HOME SBOX THOMX MINICAV Utilities
SBOX orders SBOX installation SBOX commissioning SBOX control command
  Status of commissioning, report also here plots are reports., Page 8 of 13  Not logged in ELOG logo
Entry   Images of ThomX mirrors , posted by Manar Amer at Optical room about lasers and optics ThomX_Spherical_Front_coating.jpgThomX_Spherical_2_Front_coating.jpgThomX_Spherical_back.jpg

Under the microscope,

the spherical mirrors show the deposit of metal dots on the reflecting surface and not on the back of the mirrors

The mirror with fewer spots near the center was used in the setup.

 

    Reply   Images of ThomX mirrors , posted by Manar Amer at Optical room about lasers and optics 

Mirror images in the previous log showing the metal deposit of the coating of the spherical mirrors

(not sent by mail due to large size of images)

Manar Amer wrote:

Under the microscope,

the spherical mirrors show the deposit of metal dots on the reflecting surface and not on the back of the mirrors

The mirror with fewer spots near the center was used in the setup.

 

 

    Reply   2 Mirror Setup @ 216.6 MHz, posted by Manar Amer at Optical room about lasers and optics | detectors and electronics 00mode.jpg00mode_diameter.jpgScreenshot_2022-07-08_0_164115.pngSlide1.JPGSlide2.JPG

The cavity was realigned using irises instead of pinholes, gave a better alignment.

The inside of the box, the spherical and the injection mirror were cleaned and placed back inside the box.

we see beating of fundamental mode, previously at the transmission point we placed a wedge to split the beam which resulted in an elliptical mode

we removed it and placed a very thin beam splitter, the beam is circular now.

The cavity was locked in air at a coupling of ~ 60-70 %

Finesse and line width measured five readings with a Finesse average 25095.08884  of a Gain ~ 8000

FWHM (KHz) = 8.2928
Finesse = 25323.0544

FWHM (KHz) = 7.9202
Finesse = 26514.4395

FWHM (KHz) = 8.5834
Finesse = 24465.8636

FWHM (KHz) = 8.4571
Finesse = 24831.2419

FWHM (KHz) = 8.6275
Finesse = 24340.8448

Theoretical and expected Finesse for the 2 mirror setup with the losses is calculated by Ronic for comparison between four and 2 mirror setup.

 

 

Manar Amer wrote:

The SBox cavity setup was changed to have only 2 mirrors M1 plane and M2 spherical, both from ThomX

Distance between the mirror ~ 72 cm , increased from 70 cm to take into account the thickness of the ThomX mirrors

Two lenses (300 mm @ 50 cm , 200 @ 104 cm) were placed to have the beam radius ~ 0.55 mm.

The cavity was locked with a coupling of 60 %, for Finesse measurement the sweep was taken over 100 KHz of 2 seconds.

FSR ~ 210.00 MHz, line width ~ 8.56 KHz, Finesse ~ 24 500 .

 

 

 

    Reply   2 Mirror Setup @ 216.6 MHz, posted by Manar Amer at Optical room about lasers and optics | detectors and electronics Screenshot_2022-07-08_2_182405.png

Update for Finesse measurement, The cavity was put under vacuum ~ 1.1*10^-1 mbar

and the alignment and coupling improved.

FSR = 210.1 MHz

Average Finesse = 25686.46222

 FWHM (KHz) = 8.2387
Finesse = 25501.5659

FWHM (KHz) = 8.2028
Finesse = 25613.2858

FWHM (KHz) = 8.0978
Finesse = 25945.3289

FWHM (KHz) = 8.1744
Finesse = 25702.3142

FWHM (KHz) = 8.1847
Finesse = 25669.8163

Concluded from Ronic's calculations, this could be the maximum finesse we might be able to obtain with this setup

with Gain ~ 8000

On Monday we adjust the frequency to match 2160.66 MHz and lock the Pulsed,

at the same time start we start with the CELIA amplifier.

 

 

 

Manar Amer wrote:

The cavity was realigned using irises instead of pinholes, gave a better alignment.

The inside of the box, the spherical and the injection mirror were cleaned and placed back inside the box.

we see beating of fundamental mode, previously at the transmission point we placed a wedge to split the beam which resulted in an elliptical mode

we removed it and placed a very thin beam splitter, the beam is circular now.

