HOME SBOX THOMX MINICAV Utilities
SBOX orders SBOX installation SBOX commissioning SBOX control command
  Status of commissioning, report also here plots are reports., Page 5 of 13  Not logged in ELOG logo
ID Date Author Statusdown Type Category Location Title
  57   Thu Feb 6 16:58:57 2020 Loïc AmoudryFixedreportlasers and opticsOptical roomPower up to 48kW crater effect again

As we said, after glow discharge and spin coater we recovered a low power finesse ~23000 (aligning away from the M1 crater).

Today, we have made some power up to 48kW (3A on 3rd stage). At this power, there was no important effect on the transmission which can be compared with the coupling (see image "3A_136mWtrans"). We waited ~20min without aligning and the power dropped slowly (misalignment) to 39kW. 

Then we increased the amplifier power to 4A and the power went up to 44kW. At this moment, the strange transmission behavior that we observed before mirror crater, appeared again (see image "4A_126mWtrans"). We also observed a mode deformation with the camera, see image "mode_strange". This shape was not depend of the camera/filter rotation angle and still appear with another camera.

Loïc Amoudry wrote:

The mirrors went in the cavity the 28th of november (We did several power up to 30kW stored and only one to 40kW then the power went down to 2kW during the run).

Microscope study shows that mirrors get some dust during the handling [travel from microscope to SBOX --> installation --> in SBOX for +1month and power up --> travel to microscope].

Almost all of these dusts can be removed with cleaning.

There is only one important difference between 28th of november and today, a large spot on M1

 

Attachment 1: 3A_136mWtrans.png
3A_136mWtrans.png
Attachment 2: 4A_126mWtrans.png
4A_126mWtrans.png
Attachment 3: mode_strange.png
mode_strange.png
  60   Wed Dec 16 12:36:37 2020 Loïc AmoudryFixedreportlasers and opticsOptical roomMirror's cleaning and microscope imaging

On 10th of december 2020 we cleaned the SBOX mirrors and took microscope images (the name of the images indicates what they are).

There are 7 mirror, the initial M1 (spot in the center), M2 (spot on the edge), M3 and M4 which made the 200-400kW and the M2, M3 and M4 SPARE. The difference we make between M3 and M4 SPARE is the number on the box (11 or 13).

We used 3 different cleaning methods : 1st, one spin coater on HR, 2nd one, tissu wipe on AR (wipe with the optical tissu and isoprop) or 3rd one, mirror wiped on tissue (put isoprop on tissu and press AR face of the mirror doing "8" shape 3 times).

The second method is far les efficient as a cleaning method. The image "M3_M4_spare_11_after_cleaning_back.tif " shows the traces let by it and removed by the 3rd method on image "M3_M4_spare_11_after_cleaning_back_second_time_on_tissu.tif".

We can also notice that the spin coater let some trace on the HR face, round shaped, see Image "M3_M4_spare_13_after_cleaning_back.tif". We can propose to use the third method with Acetone on HR face before using spin coater to remove oil or organic particles.

It also lets a trace on the AR face, this is why we clean the AR face with the 2nd method after cleaning it with the spin coater.

 

Note : The position of the mirrors in the microscope is always the same here. Meaning mirrors are directed so that the arrow (which shows the HR face and is placed on the side of the mirror) is placed on the top of the images.

Attachment 1: M1_before_cleaning.tif
Attachment 2: M1_after_cleaning.tif
Attachment 3: M2_after_cleaning.tif
Attachment 4: M3_after_cleaning.tif
Attachment 5: M4_after_cleaning.tif
Attachment 6: M2_spare_before_cleaning.tif
Attachment 7: M2_spare_after_cleaning.tif
Attachment 8: M2_spare_after_cleaning_back.tif
Attachment 9: M3_M4_spare_11_before_cleaning.tif
Attachment 10: M3_M4_spare_11_after_cleaning_back.tif
Attachment 11: M3_M4_spare_11_after_cleaning_back_second_time_on_tissu.tif
Attachment 12: M3_M4_spare_13_before_cleaning.tif
Attachment 13: M3_M4_spare_13_after_cleaning.tif
Attachment 14: M3_M4_spare_13_after_cleaning_back.tif
  61   Tue Jan 5 12:38:04 2021 Manar AmerFixedreportlasers and opticsOptical roomTransmission Measurements for the Mirrors.
  • Thursday 10 December 2020:   First Test Measurement - Inside Box
    •  The transmission ( T ) for the mirrors of SBOX and ThomX was measured over a range from the center of the mirror up to 5mm.
    •  
    • The first setup was initially done while the mirrorr is installed inside the metal box, when measuring T we observe that there is an erregular  change in the power measured as we move azay from the center of the mirror, this was due to reflection of light inside the box. The reflection from the mirror was reflected on the metal inside the box and it was measured by the power meter.

