Today, the power measured at the input of the amplifier (PD_IN on the LAL amplifier software) is 2.5mW instead of >3mW generally measured

The power coming from the NKT/Onefive Origami oscillator is still >37mW (measured directly with the powermeter at the laser output without OD2).

thus, the problem should come from:

- the strecher/fiber alignment.

- or maybe from a wavelength shift of the oscillator

we confirmed the effect of the bunker temperature on the laser amplifier "beam pointing" fluctuations.
once the temperature is getting back to stable values, it doesn't happend again.

we bought a temperature data logguer to monitor them in the future: https://www.picotech.com/data-logger/tc-08/thermocouple-data-logger

this post close this thread.

from several weeks, the maximum power stored in the FP-cavity was ~ 5kW.

today with Daniele, we finished to investigate the problem, and now the power inside the FP-cavity is back to ~50kW for 30% of laser amplifier ratio (~16W).

we optimized the signal received by the PDH photodiode by installing a large DET100 to collect more light.

if one installs a small photodiode (DET10) in the middle of the beam, the carrier signal when a FP-cavity crosses a resonance is larger because the photodiode "sees" only the part of the beam which is geometrically coupled to the cavity in its small active area, but :
1- once we will improve the geometrical coupling, the part of the incoming beam coupled to the FP-cavity will increase.
2- one need to work with a diffuser in front of this photodiode to precisely adapt the feedback loops gain : in that case the photodiode is sensitive to the whole input beam, whatever his active area size.
so, we decide to put a DET100 (which is given for 35ns rise time / 10MHz BW when connected on 50ohms).

see the scheme in attached file.
and a picture of the desktop with all the lock parameters :

the quality of the lock, seen on the reflected power signal is very good !
and the stability is only limited by the necessity to act on the laser Smaract motors to let the PZT in its working range.
dark blue : transmitted signal
green : PZT
pink : error signal
light blue : reflected signal

conclusion : it is not clear that the cavity Finesse have significantly increased during the last weeks, as we are roughly at the same level than before (47kW).
but as we precisely adapted the signal levels in the feedback scheme (PDH S/N ratio and Laselock parameters), the result is a more stable lock.
 

today, the equivalent Smaract position corresponding to the 500.25MHz ring frequency is +156µm on MCS-1/ch0 (closed loop mode)

today, we locked the FP cavity at ~50kW with 30% laser amplifier ratio (16W) during almost all the day (from 10am to 4pm)
CEP optimized for MCS-1/Ch2 = -244µm at the end of the day.

once one finds the proper CEP value to reach to correct loops gain, the cavity lock and power are very stable:
one looses the lock only when one needs to use the Smaract motors to follow the long temperature drifts.
several elements of the ThomX machine have been powered ON progressively during the lock without any lock perturbation excepting for a very short time when switching ON the RF cavity (to be confirmed) and when one tried to inject electrons into the ring (loss of the electrons after few turns only)... but it's not very clear. the lock is still stable but some time one sees a lock loss without "reason"... could it be the electron loss or some bad compensation of the noise due to feedback, it's hard to say.

at the end of the day, I had to realign the FP-cavity injection and change the CEP more often than in the morning,
and surprisingly, the intra-cavity power drops a little bit at the begining of the lock (~50kW) and after some tenth of seconds (=> ~47-48kW).
it is not so much but it is very repeatable at each try.
I tried to optimize the CEP, the injection alignment, the PID parameters => it helps but at the end, I still have this slow power drop of few kW over tenth of seconds that I didn't see at the begining of the day... to be investigated.

temperature stable around 20.8°C

today, the equivalent Smaract position corresponding to the 500.25MHz ring frequency is +158.4µm on MCS-1/ch0 (closed loop mode)

it is very difficult to maintain both loops in the same time as soon as it is needed to move one motor (CFP or Laser) because of the one element (RF reference or Laser or CFP) is drifting in frequency.

to try to understand why these 3 elements seems to drift so fast one from each other, we only measure the beating frequency between the RF reference and the free running laser (without lock of the CFP)... and we see a drift around several Hz by second of the beating signal => who is guilty ? Laser or RF synthesizer ?

one can compare their respective phase noise to have an idea of their relative phase/frequency stability :

the OneFive phase noise gives +40dBc/Hz  @10Hz offset in optical frequency which is 300000 (110dB) more than at 1GHz => 40 - 110 = -70dBc/Hz @10Hz offset @ 1GHz

to be compared to the SMA100A which gives -85dBc/Hz @10Hz offset @ 1GHz

conclusion : the RF reference should be more stable in long term and the drifts we see should come from the laser...