The cavity was locked in air at a coupling of ~ 60-70 %

Finesse and line width measured five readings with a Finesse average 25095.08884  of a Gain ~ 8000

FWHM (KHz) = 8.2928
Finesse = 25323.0544

FWHM (KHz) = 7.9202
Finesse = 26514.4395

FWHM (KHz) = 8.5834
Finesse = 24465.8636

FWHM (KHz) = 8.4571
Finesse = 24831.2419

FWHM (KHz) = 8.6275
Finesse = 24340.8448

Theoretical and expected Finesse for the 2 mirror setup with the losses is calculated by Ronic for comparison between four and 2 mirror setup.

 

 

Manar Amer wrote:

The SBox cavity setup was changed to have only 2 mirrors M1 plane and M2 spherical, both from ThomX

Distance between the mirror ~ 72 cm , increased from 70 cm to take into account the thickness of the ThomX mirrors

Two lenses (300 mm @ 50 cm , 200 @ 104 cm) were placed to have the beam radius ~ 0.55 mm.

The cavity was locked with a coupling of 60 %, for Finesse measurement the sweep was taken over 100 KHz of 2 seconds.

FSR ~ 210.00 MHz, line width ~ 8.56 KHz, Finesse ~ 24 500 .

 

 

 

 

    Reply   FSR change & Finesse Measurements , posted by Manar Amer at Optical room about lasers and optics | detectors and electronics 00mode.jpg00mode_diameter.jpg00mode_diameter_fit.jpg

The FSR of the 2 mirror (plan-spherical) Cavity was adjusted from 210 MHz to reach 216.643 MHz

it was done by having two reference irises, one at the injection point and one at the reflection 

then changing the position of injection plan mirror to slightly closer distance and monitoring the reflection on the oscilloscope to be max.

The cavity modes were still seen, and we had to only improve the injection alignment after.

Me and Ronic locked in air and measured the Finesse, which was bigger by ~ 20%

average Finesse = 30208.53614

FWHM (KHz) = 7.0179
Finesse = 30869.9522

FWHM (KHz) = 7.1257
Finesse = 30403.005

FWHM (KHz) = 7.1287
Finesse = 30390.4014

FWHM (KHz) = 7.2884
Finesse = 29724.5531

FWHM (KHz) = 7.3055
Finesse = 29654.769

 

 

Manar Amer wrote:

Update for Finesse measurement, The cavity was put under vacuum ~ 1.1*10^-1 mbar

and the alignment and coupling improved.

FSR = 210.1 MHz

Average Finesse = 25686.46222

 FWHM (KHz) = 8.2387
Finesse = 25501.5659

FWHM (KHz) = 8.2028
Finesse = 25613.2858

FWHM (KHz) = 8.0978
Finesse = 25945.3289

FWHM (KHz) = 8.1744
Finesse = 25702.3142

FWHM (KHz) = 8.1847
Finesse = 25669.8163

Concluded from Ronic's calculations, this could be the maximum finesse we might be able to obtain with this setup

with Gain ~ 8000

On Monday we adjust the frequency to match 2160.66 MHz and lock the Pulsed,

at the same time start we start with the CELIA amplifier.

 

 

 

Manar Amer wrote:

The cavity was realigned using irises instead of pinholes, gave a better alignment.

The inside of the box, the spherical and the injection mirror were cleaned and placed back inside the box.

we see beating of fundamental mode, previously at the transmission point we placed a wedge to split the beam which resulted in an elliptical mode

we removed it and placed a very thin beam splitter, the beam is circular now.

The cavity was locked in air at a coupling of ~ 60-70 %

Finesse and line width measured five readings with a Finesse average 25095.08884  of a Gain ~ 8000

FWHM (KHz) = 8.2928
Finesse = 25323.0544

FWHM (KHz) = 7.9202
Finesse = 26514.4395

FWHM (KHz) = 8.5834
Finesse = 24465.8636

FWHM (KHz) = 8.4571
Finesse = 24831.2419

FWHM (KHz) = 8.6275
Finesse = 24340.8448

Theoretical and expected Finesse for the 2 mirror setup with the losses is calculated by Ronic for comparison between four and 2 mirror setup.

 

 

Manar Amer wrote:

The SBox cavity setup was changed to have only 2 mirrors M1 plane and M2 spherical, both from ThomX

Distance between the mirror ~ 72 cm , increased from 70 cm to take into account the thickness of the ThomX mirrors

Two lenses (300 mm @ 50 cm , 200 @ 104 cm) were placed to have the beam radius ~ 0.55 mm.

The cavity was locked with a coupling of 60 %, for Finesse measurement the sweep was taken over 100 KHz of 2 seconds.

FSR ~ 210.00 MHz, line width ~ 8.56 KHz, Finesse ~ 24 500 .