               (so for this setup we only took measrements for T along the center of the mirror)

The file stating the measurements is : Test Cavity _ Mirrors transmission _ Inside box

=======================================================================

  • Tuesday 15 December 2020 :  Second Test - Outside Box
    • The setup for T test was moved outside the metal box with the same distances between the injection beam and mirror ~ 50 cm. and the distance between the injection laser and the mirror next to it ~ 9 cm.
    •  
    • Observation for T is done at full angle and at half angle of reflection ( the mirror was tilted to achive this )
    •  
    • we observed that after each change in the distance from the center the power meter needed to be aligned to have the max power.
    • after doing all the measurements for the range from the center we made it again for the center only and the consistance of the transmission was good.

The file stating the measurements is : Test Cavity _ Mirrors transmission _ outside box

note: the laser used for the test is the Koheras

details on the pwer used, mirrors, power meter, filters, ....etc are shown in the Excel data sheets

Done By : Loic , Manar and Ahmed

Attachment 1: Test_Cavity___Mirrors_transmission___Inside_box.xlsx
Attachment 2: Test_Cavity___Mirrors_transmission___outside_box.xlsx
Attachment 3: set_up_for_transmission_measurement_outside_box.jpeg
set_up_for_transmission_measurement_outside_box.jpeg
Attachment 4: setup_fot_T_measurement_Injection_laser_and_mirrors_reflected_on_at_angle_and_half_angle.jpeg
setup_fot_T_measurement_Injection_laser_and_mirrors_reflected_on_at_angle_and_half_angle.jpeg
Attachment 5: Mirrors_Tested.jpeg
Mirrors_Tested.jpeg
Attachment 6: set_up_for_mirror_and_power_meter.jpeg
set_up_for_mirror_and_power_meter.jpeg
  62   Tue Jan 12 10:44:57 2021 Ronic ChicheFixedissuelasers and opticsOptical roomOrigami SN2440 133MHz laser power measurment... and failure

we received from NKT the Origami SN2440 133MHz oscillator from repair on 2020/12/17
and we measured the power trend from 2020/12/21 until the whole winter Hollyday, during 14 days and 17h (1 273 334 s).
the power was quite constant, about 58mW (the measurement has been done with the OD2 filter and using a (x20) factor in the software to compensate for it),
except for some peaks at the beginning of the measurement to 60.7mW.
I tried to reproduce these peaks by switching on several lights in the room and the airflow ceil but the effect is neglectable,
thus these peaks seem to really come from the oscillator power.

at the beginning of January, the oscillator suffered a back reflection from the rugged anodized convex surface of the power meter (apparently not from the OD2 filter itself) and the laser stopped immediately to modelock.
the laser power dropped to 0 and the laser controller led started to blink red. NKT has been contacted and they think it could be the laser pump diodes that have been damaged.

for the future, we will have to install a fixed optical isolator from the start, even for short operations.

 

Attachment 1: 133mhzpower.PNG
133mhzpower.PNG
Attachment 2: 133mhz_power_zoom.png
133mhz_power_zoom.png
  63   Thu Jun 10 17:55:15 2021 Ronic ChicheFixedinfolasers and opticsOptical roomOrigami SN2440 133MHz laser tests

Today, we received the Origami SN2440 133MHz oscillator from repair (NKT mentioned a defective wire inside the controller....)

