registered (image taken)
  • Placed Fixed 2 irises at M1 window and M2 window (Image taken while both are closed)
  • Distance between the collimator and beam profiler ~ 2 m
  • Distance between collimator and M1 diaphragm   ~ 1 m
  • Distance between collimator and M2 diaphragm ~ 1.6 m 

 

Manar Amer wrote:

Starting with the alignment of the KBox using CW Koheras.

The size of the CW output from the collimator at 1 meter from is ~ 2.4 mm, to be adjusted with lenses to match the cavity !!! (attached image)

For the 2 alignment mirrors, I am only able to control 3 axes for now (motor issue for the fourth to be fixed !!) , Horizontal and vertical for Ma1 and Horizontal for Ma2(closes to injection window).

Started with only irises placed on both the M1 and M2. Placed a beam profiler at the window behind M2 to observe an output beam.

Motors position for the 3 axes and beam shape and position after M2 attached.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Attachment 1: TM00_mode.jpg
TM00_mode.jpg
Attachment 2: TM01_mode.jpg
TM01_mode.jpg
Attachment 3: TM10_mode.jpg
TM10_mode.jpg
  90   Tue May 24 22:05:48 2022 Manar AmerFixedreportlasers and opticsOptical roomSBox Alignment

The external and internal alignment was redone.

External Alignment : the collimator position moved so in order to have a good start I placed 2 metallic mirrors and did a rough retrace of it's line through the cavity box.

It helped as I did not have to do a lot of adjustment on Ma1 and Ma2 position (new position attached)

 

Internal Alignment: I replaced the 2 pinholes inside the cavity box with another set where the holes are more symmetric, it shows in the alignment.

Images attached of the beam diffraction pattern after each mirror pinhole.

The injection mirror was placed at the end of the alignment.

Alignment Done !!!!!!!!!!!!!

 

Manar Amer wrote:

M2 Sbox changed to spare. Alignment of M2 was redone. 

With the help of Ronic , We observe fundamental mode of the cavity with higher order modes. A frequency scan on the piezo was done to find the beating frequency , the shape is elliptical with no clear deformation.

The beam seems to be hitting something, which causes a reflection seen on the beam profiler.

We started a slow scan to improvement of the outside alignment.

At the end of the day, I can only get the TM01 and TM10 modes,

alignment to be continued tomorrow + the scan offset

Note: observation on TM01 and TM10 modes, we clearly see that the beam position is different from the mode center position !!

 

Manar Amer wrote:

Yesterday, to find the source of why the mode is deformed, I tried to rotate the mirrors to see if there is a change.

I started with M2 and rotated it by ~ 90 degrees, there is a change in the shape of the beam.(image attached)

Will see if changing M2 to the spare M2 from SBox can fix the issue.

At the end of the day, alignment was lost.

will be redone today while changing M2 mirror.

Manar Amer wrote:

Today; replaced the M1 SBox mirror with M1 from gamma factory , following the previous alignment.

Removed all mirrors and cleaned them one by one.

Started with no M1, placed M2 did its alignment through M3 pinhole, then placed M3 aligned it through M4 pinhole, then placed M4 aligned it through M1 pinhole.

Placed M1 Gamma factory at the end

Note: mirror is new was not used before, took image on microscope there was no dust in the center, but there was little on the edges (cleaned it using spin-coater)

beating of fundamental mode observed (at M2 transmission) immediately with very higher order modes, slight adjustment on M4 suppressed them.

The beam is not circular and still has some deformation, M1 was changed, so it could be a damaged point at one of the other mirrors (to be investigated tomorrow)!!

No significant damage seen on the other mirrors.

 

 

Manar Amer wrote:

Last week In FP cavity we had all SBox mirrors including the damaged M1 mirror.

The beating was observed with just a slight adjustment on M4 alignment.

In addition, it was also observed while driving the piezo of the CW laser.

In the attached image of the beam at transmission point at M2 mirror, the shape of the beam is deformed.

one of the factors could be related to the damaged spot on M1 mirror. The deformation position can also be seen in the higher order modes.

after changing the injection mirror to Gamma factory M1, this deformation should disappear.

Manar Amer wrote:

Finished the alignment of the SBox with M1 of SBox placed, to be changed to gamma factory mirror later

Observed what seems to be transmission through M2 mirror, to be confirmed. image attached shows it

a PowerPoint attached showing the details of today's work.