 

 

 

 

 

    Reply   FSR change & Finesse Measurements , posted by Manar Amer at Optical room about lasers and optics | detectors and electronics Screenshot_2022-07-11_1_204143.pngScreenshot_2022-07-11_0_203646.png

Yesterday evening the cavity was Vacuum pumped up to pressure of 5.5*10^-2 and locked 

changed FSR to be 216.662 MHz and alignment a little and measured the Finesse

in Vacuum we have average Finesse = 30341.6265

FWHM (KHz) = 7.0592
Finesse = 30692.1961

FWHM (KHz) = 7.2186
Finesse = 30014.556

FWHM (KHz) = 7.1051
Finesse = 30493.7635

FWHM (KHz) = 7.1079
Finesse = 30481.9812

FWHM (KHz) = 7.1413
Finesse = 30339.2695

FWHM (KHz) = 7.1624
Finesse = 30249.776

FWHM (KHz) = 7.0239
Finesse = 30846.2719

FWHM (KHz) = 7.2614
Finesse = 29837.6477

FWHM (KHz) = 7.1935
Finesse = 30119.1768

 

Manar Amer wrote:

The FSR of the 2 mirror (plan-spherical) Cavity was adjusted from 210 MHz to reach 216.643 MHz

it was done by having two reference irises, one at the injection point and one at the reflection 

then changing the position of injection plan mirror to slightly closer distance and monitoring the reflection on the oscilloscope to be max.

The cavity modes were still seen, and we had to only improve the injection alignment after.

Me and Ronic locked in air and measured the Finesse, which was bigger by ~ 20%

average Finesse = 30208.53614

FWHM (KHz) = 7.0179
Finesse = 30869.9522

FWHM (KHz) = 7.1257
Finesse = 30403.005

FWHM (KHz) = 7.1287
Finesse = 30390.4014

FWHM (KHz) = 7.2884
Finesse = 29724.5531

FWHM (KHz) = 7.3055
Finesse = 29654.769

 

 

Manar Amer wrote:

Update for Finesse measurement, The cavity was put under vacuum ~ 1.1*10^-1 mbar

and the alignment and coupling improved.

FSR = 210.1 MHz

Average Finesse = 25686.46222

 FWHM (KHz) = 8.2387
Finesse = 25501.5659

FWHM (KHz) = 8.2028
Finesse = 25613.2858

FWHM (KHz) = 8.0978
Finesse = 25945.3289

FWHM (KHz) = 8.1744
Finesse = 25702.3142

FWHM (KHz) = 8.1847
Finesse = 25669.8163

Concluded from Ronic's calculations, this could be the maximum finesse we might be able to obtain with this setup

with Gain ~ 8000

On Monday we adjust the frequency to match 2160.66 MHz and lock the Pulsed,

at the same time start we start with the CELIA amplifier.

 

 

 

Manar Amer wrote:

The cavity was realigned using irises instead of pinholes, gave a better alignment.

The inside of the box, the spherical and the injection mirror were cleaned and placed back inside the box.

we see beating of fundamental mode, previously at the transmission point we placed a wedge to split the beam which resulted in an elliptical mode

we removed it and placed a very thin beam splitter, the beam is circular now.

The cavity was locked in air at a coupling of ~ 60-70 %

Finesse and line width measured five readings with a Finesse average 25095.08884  of a Gain ~ 8000

FWHM (KHz) = 8.2928
Finesse = 25323.0544

FWHM (KHz) = 7.9202
Finesse = 26514.4395

FWHM (KHz) = 8.5834
Finesse = 24465.8636

FWHM (KHz) = 8.4571
Finesse = 24831.2419

FWHM (KHz) = 8.6275
Finesse = 24340.8448

Theoretical and expected Finesse for the 2 mirror setup with the losses is calculated by Ronic for comparison between four and 2 mirror setup.

 

 

Manar Amer wrote:

The SBox cavity setup was changed to have only 2 mirrors M1 plane and M2 spherical, both from ThomX

Distance between the mirror ~ 72 cm , increased from 70 cm to take into account the thickness of the ThomX mirrors

Two lenses (300 mm @ 50 cm , 200 @ 104 cm) were placed to have the beam radius ~ 0.55 mm.

The cavity was locked with a coupling of 60 %, for Finesse measurement the sweep was taken over 100 KHz of 2 seconds.

FSR ~ 210.00 MHz, line width ~ 8.56 KHz, Finesse ~ 24 500 .

