20Hz oscillation in the locking between Laser and FP-cavity, posted by Ronic Chiche at ThomX igloo about mechanics | lasers and optics | detectors and electronics
|
what does this 10ps phase jitter mean in term of cavity length variations ?
L = L0 + dL sin(2pi fm t) = L0 (1 + dL/L0 sin(2pi fm t))
F = c / L ~ F0 - F0² dL / c sin(2pi fm t) with F0 = c / L0 |
|
20Hz oscillation in the locking between Laser and FP-cavity, posted by Ronic Chiche at ThomX igloo about mechanics | lasers and optics | detectors and electronics
|
measure to be done next week to check the 20Hz noise on the laser amplifier signal:
- install a DET10 in reflection of the FP-cavity to get a high BW and measure the 500MHz harmonic.
- do the beating with the 500MHz Ring RF generator |
|
20Hz oscillation in the locking between Laser and FP-cavity, posted by Ronic Chiche at ThomX igloo about mechanics | lasers and optics | detectors and electronics
|
could it be possible this 20Hz oscillations comes from anouncements in the bunker, puting the housing+table in vibration ?
(there are such anouncements during restricted access) => to be asked to Harold
Ronic |
day by day run for X-ray production, posted by Ronic Chiche at ThomX igloo about mechanics | lasers and optics | detectors and electronics
|
the RF frequency changed from 500.1003MHz to 500.0913MHz => it reduced by 9kHz @ 500MHz which is equivalent to 600Hz @ 33MHz (we measured 500Hz @
33MHz). the electron orbit length increased, so we have to increase the cavities length => increase motor values by ~ 68µm.
for the laser cavity : 1.496 560 mm => 1.564 560 mm |
day by day run for X-ray production, posted by Ronic Chiche at ThomX igloo about mechanics | lasers and optics | detectors and electronics 
|
at the begining of the day, we started to get ~81kW in the FPC for 33% amplifier ratio and after ~1h, we got 84kW after CEP and alignment tuning.
at the end of the day, we got 89kW without walking alignment.
we tried to improve a bit the robustness of the FPC and RF locks: |
|
day by day run for X-ray production, posted by Ronic Chiche at ThomX igloo about mechanics | lasers and optics | detectors and electronics
|
today with Alice, we planned to do a long run with ~80kW in the FPC to check if the lock problems are coming from the interaction with the machine or
not.
the goal is to check this assumption on a full day comparable with a day of X-ray production. |
|
day by day run for X-ray production, posted by Ronic Chiche at ThomX igloo about mechanics | lasers and optics | detectors and electronics
|
we observed that :
- the MOT.03 motor always exhibits some perturbations on the transmitted, reflected and PZT signals (see "peaks" in the picture) in
contrary to the MOT.06 motor. |
|
day by day run for X-ray production, posted by Ronic Chiche at ThomX igloo about mechanics | lasers and optics | detectors and electronics
|
last thing we tried :
we removed the threshold on the FPC/RF error signal.
=> we cannot choose automatically the RF bucket anymore (we need to manually let the phase drift slowly and start the lock at the right moment). |
|
day by day run for X-ray production, posted by Ronic Chiche at ThomX igloo about mechanics | lasers and optics | detectors and electronics
|
This morning, I added an amplifier on the 33MHz beating signal in between the mixer+LPF and the scope/Laselock.
it seems to improve the robustness of the RF/FPC lock.
because of this gain, I increased the upper and lower thresholds on the search criterion of the RF/FPC lock from +/-50mV to +250mV/-200mV |
|
day by day run for X-ray production, posted by Ronic Chiche at ThomX igloo about mechanics | lasers and optics | detectors and electronics
|
major result of the day: X-ray vertical scan by moving the hexapod
abscise : hexapod position
ordinate : xray flux in asynchronous condition |
|
day by day run for X-ray production, posted by Ronic Chiche at ThomX igloo about mechanics | lasers and optics | detectors and electronics
|
this morning, Kevin reduced the steering current in the IcePap controllers of the FP cavity motors.
the motor MOT.06 was producing a pattern in the Transmission signal when it was moved and doing a lock loss very often.
so, we changed its current from 0.8A to 0.4A and it fixes the problem => no more systematic lock loss. |
|
day by day run for X-ray production, posted by Ronic Chiche at ThomX igloo about mechanics | lasers and optics | detectors and electronics
|
this morning, I restarted the cavity after the Christmas shutdown.
everything went fine.