We immediately installed it behind an isolator (Faraday rotator+PBS+halfwave plate).

the output power is around 60mW.
the spectrum is around 1030nm
the repetition rate is around 133.33MHz

Attachment 1: IMG_20210610_161502.jpg
IMG_20210610_161502.jpg
Attachment 2: spectre_133MHz.PNG
spectre_133MHz.PNG
Attachment 3: Screen_0015.png
Screen_0015.png
  64   Mon Jul 5 14:14:01 2021 Manar AmerFixedreportlasers and optics | detectors and electronicsOptical roomOEwaves CW Laser - Phase Noise
  • We started measuring the phase noise on the OEwaves CW laser.
    • Class 3b
    • wavelength 1.5 um
  • The procedure is done using self coupling of the laser
    • splitter 50%-50%\
    • delay line 100 m 
    • all fibers are PM type (polarity maintained)
    • Photodetector is "lab buddy", very fast diode.
    • Note: différance from schematic (we did not use a low pass filter)
Attachment 1: 20210207_OEwaves_laser.jpg
20210207_OEwaves_laser.jpg
Attachment 2: 20210207_Self_coupling_setup.jpg
20210207_Self_coupling_setup.jpg
Attachment 3: Schematic-setup-for-optical-delayed-self-coupling-detection.png
Schematic-setup-for-optical-delayed-self-coupling-detection.png
  65   Mon Jul 5 14:40:57 2021 Manar AmerFixedreportlasers and optics | detectors and electronicsOptical roomOEwaves CW Laser - Phase Noise

a correction on the wavelength of the laser  it is 1030 um 

Manar Amer wrote:
  • We started measuring the phase noise on the OEwaves CW laser.
    • Class 3b
    • wavelength 1.5 um
  • The procedure is done using self coupling of the laser
    • splitter 50%-50%\
    • delay line 100 m 
    • all fibers are PM type (polarity maintained)
    • Photodetector is "lab buddy", very fast diode.
    • Note: différance from schematic (we did not use a low pass filter)

 

  66   Mon Jul 5 14:46:44 2021 Manar AmerFixedreportlasers and optics | detectors and electronicsOptical roomOEwaves CW Laser - Phase Noise

correction on unit 1030 nm

Manar Amer wrote:

a correction on the wavelength of the laser  it is 1030 um 

Manar Amer wrote:
  • We started measuring the phase noise on the OEwaves CW laser.
    • Class 3b
    • wavelength 1.5 um
  • The procedure is done using self coupling of the laser
    • splitter 50%-50%\
    • delay line 100 m 
    • all fibers are PM type (polarity maintained)
    • Photodetector is "lab buddy", very fast diode.
    • Note: différance from schematic (we did not use a low pass filter)

 

 

  67   Wed Mar 23 18:11:22 2022 Manar AmerFixedreportutilitiesOptical roomDust Cleaning of SBox

An Initial cleaning of the KBoX outside was done, All the optics and mechanics placed that were on the table were removed.

Only the old Mitylaser amplifier remains on the table.

Since we will be using the ThomX Celia amplifier, we will remove it and place it in a secure location (to be decided).

Tomorrow a cleaning of the inside of the cavity box is to be done.

Attachment 1: Log_Top_window.jpg
Log_Top_window.jpg
Attachment 2: Log_Reflection_window.jpg
Log_Reflection_window.jpg
Attachment 3: Log_Injection_Side_window.jpg
Log_Injection_Side_window.jpg
Attachment 4: Log_Injection_side_window2.jpg
Log_Injection_side_window2.jpg
  68   Wed Mar 23 18:17:45 2022 Manar AmerFixedreportutilitiesOptical roomDust Cleaning of SBox

The cleaning was done twice with half an hour interval between the two times
reading on the dust meter was taken after each time, and it was zero averaged over a 10-min

Manar Amer wrote:

An Initial cleaning of the KBoX outside was done, All the optics and mechanics placed that were on the table were removed.

Only the old Mitylaser amplifier remains on the table.

Since we will be using the ThomX Celia amplifier, we will remove it and place it in a secure location (to be decided).

Tomorrow a cleaning of the inside of the cavity box is to be done.

 

  69   Tue Mar 29 16:23:00 2022 Manar AmerFixedreportlasers and optics | cablingOptical roomMightylaser Amplifier

Migthylaser amplifier has been moved from the SBox table to the PLIC table.

 

  70   Tue Mar 29 16:27:34 2022 Manar AmerFixedreportutilitiesOptical roomSpincoater - Mirrror cleaning

In preparation for cleaning the mirrors.

The spincoater has been moved with its bump into the sas of the SBox.

The pure water used will be provided by Alice, as the previous source in the workshop is not available.

 

  71   Wed Mar 30 18:53:01 2022 Manar AmerFixedreportmechanics | lasers and optics | utilitiesOptical roomDust Cleaning of SBox

The inside of the cavity was cleaned today. It was very dirty and had big dust particles and fibers inside.

Cleaning was done for everything; wall, floor, fixed mounts, wires (still have some dust difficult to remove), edges.