 

 

 

 

 

 

    Reply   FSR change & Finesse Measurements , posted by Manar Amer at Optical room about lasers and optics | detectors and electronics 

a Finesse of 30k with the present mirrors :

T1=120 ppm ;A1=(2.6+1) ppm;
T2=1.5 ppm ;A2=(4.5+0.27) ppm;

corresponds to 39 ppm of additional losses for each mirror and a theoretical gain of about 11k.

Manar Amer wrote:

Yesterday evening the cavity was Vacuum pumped up to pressure of 5.5*10^-2 and locked 

changed FSR to be 216.662 MHz and alignment a little and measured the Finesse

in Vacuum we have average Finesse = 30341.6265

FWHM (KHz) = 7.0592
Finesse = 30692.1961

FWHM (KHz) = 7.2186
Finesse = 30014.556

FWHM (KHz) = 7.1051
Finesse = 30493.7635

FWHM (KHz) = 7.1079
Finesse = 30481.9812

FWHM (KHz) = 7.1413
Finesse = 30339.2695

FWHM (KHz) = 7.1624
Finesse = 30249.776

FWHM (KHz) = 7.0239
Finesse = 30846.2719

FWHM (KHz) = 7.2614
Finesse = 29837.6477

FWHM (KHz) = 7.1935
Finesse = 30119.1768

 

Manar Amer wrote:

The FSR of the 2 mirror (plan-spherical) Cavity was adjusted from 210 MHz to reach 216.643 MHz

it was done by having two reference irises, one at the injection point and one at the reflection 

then changing the position of injection plan mirror to slightly closer distance and monitoring the reflection on the oscilloscope to be max.

The cavity modes were still seen, and we had to only improve the injection alignment after.

Me and Ronic locked in air and measured the Finesse, which was bigger by ~ 20%

average Finesse = 30208.53614

FWHM (KHz) = 7.0179
Finesse = 30869.9522

FWHM (KHz) = 7.1257
Finesse = 30403.005

FWHM (KHz) = 7.1287
Finesse = 30390.4014

FWHM (KHz) = 7.2884
Finesse = 29724.5531

FWHM (KHz) = 7.3055
Finesse = 29654.769

 

 

Manar Amer wrote:

Update for Finesse measurement, The cavity was put under vacuum ~ 1.1*10^-1 mbar

and the alignment and coupling improved.

FSR = 210.1 MHz

Average Finesse = 25686.46222

 FWHM (KHz) = 8.2387
Finesse = 25501.5659

FWHM (KHz) = 8.2028
Finesse = 25613.2858

FWHM (KHz) = 8.0978
Finesse = 25945.3289

FWHM (KHz) = 8.1744
Finesse = 25702.3142

FWHM (KHz) = 8.1847
Finesse = 25669.8163

Concluded from Ronic's calculations, this could be the maximum finesse we might be able to obtain with this setup

with Gain ~ 8000

On Monday we adjust the frequency to match 2160.66 MHz and lock the Pulsed,

at the same time start we start with the CELIA amplifier.

 

 

 

Manar Amer wrote:

The cavity was realigned using irises instead of pinholes, gave a better alignment.

The inside of the box, the spherical and the injection mirror were cleaned and placed back inside the box.

we see beating of fundamental mode, previously at the transmission point we placed a wedge to split the beam which resulted in an elliptical mode

we removed it and placed a very thin beam splitter, the beam is circular now.

The cavity was locked in air at a coupling of ~ 60-70 %

Finesse and line width measured five readings with a Finesse average 25095.08884  of a Gain ~ 8000

FWHM (KHz) = 8.2928
Finesse = 25323.0544

FWHM (KHz) = 7.9202
Finesse = 26514.4395

FWHM (KHz) = 8.5834
Finesse = 24465.8636

FWHM (KHz) = 8.4571
Finesse = 24831.2419

FWHM (KHz) = 8.6275
Finesse = 24340.8448

Theoretical and expected Finesse for the 2 mirror setup with the losses is calculated by Ronic for comparison between four and 2 mirror setup.

 

 

Manar Amer wrote:

The SBox cavity setup was changed to have only 2 mirrors M1 plane and M2 spherical, both from ThomX

Distance between the mirror ~ 72 cm , increased from 70 cm to take into account the thickness of the ThomX mirrors

Two lenses (300 mm @ 50 cm , 200 @ 104 cm) were placed to have the beam radius ~ 0.55 mm.

The cavity was locked with a coupling of 60 %, for Finesse measurement the sweep was taken over 100 KHz of 2 seconds.

FSR ~ 210.00 MHz, line width ~ 8.56 KHz, Finesse ~ 24 500 .

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

    Reply   Installation of D-shaped mirror / Alignment, posted by Manar Amer at Optical room about lasers and optics | detectors and electronics 

To prepare for the amplifier. I installed the D-shapped mirrors after cleaning (using aceton and ethanol) between the cavity 2 mirrors.

