On aligne dans QP1 et QP3 et on regarde pour une variation de +- 1A la derive sur TL/BPM.01

valeur nominal QP1-QP3 (0.1A, 3.4A, -3.4A)

autour de QP1-QP3 à 0 pour l'alignement :

     * valeur nominal BPM initale (0.3mm, -0.3mm)

     * QP3 +1A : (0.3mm, -0.1mm)

     * QP3 -1A : (0.5mm, 0mm)

     * QP1 +1A : (0.4mm, -0.1mm)

     * QP1 -1A : (0.3mm, -0.2mm)

     * valeur nominal BPM finale (0.3mm, -0.2mm)

autour de QP1-QP3 à aux valeurs nominales pour l'alignement :

     * valeur nominal BPM initale (0.4mm, 0mm)

     * QP3 +1A : (0.3mm, 0mm)

     * QP3 -1A : (0.4mm, 0mm)

     * QP1 +1A : (0.4mm, 0.mm)

     * QP1 -1A : (0.3mm, -0.1mm)

     * valeur nominal BPM finale (0.3mm, -0.1mm)

*** We go to the ring ***

No Steerer and we can transport to the ring. Alignement used : QP1-QP3 @nominale current

==> no  loss of charge. 

==> good beam on last screen

==> I suggest to used this alignement : saved in recipe "all_20241025_19_18_14"

==> with steering impossible to enter in the ring when at 0 on TL/BPM.03 and TL/BPM.04 (on axis beam). Why ? Ring configuration ? Kick from Ring magnets or EP ? Especially in vertical.

==> by setting the nominal current on the steererqs (of TL) we can inject in the ring. The 2 alignement of QP1 - QP3 seems to be close enougth.

*** Scan coil Vs beam dim at TL/SST1

==> see figure and data

20h40: stop machine