20Hz oscillation in the locking between Laser and FP-cavity, posted by Ronic Chiche at ThomX igloo about mechanics | lasers and optics | detectors and electronics
|
this morning, we tried to find the origin of the 20Hz oscillation.
- we switched OFF the laser Smaract motors controller => no change
- then, we addionally disconnected the FP-cavity PZT cable from the Laselock (we put a charge of 1kohm) => no change |
20Hz oscillation in the locking between Laser and FP-cavity, posted by Ronic Chiche at ThomX igloo about mechanics | lasers and optics | detectors and electronics
|
this afternoon, we did 2 tests to better understand this 20Hz oscillation:
- we locked the amplified laser directly to the 500MHz ring reference oscillator, without any intermediate locking to the FP-cavity => no
change |
Variable focal lens validation, posted by Ronic Chiche at ThomX igloo about lasers and optics 
|
we plan to use Electrically Tunable Lenses EL-10-30-C NIR to build the ThomX telescope but they need to be compatible with the powerful laser beam.
for CW regime, on the datasheet (see attached file), the optical damage threshold is 10 kW/cm².
with 70W laser power and 1mm² beam surface (which is much smaller than the real beam size), we are at 7kW/cm². |
|
20Hz oscillation in the locking between Laser and FP-cavity, posted by Ronic Chiche at ThomX igloo about mechanics | lasers and optics | detectors and electronics
|
yesterday I did 2 tests to try to understand the origin of the 20Hz oscillation which is dominant in the remaining 10-20ps rms jitter between the transmitted
pulses and the RF reference generator.
10ps rms jitter is equivalent to phase jitter dphi = 2*pi*f0*dt = 2mrad rms @ 33MHz or 30mrad rms @ 500MHz. |
|
20Hz oscillation in the locking between Laser and FP-cavity, posted by Ronic Chiche at ThomX igloo about mechanics | lasers and optics | detectors and electronics
|
what does this 10ps phase jitter mean in term of cavity length variations ?
L = L0 + dL sin(2pi fm t) = L0 (1 + dL/L0 sin(2pi fm t))
F = c / L ~ F0 - F0² dL / c sin(2pi fm t) with F0 = c / L0 |
|
20Hz oscillation in the locking between Laser and FP-cavity, posted by Ronic Chiche at ThomX igloo about mechanics | lasers and optics | detectors and electronics
|
measure to be done next week to check the 20Hz noise on the laser amplifier signal:
- install a DET10 in reflection of the FP-cavity to get a high BW and measure the 500MHz harmonic.
- do the beating with the 500MHz Ring RF generator |
|
20Hz oscillation in the locking between Laser and FP-cavity, posted by Ronic Chiche at ThomX igloo about mechanics | lasers and optics | detectors and electronics
|
could it be possible this 20Hz oscillations comes from anouncements in the bunker, puting the housing+table in vibration ?
(there are such anouncements during restricted access) => to be asked to Harold
Ronic |
|
Optimizing lock parameters for stable X-ray production, posted by Ronic Chiche at ThomX igloo about lasers and optics | software
|
here are the (good) lock parameters used this morning.
for the RF/FPC lock, the 33MHz beating signal used to select the right bucket is 1Vpp
=> beating signal : V0 . sin(phi) with V0=0.5V. |
|
Optimizing lock parameters for stable X-ray production, posted by Ronic Chiche at ThomX igloo about lasers and optics | software
|
Today with Daniele and Alice, we operated to cavity.
we obtained 84kW for 33% of amplifier ratio.
we had to tune the CEP @ -565µm and the FP-cavity alignment. |
|
Characterizing Focus Tunable Lens, posted by Fatematuj Johora at Optical room about lasers and optics
|
Yesterday Ronic and I worked on the high laser power measurements with the Vertical set-up of the Focus Tunable Lens. We went upto 38W@4 dpt at the begining
and then also changed the focal power at 38W.