Before closing, I observed the back reflection from M1 (injection mirror). both the injection and reflection lines were off, due to that there was an internal reflection hitting the walls of the cavity.

I tried to correct it by slightly adjusting on M1 without losing the mode, but unfortunately we lost it. 

Tried to go back to the original position using the reflection iris reference, with no success.

Cavity axis is lost, and we need to align again.

 

Manar Amer wrote:

a Finesse of 30k with the present mirrors :

T1=120 ppm ;A1=(2.6+1) ppm;
T2=1.5 ppm ;A2=(4.5+0.27) ppm;

corresponds to 39 ppm of additional losses for each mirror and a theoretical gain of about 11k.

Manar Amer wrote:

Yesterday evening the cavity was Vacuum pumped up to pressure of 5.5*10^-2 and locked 

changed FSR to be 216.662 MHz and alignment a little and measured the Finesse

in Vacuum we have average Finesse = 30341.6265

FWHM (KHz) = 7.0592
Finesse = 30692.1961

FWHM (KHz) = 7.2186
Finesse = 30014.556

FWHM (KHz) = 7.1051
Finesse = 30493.7635

FWHM (KHz) = 7.1079
Finesse = 30481.9812

FWHM (KHz) = 7.1413
Finesse = 30339.2695

FWHM (KHz) = 7.1624
Finesse = 30249.776

FWHM (KHz) = 7.0239
Finesse = 30846.2719

FWHM (KHz) = 7.2614
Finesse = 29837.6477

FWHM (KHz) = 7.1935
Finesse = 30119.1768

 

Manar Amer wrote:

The FSR of the 2 mirror (plan-spherical) Cavity was adjusted from 210 MHz to reach 216.643 MHz

it was done by having two reference irises, one at the injection point and one at the reflection 

then changing the position of injection plan mirror to slightly closer distance and monitoring the reflection on the oscilloscope to be max.

The cavity modes were still seen, and we had to only improve the injection alignment after.

Me and Ronic locked in air and measured the Finesse, which was bigger by ~ 20%

average Finesse = 30208.53614

FWHM (KHz) = 7.0179
Finesse = 30869.9522

FWHM (KHz) = 7.1257
Finesse = 30403.005

FWHM (KHz) = 7.1287
Finesse = 30390.4014

FWHM (KHz) = 7.2884
Finesse = 29724.5531

FWHM (KHz) = 7.3055
Finesse = 29654.769

 

 

Manar Amer wrote:

Update for Finesse measurement, The cavity was put under vacuum ~ 1.1*10^-1 mbar

and the alignment and coupling improved.

FSR = 210.1 MHz

Average Finesse = 25686.46222

 FWHM (KHz) = 8.2387
Finesse = 25501.5659

FWHM (KHz) = 8.2028
Finesse = 25613.2858

FWHM (KHz) = 8.0978
Finesse = 25945.3289

FWHM (KHz) = 8.1744
Finesse = 25702.3142

FWHM (KHz) = 8.1847
Finesse = 25669.8163

Concluded from Ronic's calculations, this could be the maximum finesse we might be able to obtain with this setup

with Gain ~ 8000

On Monday we adjust the frequency to match 2160.66 MHz and lock the Pulsed,

at the same time start we start with the CELIA amplifier.

 

 

 

Manar Amer wrote:

The cavity was realigned using irises instead of pinholes, gave a better alignment.

The inside of the box, the spherical and the injection mirror were cleaned and placed back inside the box.

we see beating of fundamental mode, previously at the transmission point we placed a wedge to split the beam which resulted in an elliptical mode

we removed it and placed a very thin beam splitter, the beam is circular now.

The cavity was locked in air at a coupling of ~ 60-70 %

Finesse and line width measured five readings with a Finesse average 25095.08884  of a Gain ~ 8000

FWHM (KHz) = 8.2928
Finesse = 25323.0544

FWHM (KHz) = 7.9202
Finesse = 26514.4395

FWHM (KHz) = 8.5834
Finesse = 24465.8636

FWHM (KHz) = 8.4571
Finesse = 24831.2419

FWHM (KHz) = 8.6275
Finesse = 24340.8448

Theoretical and expected Finesse for the 2 mirror setup with the losses is calculated by Ronic for comparison between four and 2 mirror setup.

