HOME SBOX THOMX MINICAV Utilities
SBOX orders SBOX installation SBOX commissioning SBOX control command
  Status of commissioning, report also here plots are reports., Page 4 of 13  Not logged in ELOG logo
Entry   100W CELIA laser amplifier "Power vs Pump current" curve, posted by Ronic Chiche at Optical room about lasers and optics | detectors and electronics CELIA_100W_amplifier_Power_vs_Current.png

We measured again the 100W CELIA laser amplifier with a pump current until 8A.

as the first current pump of the amplifier has a Peltier issue, we don't exceeded 6A on this stage and we compensated with the 3 other stages.

7A average current is obtained with 6A / 7.3A / 7.3A / 7.4A
7.5A average current is obtained with 6A / 8A / 8A / 8A
8A average current is obtained with 6A / 8.6A / 8.7A / 8.7A

we did the power measured either with the "big" powermeter which is able to handle 100W
and with a smaller powermeter after a wedge, in the reflection path, which is multiplied by 39 to match the big powermeter measurement.

a fit a 12W/A from the cut-off current of 2A is a good estimation until 5A.

Entry   Installation of the avalanche photodiode, posted by Ronic Chiche at Optical room about lasers and optics | detectors and electronics 

After installing the 2nd EOM, we had some trouble to be able to lock again.
One possible reason was the very low signal level in transmission, which is important to trigger the locking system (and stop it).

See the Alice post for details, but we were able to measure only once the Finesse of the cavity at around 2600.

After the Finesse measurement, we opened the box to change the M1 mirror... so the box is at ambient pressure now.

I took back the avalanche photodiode from the Minicav room and installed it on the setup to replace the FPC transmission photodiode.
Now, the transmission peaks are at the 1V level, and it's very easy to trigger on...
The system locked very easily, even without being under vacuum.
It will help if we need to inject very low power laser (e.g. OEwaves after 2x EOM and AOM).

 

Entry   Mightylaser Amplifier , posted by Manar Amer at Optical room about lasers and optics | cabling 

Migthylaser amplifier has been moved from the SBox table to the PLIC table.

 

Entry   Cavity polarization states (Koheras), Finesse of 2 polarization states, posted by Loïc Amoudry at Optical room about lasers and optics Finesse_higher.isfFinesse_lower.isfThe2polarizations_states_direct_trans.isfThe2polarizations_states_direct_trans.png

Measurments of Finesse with the 2 polarization states, let's call them H (higher) and L (lower): 24500 for the H and 23500 for the L.

We checked the polarization states in transmission of the FP cavity after a PBS. The H was stronger in PBS trans and the L stronger in PBS ref.

We measured the power in reflection of the PBS and added a half WP that we aligned with the PBS polarization. Then, to get the maximum power we had to tilt the half WP of 22° for the H and 18° for the L.

Finally we checked the extinction through half WP and PBS for H and L. 

- For H : max 75 mW min 5 mW. Ratio 6.66%

- For L : max 70 mW min 4 mW. Ratio 5.7%

Right after Koheras : max 3.5 mW min 47 uW. Ratio 1.3%

 

Entry   Phase measurement with HASO, posted by Loïc Amoudry at Optical room about lasers and optics 180928_M2_0A.has1801001_input_0A.has180928_M2_trans_0A.txt

2 measurement.

First one locked, in transmission of M2 with 2nd stage 0A.Total 89 cm from the big waist (planar mirrors). 2 wedges used.

Second one at input beam with the same power. Datas taken at the same equivalent position than the first one. 3 wedges used.

    Reply   Phase measurement with HASO, posted by Loïc Amoudry at Optical room about lasers and optics 8x

* Loic has to fix the number of files (3) regarding the number of measurements (2)

* splitted Intensity and phase HASO files

* image for each file

Loïc Amoudry wrote:

2 measurement.

First one locked, in transmission of M2 with 2nd stage 0A.Total 89 cm from the big waist (planar mirrors). 2 wedges used.

Second one at input beam with the same power. Datas taken at the same equivalent position than the first one. 3 wedges used.