 

 

Manar Amer wrote:
  • Adjust the placement of the Irises  (done at the start of the day, adjusted at the end when M1 mirror was placed)
  • Improvement on the Ma1 and Ma2 (The Alignment Mirrors)
    • Improves the alignment a bit. There is an observation where there is no symmetry in the image, concluded to be because of the pinholes that are usually used for the alignment the circle cut is not symmetric (took images on phone of pinholes)
    • This explains why, for the pinhole used on M1, we see a little more symmetry than the pinhole used on M2. 
    •  
    • Placed M1 mirror from Sbox (with damage spot in the middle), after cleaning it using the spincoater, only used to adjust the injection into the mirror where it will give Horizontal displacement due to the thickness of the mirror.
    • Last position of the motors attached
  • Installed the 2 dielectric mirrors for the reflection line
  • Did a rough alignment for the reflection line to have it exit through the reflection window.

Note about mirrors : They were cleaned a year a go and placed in the boxes. When opened the box and seen under microscope they were very dirty with dust particle 

Specially from the back, I believe the boxes have dust in them (to be verified under the UV light /  Microscope  !!!!!!!! )

 

Manar Amer wrote:

Remember to update the position of the reference Irises tomorrow !!!!

Manar Amer wrote:

After pointers and Advice from Aurélien,

improvement of the beam alignment through M1 and M2 irises was done.

To improve the image on the beam profiler, I cleaned the alignment mirrors and the windows using pure ethanol and optical lens cleaning tissue,

a significant improvement after cleaning the inside of M2 Window. Images have less dust diffraction rings.

Attached new images of the beam:

  • New Ma1 and Ma2 motor position
  • After M1 pinhole optimized (saturated)
  • After M2 and M1 pinhole optimizing (saturated and not)
Manar Amer wrote:

SBox alignment, using CW laser Koheras power 1 mW

  • Finished M1 and M2 alignment using the diffraction patterns seen on the beam profiler,  the beam fit is not very good ?? (image taken)
  • Positions of Ma1 and Ma2 motors are registered (image taken)
  • Placed Fixed 2 irises at M1 window and M2 window (Image taken while both are closed)
  • Distance between the collimator and beam profiler ~ 2 m
  • Distance between collimator and M1 diaphragm   ~ 1 m
  • Distance between collimator and M2 diaphragm ~ 1.6 m 

 

Manar Amer wrote:

Starting with the alignment of the KBox using CW Koheras.

The size of the CW output from the collimator at 1 meter from is ~ 2.4 mm, to be adjusted with lenses to match the cavity !!! (attached image)

For the 2 alignment mirrors, I am only able to control 3 axes for now (motor issue for the fourth to be fixed !!) , Horizontal and vertical for Ma1 and Horizontal for Ma2(closes to injection window).

Started with only irises placed on both the M1 and M2. Placed a beam profiler at the window behind M2 to observe an output beam.

Motors position for the 3 axes and beam shape and position after M2 attached.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Attachment 1: Ma1Ma2Horizontal.jpg
Ma1Ma2Horizontal.jpg
Attachment 2: Ma1Ma2Vertical.jpg
Ma1Ma2Vertical.jpg
Attachment 3: M1_pinhole.bmp
Attachment 4: M2_pinhole.bmp
Attachment 5: M1_M2_pinhole.bmp
Attachment 6: M3_pinhole.bmp
Attachment 7: M4_pinhole.bmp
  91   Tue May 24 22:11:40 2022 Manar AmerFixedreportlasers and opticsOptical roomFundamental Mode TEM00

The current setup for the SBox has a beam viewer and 2 photodiodes placed at reflection and transmission.

The CW laser piezoelectric crystal was driven using the lase lock system to observe the 00 mode.

Mode Observed and has no reflection (from what was previously seen)

higher order modes are resonating with 00 mode , example 11 mode (shown in image attached)

the coupling is yet to be seen and measured.

Attachment 1: 20220524_SBox_Setup.png
20220524_SBox_Setup.png
Attachment 2: 00mode_CW_piezo_drive.bmp
Attachment 3: 00mode_11mode.bmp
  92   Wed May 25 17:34:29 2022 Manar AmerFixedreportlasers and opticsOptical roomFundamental Mode TEM00

Adding images from the transmission after the spherical mirrors M3 and M4 window for a resonating mode inside the cavity.

There appears to be some misalignment from the center of the mirror ???

 

Manar Amer wrote:

The current setup for the SBox has a beam viewer and 2 photodiodes placed at reflection and transmission.

The CW laser piezoelectric crystal was driven using the lase lock system to observe the 00 mode.

Mode Observed and has no reflection (from what was previously seen)

higher order modes are resonating with 00 mode , example 11 mode (shown in image attached)

the coupling is yet to be seen and measured.

