100W CELIA laser amplifier "Power vs Pump current" curve, posted by Ronic Chiche at Optical room about lasers and optics | detectors and electronics
|
We measured again the 100W CELIA laser amplifier with a pump current until 8A.
as the first current pump of the amplifier has a Peltier issue, we don't exceeded 6A on this stage and we compensated with the 3 other stages.
7A average current is obtained with 6A / 7.3A / 7.3A / 7.4A
7.5A average current is obtained with 6A / 8A / 8A / 8A
8A average current is obtained with 6A / 8.6A / 8.7A / 8.7A
we did the power measured either with the "big" powermeter which is able to handle 100W
and with a smaller powermeter after a wedge, in the reflection path, which is multiplied by 39 to match the big powermeter measurement.
a fit a 12W/A from the cut-off current of 2A is a good estimation until 5A. |
Installation of the avalanche photodiode, posted by Ronic Chiche at Optical room about lasers and optics | detectors and electronics
|
After installing the 2nd EOM, we had some trouble to be able to lock again.
One possible reason was the very low signal level in transmission, which is important to trigger the locking system (and stop it).
See the Alice post for details, but we were able to measure only once the Finesse of the cavity at around 2600.
After the Finesse measurement, we opened the box to change the M1 mirror... so the box is at ambient pressure now.
I took back the avalanche photodiode from the Minicav room and installed it on the setup to replace the FPC transmission photodiode.
Now, the transmission peaks are at the 1V level, and it's very easy to trigger on...
The system locked very easily, even without being under vacuum.
It will help if we need to inject very low power laser (e.g. OEwaves after 2x EOM and AOM).
|
Mightylaser Amplifier , posted by Manar Amer at Optical room about lasers and optics | cabling
|
Migthylaser amplifier has been moved from the SBox table to the PLIC table.
|
Cavity polarization states (Koheras), Finesse of 2 polarization states, posted by Loïc Amoudry at Optical room about lasers and optics   
|
Measurments of Finesse with the 2 polarization states, let's call them H (higher) and L (lower): 24500 for the H and 23500 for the L.
We checked the polarization states in transmission of the FP cavity after a PBS. The H was stronger in PBS trans and the L stronger in PBS ref.
We measured the power in reflection of the PBS and added a half WP that we aligned with the PBS polarization. Then, to get the maximum power we had to tilt the half WP of 22° for the H and 18° for the L.
Finally we checked the extinction through half WP and PBS for H and L.
- For H : max 75 mW min 5 mW. Ratio 6.66%
- For L : max 70 mW min 4 mW. Ratio 5.7%
Right after Koheras : max 3.5 mW min 47 uW. Ratio 1.3%
|
Phase measurement with HASO, posted by Loïc Amoudry at Optical room about lasers and optics  
|
2 measurement.
First one locked, in transmission of M2 with 2nd stage 0A.Total 89 cm from the big waist (planar mirrors). 2 wedges used.
Second one at input beam with the same power. Datas taken at the same equivalent position than the first one. 3 wedges used. |
Phase measurement with HASO, posted by Loïc Amoudry at Optical room about lasers and optics 8x
|
* Loic has to fix the number of files (3) regarding the number of measurements (2)
* splitted Intensity and phase HASO files
* image for each file
| Loïc Amoudry wrote: |
|
2 measurement.
First one locked, in transmission of M2 with 2nd stage 0A.Total 89 cm from the big waist (planar mirrors). 2 wedges used.
Second one at input beam with the same power. Datas taken at the same equivalent position than the first one. 3 wedges used.
|
|
Phase measurement with HASO, posted by Loïc Amoudry at Optical room about lasers and optics
|
with just intensity, the coupling is 98%, and with phase, x direction coupling is 95%, y direction 97%, so the telescope is good.
| Loïc Amoudry wrote: |
|
* Loic has to fix the number of files (3) regarding the number of measurements (2)
* splitted Intensity and phase HASO files
* image for each file
| Loïc Amoudry wrote: |
|
2 measurement.
First one locked, in transmission of M2 with 2nd stage 0A.Total 89 cm from the big waist (planar mirrors). 2 wedges used.
Second one at input beam with the same power. Datas taken at the same equivalent position than the first one. 3 wedges used.
|
|
|
Polarization optimization, posted by Loïc Amoudry at Optical room about lasers and optics
|
Optimization of the polarization has been made the 03/10/18. Checked in reflection of the cavity in reflection&transmission of a PBS, locked and unlocked. Only with 2nd stage.