The dust meter average was measured outside the cavity (2471 p/m3 av 6 min)  and inside after cleaning (1424 p/m3 av 10 min).

The cavity was left open under the clean air flow, will observe it under UV, clean and measure Dust tomorrow.

Images attached are after cleaning.

Objects inside the cavity at the moment :

  • 4 main mirror mounts
  • 4 mirror fixers on mounts and 3 screws each (total 12)
  • 2 reflecting mirror mounts
  • 2 dielectric mirrors (mounted and to be cleaned)
  • two mounts for D-shaped mirrors.
  • 2 D-shaped mirrors (unmounted, and they will need cleaning)
  • 2 metal irises (pinholes)

 

Manar Amer wrote:

The cleaning was done twice with half an hour interval between the two times
reading on the dust meter was taken after each time, and it was zero averaged over a 10-min

Manar Amer wrote:

An Initial cleaning of the KBoX outside was done, All the optics and mechanics placed that were on the table were removed.

Only the old Mitylaser amplifier remains on the table.

Since we will be using the ThomX Celia amplifier, we will remove it and place it in a secure location (to be decided).

Tomorrow a cleaning of the inside of the cavity box is to be done.

 

 

Attachment 1: 20220330_SBox_Inside_Cavity_Box.jpg
20220330_SBox_Inside_Cavity_Box.jpg
Attachment 2: 20220330_Injection_Mount_UV.jpg
20220330_Injection_Mount_UV.jpg
Attachment 3: 20220330_Reflection_One_UV.jpg
20220330_Reflection_One_UV.jpg
Attachment 4: 20220330_Reflection_two_UV.jpg
20220330_Reflection_two_UV.jpg
Attachment 5: 20220330_Dust_Meter_Inside_cavity_Av10min.jpg
20220330_Dust_Meter_Inside_cavity_Av10min.jpg
Attachment 6: 20220330_Dust_Meter_Outside_cavity_Av6min.jpg
20220330_Dust_Meter_Outside_cavity_Av6min.jpg
  72   Thu Mar 31 13:29:01 2022 Manar AmerFixedreportmechanics | lasers and optics | utilitiesOptical roomDust Cleaning of SBox

After an overnight where the cavity box was left open, a measurement of the Dust meter was taken:

Outside on the optical table on direct air flux (1701 p/m3 Av 10 min) and

Inside the cavity box (998 p/m3 Av 10 min)

The dust inside the cavity has decreased by ~ 30 % for 0.3 u particles.

Note: the cavity box is still open.

Manar Amer wrote:

The inside of the cavity was cleaned today. It was very dirty and had big dust particles and fibers inside.

Cleaning was done for everything; wall, floor, fixed mounts, wires (still have some dust difficult to remove), edges.

The dust meter average was measured outside the cavity (2471 p/m3 av 6 min)  and inside after cleaning (1424 p/m3 av 10 min).

The cavity was left open under the clean air flow, will observe it under UV, clean and measure Dust tomorrow.

Images attached are after cleaning.

Objects inside the cavity at the moment :

  • 4 main mirror mounts
  • 4 mirror fixers on mounts and 3 screws each (total 12)
  • 2 reflecting mirror mounts
  • 2 dielectric mirrors (mounted and to be cleaned)
  • two mounts for D-shaped mirrors.
  • 2 D-shaped mirrors (unmounted, and they will need cleaning)
  • 2 metal irises (pinholes)

 

Manar Amer wrote:

The cleaning was done twice with half an hour interval between the two times
reading on the dust meter was taken after each time, and it was zero averaged over a 10-min

Manar Amer wrote:

An Initial cleaning of the KBoX outside was done, All the optics and mechanics placed that were on the table were removed.

Only the old Mitylaser amplifier remains on the table.

Since we will be using the ThomX Celia amplifier, we will remove it and place it in a secure location (to be decided).

Tomorrow a cleaning of the inside of the cavity box is to be done.

 

 

 

Attachment 1: 20220331_Dust_Meter_Outside_cavity_Av10min.jpg
20220331_Dust_Meter_Outside_cavity_Av10min.jpg
Attachment 2: 20220331_Dust_Meter_Inside_cavity_Av10min.jpg
20220331_Dust_Meter_Inside_cavity_Av10min.jpg
  73   Mon Apr 4 13:58:23 2022 Manar AmerFixedissuedetectors and electronics | utilitiesOptical roomClean Airflow Dust measurements

The dust meter cap was cleaned using Alcohol, and using the filter white cap the dust count was (0 Av. 10 min)

After the dust counter was hand held in direct airflow, it counted (1581 p/m3 Av. 2 min).