I got ~ 86kW for 33% laser amplifier ratio after optimization of the CEP and alignment with walking procedure. |
|
day by day run for X-ray production, posted by Ronic Chiche at ThomX igloo about mechanics | lasers and optics | detectors and electronics
|
today we did x-rays => we got 41 000 pA at maximum and 90kW in the FPC for 33% amplifier ratio.
finally, I changed the strategy for the feeback on RF.
i removed the integration and derivative parameters and reduced the gain parameter : |
|
day by day run for X-ray production, posted by Ronic Chiche at ThomX igloo about mechanics | lasers and optics | detectors and electronics
|
this morning, I restarted the lock of the CFP after almost 2 weeks without operation.
after quick alignment and CEP tuning, I got 88kW for 33% ratio for the laser amplifier.
the FPC seems pretty far from the RF frequency (2.8kHz @ 33MHz) but it's possible the present RF frequency has been tuned for 61.5 or 70MeV |
|
correlations between accelerometer and lock losses @ 20Hz, posted by Ronic Chiche at ThomX igloo about mechanics | lasers and optics | detectors and electronics
|
I installed an accelerometer setup in the bunker.
presently, the accelerometer is placed on top of the housing and its signal is connected to the 2nd scope (33MHz and 500MHz RF beating) on channel
4. |
|
correlations between accelerometer and lock losses @ 20Hz, posted by Ronic Chiche at ThomX igloo about mechanics | lasers and optics | detectors and electronics
|
today I connected a copy of the laser PZT signal to the 2nd scope CH2 (with AC coupling to remove the DC offset) to be able to monitor synchronously
the Accelerometer and laser PZT signals.
the accelerometer is still connected to the 2nd scope CH4 and placed on top of the housing. |
|
correlations between accelerometer and lock losses @ 20Hz, posted by Ronic Chiche at ThomX igloo about mechanics | lasers and optics | detectors and electronics
|
this morning, I did some measurement with nobody interfering with the tests.
- the "no noise" image shows a standard situation during 10s when there is no noise either on PZT or Accelerometer.
most of the time, we are in this situation. |
|
correlations between accelerometer and lock losses @ 20Hz, posted by Ronic Chiche at ThomX igloo about mechanics | lasers and optics | detectors and electronics 8x
|
then, I moved the accelerometer on top of the "X-hutch side" vessel, placed directly on the metal top case, inside the housing.
- the "no noise same range" image shows a standard situation during 10s when there no noise either on PZT or Accelerometer.
on can compare the noise level on the accelerometer with the previous post when it was outside on top of the housing. |
|
correlations between accelerometer and lock losses @ 20Hz, posted by Ronic Chiche at ThomX igloo about mechanics | lasers and optics | detectors and electronics
|
at the end of the day, I moved the accelerometer from the top of the cavity vessel to the top case of the Onefive laser.
I quickly saw again quite strong correlations between the vibrations compensated by the PZT and the accelerometer signal.
when one does a laser motor step which makes a systematic lock loss, one doesn't see any signal on the accelerometer. |
|
correlations between accelerometer and lock losses @ 20Hz, posted by Ronic Chiche at ThomX igloo about mechanics | lasers and optics | detectors and electronics 6x
|
this morning, I did some new plots with the accelerometer placed on the top of the case of the OneFive laser.
I previously observed with the accelerometer placed on the top of one cavity vessel, the correlation between the accelerometer signal and the PZT
noise is pretty good but not 100%. |