 

 

Manar Amer wrote:

The SBox cavity setup was changed to have only 2 mirrors M1 plane and M2 spherical, both from ThomX

Distance between the mirror ~ 72 cm , increased from 70 cm to take into account the thickness of the ThomX mirrors

Two lenses (300 mm @ 50 cm , 200 @ 104 cm) were placed to have the beam radius ~ 0.55 mm.

The cavity was locked with a coupling of 60 %, for Finesse measurement the sweep was taken over 100 KHz of 2 seconds.

FSR ~ 210.00 MHz, line width ~ 8.56 KHz, Finesse ~ 24 500 .

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Entry   CELIA amplifier installation, posted by Manar Amer at Optical room about lasers and optics | detectors and electronics | software 

The amplifier was installed on the optical table next to SBox table.

The CVBG that will be used for stretching before amplification needs cleaning (they are very fragile, 'ask victor for best method')

The software to drive the diodes of the amplifier we have is not the compatible one.

    Reply   CELIA amplifier installation + chiller, posted by Manar Amer at Optical room about lasers and optics | detectors and electronics | software WhatsApp_Image_2022-07-22_at_4.26.24_PM.jpgWhatsApp_Image_2022-07-22_at_4.26.24_PM.jpgWhatsApp_Image_2022-07-22_at_5.02.24_PM.jpg

Amplifier placed next to the pulsed laser on the table under the airflow

The output is in free space with height from the table of about 10 cm, note the injection height into the cavity is between 14 - 15 cm.

a power cable is placed but not plugged.

Connection to the computer is made using USB B on amplifier to USB A  (note need a longer cable, the available on is too short)

The cooling, to be connected to an outside chiller, will use the bottom one shown in the image attached.

The two water tubes, from chiller to amplifier,  has been marked. The size of the tubes from the amplifier fit inside the tubes from the chiller.

 

 

Manar Amer wrote:

The amplifier was installed on the optical table next to SBox table.

The CVBG that will be used for stretching before amplification needs cleaning (they are very fragile, 'ask victor for best method')

The software to drive the diodes of the amplifier we have is not the compatible one.

 

    Reply   Installation of D-shaped mirror / Alignment, posted by Manar Amer at Optical room about lasers and optics | detectors and electronics 

The D-shaped mirrors are installed properly and not cutting the path of the beam.

The cavity has been aligned again and 00 modes beating observed, and external reference points has been placed.

Manar Amer wrote:

To prepare for the amplifier. I installed the D-shapped mirrors after cleaning (using aceton and ethanol) between the cavity 2 mirrors.

Before closing, I observed the back reflection from M1 (injection mirror). both the injection and reflection lines were off, due to that there was an internal reflection hitting the walls of the cavity.

I tried to correct it by slightly adjusting on M1 without losing the mode, but unfortunately we lost it. 

Tried to go back to the original position using the reflection iris reference, with no success.

Cavity axis is lost, and we need to align again.

 

Manar Amer wrote:

a Finesse of 30k with the present mirrors :

T1=120 ppm ;A1=(2.6+1) ppm;
T2=1.5 ppm ;A2=(4.5+0.27) ppm;

corresponds to 39 ppm of additional losses for each mirror and a theoretical gain of about 11k.

Manar Amer wrote:

Yesterday evening the cavity was Vacuum pumped up to pressure of 5.5*10^-2 and locked 

changed FSR to be 216.662 MHz and alignment a little and measured the Finesse

in Vacuum we have average Finesse = 30341.6265

FWHM (KHz) = 7.0592
Finesse = 30692.1961

FWHM (KHz) = 7.2186
Finesse = 30014.556

FWHM (KHz) = 7.1051
Finesse = 30493.7635

FWHM (KHz) = 7.1079
Finesse = 30481.9812

FWHM (KHz) = 7.1413
Finesse = 30339.2695

FWHM (KHz) = 7.1624
Finesse = 30249.776

FWHM (KHz) = 7.0239
Finesse = 30846.2719

FWHM (KHz) = 7.2614
Finesse = 29837.6477

FWHM (KHz) = 7.1935
Finesse = 30119.1768

 

Manar Amer wrote:

The FSR of the 2 mirror (plan-spherical) Cavity was adjusted from 210 MHz to reach 216.643 MHz

it was done by having two reference irises, one at the injection point and one at the reflection 

then changing the position of injection plan mirror to slightly closer distance and monitoring the reflection on the oscilloscope to be max.

The cavity modes were still seen, and we had to only improve the injection alignment after.