I tested the count also in the SAS, and it counted twice the amount ~ 4500 p/m3

Note: discussion on the next steps to take for the airflow filtering !!!!!!!!

  74   Fri Apr 8 19:27:12 2022 Manar AmerFixedissuedetectors and electronics | utilitiesOptical roomClean Airflow Dust measurements

Dust measurement done today on  top of the SBox average 10min

Manar Amer wrote:

The dust meter cap was cleaned using Alcohol, and using the filter white cap the dust count was (0 Av. 10 min)

After the dust counter was hand held in direct airflow, it counted (1581 p/m3 Av. 2 min).

I tested the count also in the SAS, and it counted twice the amount ~ 4500 p/m3

Note: discussion on the next steps to take for the airflow filtering !!!!!!!!

 

Attachment 1: 20220408_DustMeasurement.jpg
20220408_DustMeasurement.jpg
  75   Wed Apr 13 18:42:50 2022 Manar AmerFixedreportlasers and optics | utilitiesOptical roomSpincoater - Mirrror cleaning

Used the spincoater and pure water to clean dielectric mirrors which will be installed inside the SBox for directing the reflection line.

The method : place pure alchole on mirror - wipe it using white sterile tissue (in one direction) - clean with pure water in spincoater suing cotton swap .

After multible rounds, the result in the images was obtained. there is still a significant amount of dust particles (not all could be dust!!).

Not sure if the reason is the cleaning method ?? will invistegate it more !!!

Manar Amer wrote:

In preparation for cleaning the mirrors.

The spincoater has been moved with its bump into the sas of the SBox.

The pure water used will be provided by Alice, as the previous source in the workshop is not available.

 

 

Attachment 1: Reflection_one_front_after_cleaning.jpg
Reflection_one_front_after_cleaning.jpg
Attachment 2: reflection_two_front_before_cleaning.jpg
reflection_two_front_before_cleaning.jpg
Attachment 3: Reflection_two_front_after_cleaning.jpg
Reflection_two_front_after_cleaning.jpg
  76   Wed Apr 20 19:05:37 2022 Manar AmerFixedreportlasers and opticsOptical roomKBox Alignment

Starting with the alignment of the KBox using CW Koheras.

The size of the CW output from the collimator at 1 meter from is ~ 2.4 mm, to be adjusted with lenses to match the cavity !!! (attached image)

For the 2 alignment mirrors, I am only able to control 3 axes for now (motor issue for the fourth to be fixed !!) , Horizontal and vertical for Ma1 and Horizontal for Ma2(closes to injection window).

Started with only irises placed on both the M1 and M2. Placed a beam profiler at the window behind M2 to observe an output beam.

Motors position for the 3 axes and beam shape and position after M2 attached.

Attachment 1: CW_Koheras_1meter_ColimatorOutput_NE40A_NE10B_NE01A_Beam.bmp
Attachment 2: CW_Koheras_1meter_ColimatorOutput_NE40A_NE10B_NE01A_BeamFit.png
CW_Koheras_1meter_ColimatorOutput_NE40A_NE10B_NE01A_BeamFit.png
Attachment 3: Ma1_Horizontal_Position.png
Ma1_Horizontal_Position.png
Attachment 4: Ma1_Vertical_Position.png
Ma1_Vertical_Position.png
Attachment 5: Ma2_Horizontal_Position.png
Ma2_Horizontal_Position.png
Attachment 6: Transmission_M2_Irises_No_Mirrors_Beam.jpg
Transmission_M2_Irises_No_Mirrors_Beam.jpg
Attachment 7: Transmission_M2_Irises_No_Mirrors_BeamFit.png
Transmission_M2_Irises_No_Mirrors_BeamFit.png
  77   Mon Apr 25 17:28:29 2022 Manar AmerFixedreportlasers and opticsOptical roomSBox Alignment

SBox alignment, using CW laser Koheras power 1 mW

  • Finished M1 and M2 alignment using the diffraction patterns seen on the beam profiler,  the beam fit is not very good ?? (image taken)
  • Positions of Ma1 and Ma2 motors are registered (image taken)
  • Placed Fixed 2 irises at M1 window and M2 window (Image taken while both are closed)
  • Distance between the collimator and beam profiler ~ 2 m
  • Distance between collimator and M1 diaphragm   ~ 1 m
  • Distance between collimator and M2 diaphragm ~ 1.6 m 

 

Manar Amer wrote:

Starting with the alignment of the KBox using CW Koheras.