 

Attachment 1: beamviwer_transmission_at_M3.bmp
Attachment 2: beamviwer_transmission_at_M4.bmp
  93   Wed Jun 8 10:47:45 2022 Manar AmerFixedreportlasers and opticsOptical roomSBox Alignment

Closing Series for Alignment.

Beating observed, beam is in the locking stages

 

Manar Amer wrote:

The external and internal alignment was redone.

External Alignment : the collimator position moved so in order to have a good start I placed 2 metallic mirrors and did a rough retrace of it's line through the cavity box.

It helped as I did not have to do a lot of adjustment on Ma1 and Ma2 position (new position attached)

 

Internal Alignment: I replaced the 2 pinholes inside the cavity box with another set where the holes are more symmetric, it shows in the alignment.

Images attached of the beam diffraction pattern after each mirror pinhole.

The injection mirror was placed at the end of the alignment.

Alignment Done !!!!!!!!!!!!!

 

Manar Amer wrote:

M2 Sbox changed to spare. Alignment of M2 was redone. 

With the help of Ronic , We observe fundamental mode of the cavity with higher order modes. A frequency scan on the piezo was done to find the beating frequency , the shape is elliptical with no clear deformation.

The beam seems to be hitting something, which causes a reflection seen on the beam profiler.

We started a slow scan to improvement of the outside alignment.

At the end of the day, I can only get the TM01 and TM10 modes,

alignment to be continued tomorrow + the scan offset

Note: observation on TM01 and TM10 modes, we clearly see that the beam position is different from the mode center position !!

 

Manar Amer wrote:

Yesterday, to find the source of why the mode is deformed, I tried to rotate the mirrors to see if there is a change.

I started with M2 and rotated it by ~ 90 degrees, there is a change in the shape of the beam.(image attached)

Will see if changing M2 to the spare M2 from SBox can fix the issue.

At the end of the day, alignment was lost.

will be redone today while changing M2 mirror.

Manar Amer wrote:

Today; replaced the M1 SBox mirror with M1 from gamma factory , following the previous alignment.

Removed all mirrors and cleaned them one by one.

Started with no M1, placed M2 did its alignment through M3 pinhole, then placed M3 aligned it through M4 pinhole, then placed M4 aligned it through M1 pinhole.

Placed M1 Gamma factory at the end

Note: mirror is new was not used before, took image on microscope there was no dust in the center, but there was little on the edges (cleaned it using spin-coater)

beating of fundamental mode observed (at M2 transmission) immediately with very higher order modes, slight adjustment on M4 suppressed them.

The beam is not circular and still has some deformation, M1 was changed, so it could be a damaged point at one of the other mirrors (to be investigated tomorrow)!!

No significant damage seen on the other mirrors.

 

 

Manar Amer wrote:

Last week In FP cavity we had all SBox mirrors including the damaged M1 mirror.

The beating was observed with just a slight adjustment on M4 alignment.

In addition, it was also observed while driving the piezo of the CW laser.

In the attached image of the beam at transmission point at M2 mirror, the shape of the beam is deformed.

one of the factors could be related to the damaged spot on M1 mirror. The deformation position can also be seen in the higher order modes.

after changing the injection mirror to Gamma factory M1, this deformation should disappear.

Manar Amer wrote:

Finished the alignment of the SBox with M1 of SBox placed, to be changed to gamma factory mirror later

Observed what seems to be transmission through M2 mirror, to be confirmed. image attached shows it

a PowerPoint attached showing the details of today's work.

 

 

Manar Amer wrote:
  • Adjust the placement of the Irises  (done at the start of the day, adjusted at the end when M1 mirror was placed)
  • Improvement on the Ma1 and Ma2 (The Alignment Mirrors)
    • Improves the alignment a bit. There is an observation where there is no symmetry in the image, concluded to be because of the pinholes that are usually used for the alignment the circle cut is not symmetric (took images on phone of pinholes)
    • This explains why, for the pinhole used on M1, we see a little more symmetry than the pinhole used on M2. 
    •  
    • Placed M1 mirror from Sbox (with damage spot in the middle), after cleaning it using the spincoater, only used to adjust the injection into the mirror where it will give Horizontal displacement due to the thickness of the mirror.
    • Last position of the motors attached
  • Installed the 2 dielectric mirrors for the reflection line
  • Did a rough alignment for the reflection line to have it exit through the reflection window.

Note about mirrors : They were cleaned a year a go and placed in the boxes. When opened the box and seen under microscope they were very dirty with dust particle 

Specially from the back, I believe the boxes have dust in them (to be verified under the UV light /  Microscope  !!!!!!!! )

 

Manar Amer wrote:

Remember to update the position of the reference Irises tomorrow !!!!