 

    Reply   Phase measurement with HASO, posted by Loïc Amoudry at Optical room about lasers and optics 

with just intensity, the coupling is 98%, and with phase, x direction coupling is 95%, y direction 97%, so the telescope is good.

Loïc Amoudry wrote:

* Loic has to fix the number of files (3) regarding the number of measurements (2)

* splitted Intensity and phase HASO files

* image for each file

Loïc Amoudry wrote:

2 measurement.

First one locked, in transmission of M2 with 2nd stage 0A.Total 89 cm from the big waist (planar mirrors). 2 wedges used.

Second one at input beam with the same power. Datas taken at the same equivalent position than the first one. 3 wedges used.

 

 

Entry   Polarization optimization, posted by Loïc Amoudry at Optical room about lasers and optics 

Optimization of the polarization has been made the 03/10/18. Checked in reflection of the cavity in reflection&transmission of a PBS, locked and unlocked. Only with 2nd stage.

Ratio values are reflection of PBS divided by transmission or the opposite.

  Unlock value Ratio min/max Lock value Ratio min/max
No optimization        
Reflection 1.21 X 3.89 X
Transmission 14.3 8.5 % 3.1 80 %
Only Lambda/2        
Reflection 4.4 X 2.91 X
Transmission 11 40 % 2.79 96 %
2xLambda/2 + 1Lambda/4        
Reflection 8.3 X 3.4 X
Transmission 6.8 82 % 2.2 65 %
Same + PID optimization        
Reflection 9 X 3.35 X
Transmission 5.76 64 %  2 60 %

 

Entry   Record power-up, posted by Loïc Amoudry at Optical room about lasers and optics 

Measurement made on 03/10/18 (nothing has been done since there).

Stable power in the cavity of 225 kW.

3rd stage current Transmission (mW) Pin (W)
0 8 0.37
2   5.3
2.2 145 6.4
3   10.7
4 350 16.1
5   21.8
6   27.3
7   32
8   36.7
8.5 640 39.1

 

Entry   Transmission vs D-shape position at different powe, posted by Loïc Amoudry at Optical room about lasers and optics Plot_matlab.JPGmotors.xlsxPower_stored_vs_Dshape_mirrors_position.m

Measurements have been done on 18/10/18.

Datas are on excel file, also matlab file.

Entry   Beam size vs D-shape position, posted by Loïc Amoudry at Optical room about lasers and optics 181018_4A_no_cut.PNG

Measurement done on 18/10/18.

At high power, the shape of the 0.0 mode does not change. The D-shape only generate losses in the cavity. Then the power stored in the cavity decrease. As with this configuration, the cavity beam size decrease when power increase, the beam size decreased.

Measurements done @4A on 3rd stage.

x (um) y (um) Picomotors displacement (um) Transmission power (mW)
1820 2013 0 337
1820 2013 200 330
1925 2029 400 306
1936 2090 600 245
2117 2249 800 125
2260 2392 1000 17

Then we get the D-shape away from the beam to not cut it and decreased the amplifier power to validate the beam size at a known value. So the power as been decreased to 2A (= 125 mW in trans) and the beam size was x=2079 y=2255, similar to the 125 mW with D-shape mirrors values.

    Reply   Beam size vs D-shape position, posted by Loïc Amoudry at Optical room about lasers and optics size_vs_position_and_power.JPG

Matlab code for size vs position and power : 

clear all
close all

x = [1820 1820 1925 1936 2117 2260];
y = [2013 2013 2029 2090 2249 2392];
Position = [0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1];
Trans = [337 330 306 245 128 17]

hold on
[ax,h1,h2] = plotyy(Position,x,Position,Trans)
set(get(ax(1), 'Ylabel'), 'String', 'Beam diameter (um)');
set(get(ax(2), 'Ylabel'), 'String', 'Transmitted power (mW)');
xlabel('Position of the D-shape (mm)')
plot(Position,y,'g')
hold off

Loïc Amoudry wrote:

Measurement done on 18/10/18.

At high power, the shape of the 0.0 mode does not change. The D-shape only generate losses in the cavity. Then the power stored in the cavity decrease. As with this configuration, the cavity beam size decrease when power increase, the beam size decreased.