Observation: |
|
Optimizing lock parameters for stable X-ray production, posted by Ronic Chiche at ThomX igloo about lasers and optics | software
|
This morning, I wanted to test quickly if the Smaract motors can be used in open loop instead of closed loop or in piezo scan.
the goal is to do very fine steps without to much vibrations (like with piezo scan mode) but with the full motor range (the piezo scan mode
has a very limited range). |
|
Optimizing lock parameters for stable X-ray production, posted by Ronic Chiche at ThomX igloo about lasers and optics | software
|
This afternoon, we scanned the optical table vertically with the hexapod in asynchronous mode to find its optimum position, looking at the X-ray production.
then, we searched for the correct bucket and phase in the bucket thanks to the Kevin script on the 500MHz and the 33MHz phases.
we got relatively easily some stable X-rays. |
|
Optimizing lock parameters for stable X-ray production, posted by Ronic Chiche at ThomX igloo about lasers and optics | software
|
Today, after setting the locking parameters, I got 80kW in the FPC for 33% amplifier ratio after CEP tuning (Smaract CH2 ~ -423.5µm) and alignment.
maybe the alignment has to be improved by some walking procedure.
|
|
Optimizing lock parameters for stable X-ray production, posted by Ronic Chiche at ThomX igloo about lasers and optics | software
|
this morning, I did some walking procedure and I got 82kW in the FPC with 33% amplifier ratio (after CEP optimization too).
but when I move the FP cavity motors to adjust the frequency, I cannot keep this power and it is reduced.
could it be we get a stronger correlation between axis than before in the mechanics has more rust than before ? |
|
Optimizing lock parameters for stable X-ray production, posted by Ronic Chiche at ThomX igloo about lasers and optics | software
|
this morning, I did some walking procedure and CEP alignment to get ~80kW in the FPC with 33% amplifier ratio.
we have to check if this power drop comes from:
- a laser amplifier power drop |
|
Optimizing lock parameters for stable X-ray production, posted by Ronic Chiche at ThomX igloo about lasers and optics | software
|
the RF frequency is now 500.1003MHz which is equivalent (if divided by 15) to 33.34002MHz.
the frequency has to be changed by ~2kHz @33MHz <=> ~550µm /2 for one motor.
I changed the laser and the FP cavities frequency. |
|
day by day run for X-ray production, posted by Ronic Chiche at ThomX igloo about mechanics | lasers and optics | detectors and electronics
|
the RF frequency changed from 500.1003MHz to 500.0913MHz => it reduced by 9kHz @ 500MHz which is equivalent to 600Hz @ 33MHz (we measured 500Hz @
33MHz). the electron orbit length increased, so we have to increase the cavities length => increase motor values by ~ 68µm.
for the laser cavity : 1.496 560 mm => 1.564 560 mm |
|
day by day run for X-ray production, posted by Ronic Chiche at ThomX igloo about mechanics | lasers and optics | detectors and electronics
|
at the begining of the day, we started to get ~81kW in the FPC for 33% amplifier ratio and after ~1h, we got 84kW after CEP and alignment tuning.
at the end of the day, we got 89kW without walking alignment.
we tried to improve a bit the robustness of the FPC and RF locks: |
|
day by day run for X-ray production, posted by Ronic Chiche at ThomX igloo about mechanics | lasers and optics | detectors and electronics
|
today with Alice, we planned to do a long run with ~80kW in the FPC to check if the lock problems are coming from the interaction with the machine or
not.
the goal is to check this assumption on a full day comparable with a day of X-ray production. |
|
day by day run for X-ray production, posted by Ronic Chiche at ThomX igloo about mechanics | lasers and optics | detectors and electronics
|
we observed that :
- the MOT.03 motor always exhibits some perturbations on the transmitted, reflected and PZT signals (see "peaks" in the picture) in
contrary to the MOT.06 motor. |