Manar Amer wrote:

After pointers and Advice from Aurélien,

improvement of the beam alignment through M1 and M2 irises was done.

To improve the image on the beam profiler, I cleaned the alignment mirrors and the windows using pure ethanol and optical lens cleaning tissue,

a significant improvement after cleaning the inside of M2 Window. Images have less dust diffraction rings.

Attached new images of the beam:

  • New Ma1 and Ma2 motor position
  • After M1 pinhole optimized (saturated)
  • After M2 and M1 pinhole optimizing (saturated and not)
Manar Amer wrote:

SBox alignment, using CW laser Koheras power 1 mW

  • Finished M1 and M2 alignment using the diffraction patterns seen on the beam profiler,  the beam fit is not very good ?? (image taken)
  • Positions of Ma1 and Ma2 motors are registered (image taken)
  • Placed Fixed 2 irises at M1 window and M2 window (Image taken while both are closed)
  • Distance between the collimator and beam profiler ~ 2 m
  • Distance between collimator and M1 diaphragm   ~ 1 m
  • Distance between collimator and M2 diaphragm ~ 1.6 m 

 

Manar Amer wrote:

Starting with the alignment of the KBox using CW Koheras.

The size of the CW output from the collimator at 1 meter from is ~ 2.4 mm, to be adjusted with lenses to match the cavity !!! (attached image)

For the 2 alignment mirrors, I am only able to control 3 axes for now (motor issue for the fourth to be fixed !!) , Horizontal and vertical for Ma1 and Horizontal for Ma2(closes to injection window).

Started with only irises placed on both the M1 and M2. Placed a beam profiler at the window behind M2 to observe an output beam.

Motors position for the 3 axes and beam shape and position after M2 attached.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  94   Wed Jun 8 10:58:15 2022 Manar AmerFixedreportlasers and opticsOptical roomFundamental Mode TEM00

Images of the Transmitted beam at M2 mirror at different days. 

The first one was from last week, the second from yesterday.

There is misalignment (drift due to temperature) from the position where the beam was initially. ( reference taken between centers of mode and direct injected beam) 

it is most clear in the vertical position.

Manar Amer wrote:

Adding images from the transmission after the spherical mirrors M3 and M4 window for a resonating mode inside the cavity.

There appears to be some misalignment from the center of the mirror ???

 

Manar Amer wrote:

The current setup for the SBox has a beam viewer and 2 photodiodes placed at reflection and transmission.

The CW laser piezoelectric crystal was driven using the lase lock system to observe the 00 mode.

Mode Observed and has no reflection (from what was previously seen)

higher order modes are resonating with 00 mode , example 11 mode (shown in image attached)

the coupling is yet to be seen and measured.

 

 

Attachment 1: 20220530_00_Mode.bmp
Attachment 2: 00_Mode_Beam_Transmitted_Position_drift_due_to_temperature.bmp
  96   Wed Jun 8 11:24:35 2022 Manar AmerFixedreportlasers and opticsOptical roomTelescope - Spacial Matching

Divergence of the CW beam out of the collimator measured after 1 meter to be 

  • 2 \Thetax = 0.7425  mrad  --> \Thetax = 0.37125  mrad
  • 2 \Thetay = 0.7115  mrad  --> \Thetay = 0.3575    mrad

two lenses were placed to decrease the diameter of the injected beam

Attachment 1: SBox_Spacial_Matching_Telescope.png
SBox_Spacial_Matching_Telescope.png
  102   Wed Jul 6 18:35:38 2022 Manar AmerFixedreportlasers and opticsOptical roomFundamental Mode TEM00

Closing series of 00 mode for FSR @ 133.33 MHz

 

Manar Amer wrote:

Images of the Transmitted beam at M2 mirror at different days. 

The first one was from last week, the second from yesterday.

There is misalignment (drift due to temperature) from the position where the beam was initially. ( reference taken between centers of mode and direct injected beam) 

it is most clear in the vertical position.

Manar Amer wrote:

Adding images from the transmission after the spherical mirrors M3 and M4 window for a resonating mode inside the cavity.

There appears to be some misalignment from the center of the mirror ???

 

Manar Amer wrote:

The current setup for the SBox has a beam viewer and 2 photodiodes placed at reflection and transmission.

The CW laser piezoelectric crystal was driven using the lase lock system to observe the 00 mode.

Mode Observed and has no reflection (from what was previously seen)

higher order modes are resonating with 00 mode , example 11 mode (shown in image attached)

the coupling is yet to be seen and measured.

 

 

 

ELOG V3.1.4-395e101