Kevin moved the M4 mirror controller from the ISP controller to some ICEPAP controller.

the IHM to access this ICEPAP controller is accessible by launching 'jive' from any account ('operateur.thomx' for example).

once in the jive window, one has to select the 'device' tab, then select the OC=>OP=>OCH.02-MOT.03 device.

an AtkPanel is launched in which one can change the step values which are direclty the motor steps.

as the temperature is back to a normal value ~ 20.8°C, the injected power to the amplifier (PD_IN in the Alphanov software) is back to 3.15mW without doing any alignment.

this morning the lock was around 48.5kW with 30% laser amplifier ratio (16W) after CEP/alignment tuning.

temperature since we moved to temperature probe (jump at the beginning of the plot) below the ring on a metallic base.

temperature stable around 21.7°C

today, the equivalent Smaract position corresponding to the 500.25MHz ring frequency is +147µm on MCS-1/ch0 (closed loop mode)

one problem is the FP-cavity/laser lock loss when one moves a FP-cavity motor.

with acceleration = 0.01 units/s² and velocity = 50mm/s (here, the 'mm' unit seems strange as it is very fast), it's enough to make a move fast enough for small displacements (10 steps for example to center PZT position) and it seems that the cavity stays locked (only the FP-cavity/laser is locked).

=> to be checked when both FP-cavity/laser and FP-cavity/RF-reference feedback loops are running.

temperature @ 22.3°C

today, all the PC applications were closed except the web browser.
I had to restart all of them, then try to relock.
(maybe I let the terminal window open with all the apps and someone tried to unlog by removing them ?)

the cavity height was pretty misaligned.
after a rough alignment, the power inside the cavity was back at 49kW for 30% amplifier ratio.

the CEP motor needs to be adjusted a lot during the cavity heating process

temperature @ 21.9°C

48.5kW inside CFP for 30% amplifier ratio

Frep Laser motor = 123.4µm
CEP motor = -67.8µm

below the image of the relative voltage range between CFP PZT (pink) and laser PZT (green).
the CFP PZT is driven by 10x the voltage range showed by the scope (0-100V HV output and 0-10V monitor on the Laselock)
one can see on the scope that the relative range of both PZT voltage range is roughly the same which means that the real CFP PZT sensitivity is 10x smaller than the Laser PZT sensitivity.
as the CFP PZT is driven by 0-100V and the Laser PZT is driven by 0-10V voltages, they have approximately the same range which is ~200nm (calibrated with the Laser motor in closed loop mode).

in a previous email, the CFP PZT should be given with a sensitivty of about 4nm/V => 400nm/100V of length range => 800nm/100V of CFP roundtrip range => 80e-9/100V of relative sensitivity => 40Hz of frequency peak-peak range for 500MHz carrier frequency.
there is a discrepancy between measurements (~10Hz peak-peak range for 500MHz carrier) and expected value !

as the CFP motors displacements induce a cavity unlock, we try to change the cavity length by changing the temperature of elment of the cavity.

yesterday, we tried to put a "heating cable" borrowed to the vacuum group to change the temperature of one bellows between the FP-cavity and the electron ring.
we chose a below because it is flexible and should not apply a too strong force on the cavity vessels.
we heated the cable at ~30°C but we didn't see a clear effect on the FP-cavity frequency measurement.

then, we put a heating cable around the X-ray output flange of the FP-cavity vessel and we saw a clear effect : a relatively fast (at a "second" level) frequency change.
the problem is the heating system is not remotely driven.