Me and Ronic locked in air and measured the Finesse, which was bigger by ~ 20%

average Finesse = 30208.53614

FWHM (KHz) = 7.0179
Finesse = 30869.9522

FWHM (KHz) = 7.1257
Finesse = 30403.005

FWHM (KHz) = 7.1287
Finesse = 30390.4014

FWHM (KHz) = 7.2884
Finesse = 29724.5531

FWHM (KHz) = 7.3055
Finesse = 29654.769

 

 

Manar Amer wrote:

Update for Finesse measurement, The cavity was put under vacuum ~ 1.1*10^-1 mbar

and the alignment and coupling improved.

FSR = 210.1 MHz

Average Finesse = 25686.46222

 FWHM (KHz) = 8.2387
Finesse = 25501.5659

FWHM (KHz) = 8.2028
Finesse = 25613.2858

FWHM (KHz) = 8.0978
Finesse = 25945.3289

FWHM (KHz) = 8.1744
Finesse = 25702.3142

FWHM (KHz) = 8.1847
Finesse = 25669.8163

Concluded from Ronic's calculations, this could be the maximum finesse we might be able to obtain with this setup

with Gain ~ 8000

On Monday we adjust the frequency to match 2160.66 MHz and lock the Pulsed,

at the same time start we start with the CELIA amplifier.

 

 

 

Manar Amer wrote:

The cavity was realigned using irises instead of pinholes, gave a better alignment.

The inside of the box, the spherical and the injection mirror were cleaned and placed back inside the box.

we see beating of fundamental mode, previously at the transmission point we placed a wedge to split the beam which resulted in an elliptical mode

we removed it and placed a very thin beam splitter, the beam is circular now.

The cavity was locked in air at a coupling of ~ 60-70 %

Finesse and line width measured five readings with a Finesse average 25095.08884  of a Gain ~ 8000

FWHM (KHz) = 8.2928
Finesse = 25323.0544

FWHM (KHz) = 7.9202
Finesse = 26514.4395

FWHM (KHz) = 8.5834
Finesse = 24465.8636

FWHM (KHz) = 8.4571
Finesse = 24831.2419

FWHM (KHz) = 8.6275
Finesse = 24340.8448

Theoretical and expected Finesse for the 2 mirror setup with the losses is calculated by Ronic for comparison between four and 2 mirror setup.

 

 

Manar Amer wrote:

The SBox cavity setup was changed to have only 2 mirrors M1 plane and M2 spherical, both from ThomX

Distance between the mirror ~ 72 cm , increased from 70 cm to take into account the thickness of the ThomX mirrors

Two lenses (300 mm @ 50 cm , 200 @ 104 cm) were placed to have the beam radius ~ 0.55 mm.

The cavity was locked with a coupling of 60 %, for Finesse measurement the sweep was taken over 100 KHz of 2 seconds.

FSR ~ 210.00 MHz, line width ~ 8.56 KHz, Finesse ~ 24 500 .

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Entry   Alignment / Table setup , posted by Manar Amer at Optical room about lasers and optics | detectors and electronics | software 20220722_table_setup.jpg20220722_tablesetup.jpg

The current setup of the optical table attached.

The cavity is aligned and the lock of the fundamental mode has been attempted, but the mode is drifting too quickly to be able to follow.

I have placed the cavity under vacuum for a better stability.

a simple telescope for the CW was adjusted to having 2 lenses of 300 mm placed ~ 250 mm away from the colimator and 200 mm lens placed after it with 510 mm.

 

Entry   CVBG stretching / Fiber Injection , posted by Manar Amer at Optical room about lasers and optics | detectors and electronics | software 7x

Before injecting into the amplifier, the pulse needs to be stretched using a CVBG, type attached.

the CVBG is to be used at a small angle, the beam shape and spectrum after the PBS is attached.

After measuring the beam profile, a mirror was placed to direct all the power for fiber injection

power before the fiber is 13 mW and the power injected is 6.19 mW

 

    Reply   CELIA amplifier installation + chiller, posted by Manar Amer at Optical room about lasers and optics | detectors and electronics | software 

The software to control the CELIA amplifier is on the laptop that was placed in ThomX bunker.

I have placed it in the PLIC room next to the SBox table.

it is called 'Alphanov Control Software'

 

Manar Amer wrote:

Amplifier placed next to the pulsed laser on the table under the airflow

The output is in free space with height from the table of about 10 cm, note the injection height into the cavity is between 14 - 15 cm.

a power cable is placed but not plugged.

Connection to the computer is made using USB B on amplifier to USB A  (note need a longer cable, the available on is too short)

The cooling, to be connected to an outside chiller, will use the bottom one shown in the image attached.

The two water tubes, from chiller to amplifier,  has been marked. The size of the tubes from the amplifier fit inside the tubes from the chiller.