The size of the CW output from the collimator at 1 meter from is ~ 2.4 mm, to be adjusted with lenses to match the cavity !!! (attached image)

For the 2 alignment mirrors, I am only able to control 3 axes for now (motor issue for the fourth to be fixed !!) , Horizontal and vertical for Ma1 and Horizontal for Ma2(closes to injection window).

Started with only irises placed on both the M1 and M2. Placed a beam profiler at the window behind M2 to observe an output beam.

Motors position for the 3 axes and beam shape and position after M2 attached.

 

Attachment 1: SBox_Setup.jpg
SBox_Setup.jpg
Attachment 2: Ma1_Ma2_Horizontal_Position.png
Ma1_Ma2_Horizontal_Position.png
Attachment 3: Ma1_Ma2_Vertical_Position.png
Ma1_Ma2_Vertical_Position.png
Attachment 4: Output_afterM2_Diaghragm_On_M1_M2_Beam.jpg
Output_afterM2_Diaghragm_On_M1_M2_Beam.jpg
Attachment 5: Output_afterM2_Diaghragm_On_M1_M2_BeamFit.png
Output_afterM2_Diaghragm_On_M1_M2_BeamFit.png
Attachment 6: Output_afterM2_Diaghragm_On_M1_M2_Beam_Outside_Irises_Installed_and_Closed.jpg
Output_afterM2_Diaghragm_On_M1_M2_Beam_Outside_Irises_Installed_and_Closed.jpg
  78   Mon Apr 25 17:58:01 2022 Manar AmerFixedreportlasers and opticsOptical roomSBox Alignment

After pointers and Advice from Aurélien,

improvement of the beam alignment through M1 and M2 irises was done.

To improve the image on the beam profiler, I cleaned the alignment mirrors and the windows using pure ethanol and optical lens cleaning tissue,

a significant improvement after cleaning the inside of M2 Window. Images have less dust diffraction rings.

Attached new images of the beam:

  • New Ma1 and Ma2 motor position
  • After M1 pinhole optimized (saturated)
  • After M2 and M1 pinhole optimizing (saturated and not)
Manar Amer wrote:

SBox alignment, using CW laser Koheras power 1 mW

  • Finished M1 and M2 alignment using the diffraction patterns seen on the beam profiler,  the beam fit is not very good ?? (image taken)
  • Positions of Ma1 and Ma2 motors are registered (image taken)
  • Placed Fixed 2 irises at M1 window and M2 window (Image taken while both are closed)
  • Distance between the collimator and beam profiler ~ 2 m
  • Distance between collimator and M1 diaphragm   ~ 1 m
  • Distance between collimator and M2 diaphragm ~ 1.6 m 

 

Manar Amer wrote:

Starting with the alignment of the KBox using CW Koheras.

The size of the CW output from the collimator at 1 meter from is ~ 2.4 mm, to be adjusted with lenses to match the cavity !!! (attached image)

For the 2 alignment mirrors, I am only able to control 3 axes for now (motor issue for the fourth to be fixed !!) , Horizontal and vertical for Ma1 and Horizontal for Ma2(closes to injection window).

Started with only irises placed on both the M1 and M2. Placed a beam profiler at the window behind M2 to observe an output beam.

Motors position for the 3 axes and beam shape and position after M2 attached.

 

 

Attachment 1: Ma1_Ma2_Horizontal_Position_Optimized.png
Ma1_Ma2_Horizontal_Position_Optimized.png
Attachment 2: Ma1_Ma2_Vertical_Position_Optimized.png
Ma1_Ma2_Vertical_Position_Optimized.png
Attachment 3: After_M1_diaphram_1m_Saturated_Beam_Optimized.jpg
After_M1_diaphram_1m_Saturated_Beam_Optimized.jpg
Attachment 4: After_M2_M1_diaphram_Saturated_Beam_Optimized.jpg
After_M2_M1_diaphram_Saturated_Beam_Optimized.jpg
Attachment 5: After_M2_M1_diaphram_Beam_Optimized.jpg
After_M2_M1_diaphram_Beam_Optimized.jpg
ELOG V3.1.4-395e101