the cable is R=55ohms impedance and can reach 450°C for 1kW dissipated.
so today, we will try to use 2 remotely controlled Siglent SPD3303X power supplies.
they can reach V=120V DC => P=V²/R=260W => we could reach more than 100°C

bunker temperature @ 22.5°C

today, Sebastien Pitrel improved its python software to manually control the laser peltier.
we were able to make to some test. unfortunately, doing only one step change the 500MHz relative frequency by ~400Hz (see the attached plot from 480Hz to 100Hz which is the laser harmonic @500MHz compared to the RF reference @500MHz), which is equivalent to a round trip length variation of 8µm !!!
the present PZT's ranges are equivalent to 400nm of the round trip length. the laser PZT range could be extended by a factor 10 if one drives it using 100V instead of 10V actually, but it would not be enough to be able to use the Peltier ! :-(

if the Peltier changes the inox baseplate of the laser, the relative length change is 1e-5 /K which is equivalent to 100µm/K of the round trip length.
it means the internal temperature steps, done by the peltier, are around 0.08K.
maybe we could try to have smaller steps by using an external thermal setup ?

laser cavity :

when one decreases the laser motor position, the laser repetition rate increases (laser cavity length decreases).
=> +/- laser motor step  =>  +/- laser cavity roundtrip length => -/+ laser repetition rate => -/+ laser harmonic @500MHz 
=> +/- 100nm => +/- 200nm => -/+ 0.7Hz @33.33MHz => -/+ 10Hz @500MHz

here is the natural variation of the laser cavity frequency beating with RF @500MHz over 1h (~1.6s / iteration)
one can see some oscillations equivalent to ~1µm of roundtrip length with ~10 minutes period and maybe a slower drift or oscillation with ~2µm of roundtrip range over the hour.
I mention that I moved the laser "PZT" motor before taking the data : could it be the reason of the 10-20min oscillations ?

during the same time, here is a probe temperature curve (the probe in stuck on the end flange, close to X-hutch, of the FP-cavity, inside the housing... not close to the laser position).
the temperature variation range is ~2.5/100 °C which induces on inox (relative length thermal effect : 17e-6 /K) a length variation of 4µm of roundtrip (10m) which could be compatible to the laser cavity length variation measured.

Now, I placed a temperature probe stuck on the laser housing itself.

fig. 1

one can compare the temperature measured at the surface of the laser housing and the beating frequency with the 500MHz reference oscillator
one sees a possible very long term correlation but there is no correlation at the minute level when we see the frequency oscillation after t=2000s.

the laser housing temperature seems not to induce directly a frequency variation.

fig 2 / 3

we applied 15W on the heating wire rolled around the FP-cavity flange.
in red, we see the temperature increasing on the probe rolled around the wire, reaching almost 30°C.
we heat the inside of the housing (airflow stopped) during more than 30 minutes
in green, we don't see any variation (even if one makes a zoom) of the temperature of the probe stuck on the laser housing.

in same time, on fig 3, one can see the frequency drift.
there is no correlation between the oscillations and the temperature.

CONCLUSION :
the laser frequency fluctuations does not seem to come from the outside temperature.
 

the last thing we did with Daniele, is to start/stop the airflow on top of the housing (closed) to see a possible pressure effect on the laser frequency drift.

fig 1 : in green, the temperature measured with the probe stuck on the laser housing.
one can clearly see the 2 "start - wait ~10mins - stop" we did at 16h50 then at 17h30.
the air temperature blowed by the airflow is cooler than the housing temperature and we see the effect on the probe.

fig 2 : this is the laser frequency drift during the 1st airflow start/stop
the airflow has been turned on at 100 iterations and stopped at 500 iterations (~5 mins)
we don't see any correlation

fig 3 : this is again the laser frequency drift during the 2nd airflow start/stop
the airflow has been turned on at 1850 iterations and stopped at 2550 iterations (~10 mins)
we don't see any correlation

CONCLUSION : neither external temperature change or pressure variations can explain the 10-20min period oscillations observed on the laser frequency variations.
it can be either the laser temperature regulation or the RF reference oscillator temperature regulation (due to the oven of the quartz)

today, I swapped the 500MHz RF reference oscillator for a Siglent 500MHz DDS oscillator.

see the attached plot : the beating frequency with the 500MHz laser harmonics produces the same behavior as before.
so, the oscillations should come from the laser temperature regulation.