Measurements done @4A on 3rd stage.

x (um) y (um) Picomotors displacement (um) Transmission power (mW)
1820 2013 0 337
1820 2013 200 330
1925 2029 400 306
1936 2090 600 245
2117 2249 800 125
2260 2392 1000 17

Then we get the D-shape away from the beam to not cut it and decreased the amplifier power to validate the beam size at a known value. So the power as been decreased to 2A (= 125 mW in trans) and the beam size was x=2079 y=2255, similar to the 125 mW with D-shape mirrors values.

 

Entry   Finesse vs power by difference between main and second resonance, posted by Loïc Amoudry at Optical room about lasers and optics CrossSecondaryResonance.mGetCavity.m

Measurements show that ratio decrease versus power. BUT, the second resonance measurement induce lower power in the cavity so the ratio is not directly true.

Also, simulation of the main/second resonance power by Pierre's simulation has shown ratio ~50, ~47.6 and 43.5 respectively for 0A, 2A and 4A.

I (A) Main resonance (mW) Second resonance (mW) Ratio
0 8.07 0.416 19.4
2 121 6.77 17.9
4 324 20.2 16

 

Entry   Polarization frequency, posted by Loïc Amoudry at Optical room about lasers and optics 

Check of the frequency of the onefive locked on each polarization of the cavity (tilt a waveplate by 45°).

Frequency repetition rate : 133.335 MHz on spectrum analyzer for both polarization locked.

    Reply   Polarization frequency, posted by Loïc Amoudry at Optical room about lasers and optics 

Measurement on 30/10/18.

Loïc Amoudry wrote:

Check of the frequency of the onefive locked on each polarization of the cavity (tilt a waveplate by 45°).

Frequency repetition rate : 133.335 MHz on spectrum analyzer for both polarization locked.

 

    Reply   Finesse vs power by difference between main and second resonance, posted by Loïc Amoudry at Optical room about lasers and optics 

Measurement on 24/10/18

Loïc Amoudry wrote:

Measurements show that ratio decrease versus power. BUT, the second resonance measurement induce lower power in the cavity so the ratio is not directly true.

Also, simulation of the main/second resonance power by Pierre's simulation has shown ratio ~50, ~47.6 and 43.5 respectively for 0A, 2A and 4A.

I (A) Main resonance (mW) Second resonance (mW) Ratio
0 8.07 0.416 19.4
2 121 6.77 17.9
4 324 20.2 16

 

 

    Reply   Finesse vs power by difference between main and second resonance, posted by Loïc Amoudry at Optical room about lasers and optics 

Measurement on 25/10/2018

Loïc Amoudry wrote:

Measurements show that ratio decrease versus power. BUT, the second resonance measurement induce lower power in the cavity so the ratio is not directly true.

Also, simulation of the main/second resonance power by Pierre's simulation has shown ratio ~50, ~47.6 and 43.5 respectively for 0A, 2A and 4A.

I (A) Main resonance (mW) Second resonance (mW) Ratio
0 8.07 0.416 19.4
2 121 6.77 17.9
4 324 20.2 16

 

 

Entry   M1 transmission measurement, posted by Loïc Amoudry at Optical room about lasers and optics 

Center of M1:

I (A) Input power (mW) Transmitted power (mW) Transmission (ppm)
0 78 0.01477 189
4 16500 3.2 194
Entry   Change of the 3 ULE mirrors by 3 spare ULE mirrors, posted by Loïc Amoudry at Optical room about lasers and optics Miroirs_à_1031_nm-ThomX_-_décembre2017.pdfvacuum.isf

First finesse measurement 20 266, FSR 133.351 MHz under vacuum

Entry   M4 transmission measurement, posted by Loïc Amoudry at Optical room about lasers and optics 

The kept transmission for M4 is 2.17 ppm. Which is the value measured after alignement (center of the mirror).

These measurements have been taken before alignement.

I (A) Input power (mW) Transmitted power after window (mW) Transmission (ppm)
0 74.3 195.2e-6 2.63
0 73.5 212.8e-6 2.89
0 52.4 151e-6 2.88
6 28 400 72e-3 2.54

High dependence against the position. Few measurement several mm away from the center each one at different position give 194, 193, 208, 200 ppm.

ELOG V3.1.4-395e101