 

 

Manar Amer wrote:

The amplifier was installed on the optical table next to SBox table.

The CVBG that will be used for stretching before amplification needs cleaning (they are very fragile, 'ask victor for best method')

The software to drive the diodes of the amplifier we have is not the compatible one.

 

 

    Reply   CELIA amplifier installation + chiller, posted by Manar Amer at Optical room about lasers and optics | detectors and electronics | software 

Closing series

Manar Amer wrote:

The software to control the CELIA amplifier is on the laptop that was placed in ThomX bunker.

I have placed it in the PLIC room next to the SBox table.

it is called 'Alphanov Control Software'

 

Manar Amer wrote:

Amplifier placed next to the pulsed laser on the table under the airflow

The output is in free space with height from the table of about 10 cm, note the injection height into the cavity is between 14 - 15 cm.

a power cable is placed but not plugged.

Connection to the computer is made using USB B on amplifier to USB A  (note need a longer cable, the available on is too short)

The cooling, to be connected to an outside chiller, will use the bottom one shown in the image attached.

The two water tubes, from chiller to amplifier,  has been marked. The size of the tubes from the amplifier fit inside the tubes from the chiller.

 

 

Manar Amer wrote:

The amplifier was installed on the optical table next to SBox table.

The CVBG that will be used for stretching before amplification needs cleaning (they are very fragile, 'ask victor for best method')

The software to drive the diodes of the amplifier we have is not the compatible one.

 

 

 

    Reply   Alignment / Table setup , posted by Manar Amer at Optical room about lasers and optics | detectors and electronics | software 

closing series

Manar Amer wrote:

The current setup of the optical table attached.

The cavity is aligned and the lock of the fundamental mode has been attempted, but the mode is drifting too quickly to be able to follow.

I have placed the cavity under vacuum for a better stability.

a simple telescope for the CW was adjusted to having 2 lenses of 300 mm placed ~ 250 mm away from the colimator and 200 mm lens placed after it with 510 mm.

 

 

    Reply   CVBG stretching / Fiber Injection , posted by Manar Amer at Optical room about lasers and optics | detectors and electronics | software 

closing series

Manar Amer wrote:

Before injecting into the amplifier, the pulse needs to be stretched using a CVBG, type attached.

the CVBG is to be used at a small angle, the beam shape and spectrum after the PBS is attached.

After measuring the beam profile, a mirror was placed to direct all the power for fiber injection

power before the fiber is 13 mW and the power injected is 6.19 mW

 

 

Entry   Amplifier output Beam Profile, posted by Manar Amer at Optical room about lasers and optics 20220819_Setup.jpg

In preparation to measure the output beam profile from the amplifier at high power, I have placed two wedge mirrors just before the beam dump to be able to extract the beam.

One of the wedges was taken from ThomX bunker, also the HR and AR mirrors were taken to plic room in case we might need them

an updated setup is attached  

Entry   Telescope / amplifier output, posted by Manar Amer at Optical room about lasers and optics 

The previous Sbox telescope was dismantled and the mechanical components cleaned.

its lenses are still in the mounts, it looks that two of them are spherical and two are cylindrical

2 are -100 mm and 2 are +150 mm, there is also a box containing fused silica lenses that could be used.

Note: at high power use only fused silica lenses not BK7 type

 

 

    Reply   Telescope / amplifier output, posted by Manar Amer at Optical room about lasers and optics Focal_length_divergence_method.pdfBeam_Profile_at_high_power_.jpgSBOX_CELIA_AMPLIFIER_Divergence_measurement.pdf

Beam divergence was measured using a method called  "Focal Length Divergence Measurement Method"

Where a lens of a known focal length is placed on the beam path and the beam waist is measured at the focal distance using a beam profiler.

We ramped the power up to 10 W

for a focal length = 400 mm,

we measured a FWHM = 2.1 mm,

corresponding to a divergence = 4.45 mrad  (edit : wrong software use)

for comparison, we measured the FWHM 8.1 mm  @ 1.55 m and extracted the divergence directly 4.46 mrad  (edit : this measurement is wrong - wrong use of the software)

Note: better to use a lens of a focal lens higher than 100 mm (to reduce the error in the distance measured)

 

 

 

Manar Amer wrote:

The previous Sbox telescope was dismantled and the mechanical components cleaned.

its lenses are still in the mounts, it looks that two of them are spherical and two are cylindrical

2 are -100 mm and 2 are +150 mm, there is also a box containing fused silica lenses that could be used.

Note: at high power use only fused silica lenses not BK7 type

 

 

 

ELOG V3.1.4-395e101