Ratio values are reflection of PBS divided by transmission or the opposite.
| |
Unlock value |
Ratio min/max |
Lock value |
Ratio min/max |
| No optimization |
|
|
|
|
| Reflection |
1.21 |
X |
3.89 |
X |
| Transmission |
14.3 |
8.5 % |
3.1 |
80 % |
| Only Lambda/2 |
|
|
|
|
| Reflection |
4.4 |
X |
2.91 |
X |
| Transmission |
11 |
40 % |
2.79 |
96 % |
| 2xLambda/2 + 1Lambda/4 |
|
|
|
|
| Reflection |
8.3 |
X |
3.4 |
X |
| Transmission |
6.8 |
82 % |
2.2 |
65 % |
| Same + PID optimization |
|
|
|
|
| Reflection |
9 |
X |
3.35 |
X |
| Transmission |
5.76 |
64 % |
2 |
60 % |
|
Record power-up, posted by Loïc Amoudry at Optical room about lasers and optics
|
Measurement made on 03/10/18 (nothing has been done since there).
Stable power in the cavity of 225 kW.
| 3rd stage current |
Transmission (mW) |
Pin (W) |
| 0 |
8 |
0.37 |
| 2 |
|
5.3 |
| 2.2 |
145 |
6.4 |
| 3 |
|
10.7 |
| 4 |
350 |
16.1 |
| 5 |
|
21.8 |
| 6 |
|
27.3 |
| 7 |
|
32 |
| 8 |
|
36.7 |
| 8.5 |
640 |
39.1 |
|
Transmission vs D-shape position at different powe, posted by Loïc Amoudry at Optical room about lasers and optics  
|
Measurements have been done on 18/10/18.
Datas are on excel file, also matlab file. |
Beam size vs D-shape position, posted by Loïc Amoudry at Optical room about lasers and optics
|
Measurement done on 18/10/18.
At high power, the shape of the 0.0 mode does not change. The D-shape only generate losses in the cavity. Then the power stored in the cavity decrease. As with this configuration, the cavity beam size decrease when power increase, the beam size decreased.
Measurements done @4A on 3rd stage.
| x (um) |
y (um) |
Picomotors displacement (um) |
Transmission power (mW) |
| 1820 |
2013 |
0 |
337 |
| 1820 |
2013 |
200 |
330 |
| 1925 |
2029 |
400 |
306 |
| 1936 |
2090 |
600 |
245 |
| 2117 |
2249 |
800 |
125 |
| 2260 |
2392 |
1000 |
17 |
Then we get the D-shape away from the beam to not cut it and decreased the amplifier power to validate the beam size at a known value. So the power as been decreased to 2A (= 125 mW in trans) and the beam size was x=2079 y=2255, similar to the 125 mW with D-shape mirrors values. |
Beam size vs D-shape position, posted by Loïc Amoudry at Optical room about lasers and optics
|
Matlab code for size vs position and power :
clear all
close all
x = [1820 1820 1925 1936 2117 2260];
y = [2013 2013 2029 2090 2249 2392];
Position = [0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1];
Trans = [337 330 306 245 128 17]
hold on
[ax,h1,h2] = plotyy(Position,x,Position,Trans)
set(get(ax(1), 'Ylabel'), 'String', 'Beam diameter (um)');
set(get(ax(2), 'Ylabel'), 'String', 'Transmitted power (mW)');
xlabel('Position of the D-shape (mm)')
plot(Position,y,'g')
hold off
| Loïc Amoudry wrote: |
|
Measurement done on 18/10/18.
At high power, the shape of the 0.0 mode does not change. The D-shape only generate losses in the cavity. Then the power stored in the cavity decrease. As with this configuration, the cavity beam size decrease when power increase, the beam size decreased.
Measurements done @4A on 3rd stage.
| x (um) |
y (um) |
Picomotors displacement (um) |
Transmission power (mW) |
| 1820 |
2013 |
0 |
337 |
| 1820 |
2013 |
200 |
330 |
| 1925 |
2029 |
400 |
306 |
| 1936 |
2090 |
600 |
245 |
| 2117 |
2249 |
800 |
125 |
| 2260 |
2392 |
1000 |
17 |
Then we get the D-shape away from the beam to not cut it and decreased the amplifier power to validate the beam size at a known value. So the power as been decreased to 2A (= 125 mW in trans) and the beam size was x=2079 y=2255, similar to the 125 mW with D-shape mirrors values.
|
|
Finesse vs power by difference between main and second resonance, posted by Loïc Amoudry at Optical room about lasers and optics 
|
Measurements show that ratio decrease versus power. BUT, the second resonance measurement induce lower power in the cavity so the ratio is not directly true.
Also, simulation of the main/second resonance power by Pierre's simulation has shown ratio ~50, ~47.6 and 43.5 respectively for 0A, 2A and 4A.
| I (A) |
Main resonance (mW) |
Second resonance (mW) |
Ratio |
| 0 |
8.07 |
0.416 |
19.4 |
| 2 |
121 |
6.77 |
17.9 |
| 4 |
324 |
20.2 |
16 |
|
Polarization frequency, posted by Loïc Amoudry at Optical room about lasers and optics
|
Check of the frequency of the onefive locked on each polarization of the cavity (tilt a waveplate by 45°).
Frequency repetition rate : 133.335 MHz on spectrum analyzer for both polarization locked. |
Polarization frequency, posted by Loïc Amoudry at Optical room about lasers and optics
|
Measurement on 30/10/18.
| Loïc Amoudry wrote: |
|
Check of the frequency of the onefive locked on each polarization of the cavity (tilt a waveplate by 45°).
Frequency repetition rate : 133.335 MHz on spectrum analyzer for both polarization locked.
|
|
Finesse vs power by difference between main and second resonance, posted by Loïc Amoudry at Optical room about lasers and optics
|
Measurement on 24/10/18
| Loïc Amoudry wrote: |
|
Measurements show that ratio decrease versus power. BUT, the second resonance measurement induce lower power in the cavity so the ratio is not directly true.
Also, simulation of the main/second resonance power by Pierre's simulation has shown ratio ~50, ~47.6 and 43.5 respectively for 0A, 2A and 4A.
| I (A) |
Main resonance (mW) |
Second resonance (mW) |
Ratio |
| 0 |
8.07 |
0.416 |
19.4 |
| 2 |
121 |
6.77 |
17.9 |
| 4 |
324 |
20.2 |
16 |
|
|
Finesse vs power by difference between main and second resonance, posted by Loïc Amoudry at Optical room about lasers and optics
|
Measurement on 25/10/2018
| Loïc Amoudry wrote: |
|
Measurements show that ratio decrease versus power. BUT, the second resonance measurement induce lower power in the cavity so the ratio is not directly true.
Also, simulation of the main/second resonance power by Pierre's simulation has shown ratio ~50, ~47.6 and 43.5 respectively for 0A, 2A and 4A.
| I (A) |
Main resonance (mW) |
Second resonance (mW) |
Ratio |
| 0 |
8.07 |
0.416 |
19.4 |
| 2 |
121 |
6.77 |
17.9 |
| 4 |
324 |
20.2 |
16 |
|
|
M1 transmission measurement, posted by Loïc Amoudry at Optical room about lasers and optics
|
Center of M1:
| I (A) |
Input power (mW) |
Transmitted power (mW) |
Transmission (ppm) |
| 0 |
78 |
0.01477 |
189 |
| 4 |
16500 |
3.2 |
194 |
|
Change of the 3 ULE mirrors by 3 spare ULE mirrors, posted by Loïc Amoudry at Optical room about lasers and optics 
|
First finesse measurement 20 266, FSR 133.351 MHz under vacuum |
M4 transmission measurement, posted by Loïc Amoudry at Optical room about lasers and optics
|
The kept transmission for M4 is 2.17 ppm. Which is the value measured after alignement (center of the mirror).
These measurements have been taken before alignement.
| I (A) |
Input power (mW) |
Transmitted power after window (mW) |
Transmission (ppm) |
| 0 |
74.3 |
195.2e-6 |
2.63 |
| 0 |
73.5 |
212.8e-6 |
2.89 |
| 0 |
52.4 |
151e-6 |
2.88 |
| 6 |
28 400 |
72e-3 |
2.54 |
High dependence against the position. Few measurement several mm away from the center each one at different position give 194, 193, 208, 200 ppm. |