HOME SBOX THOMX MINICAV Utilities
THOMX orders THOMX installation THOMX commissioning THOMX control command
  Status of commissioning, report also here plots are reports.  Not logged in ELOG logo
Entry   long run to test the appearance of high frequency noise, posted by Ronic Chiche at ThomX igloo about lasers and optics | detectors and electronics long_run_with_different_FPC_power.png
    Reply   long run to test the appearance of high frequency noise, posted by Ronic Chiche at ThomX igloo about lasers and optics | detectors and electronics 2025-07-10_-_long_run.png
Message ID: 440     Entry time: Thu Jul 10 15:44:43 2025     In reply to: 439
 Author: Ronic Chiche 
 Status: Fixed 
 Type: info 
 Category: lasers and optics | detectors and electronics 
 Location: ThomX igloo 
 Title: long run to test the appearance of high frequency noise 

today, long run directly at full power (33% amplifier ratio) => 98kW in the FPC at the very begining of the run.
(P=0.05 / I=0.0005 / D=0.6)

10-40 min : almost misalignment effect (CEP did not change so much)
                   I increased 3 times the amplifier ratio to 34%, 35%, 36% to compensate the misalignment and keep the power almost constant.

then I did a full tuning (CEP + alignment)

45-110 min : misalignment effect after ~30min of warming up of the FPC => much more stable.
                    I corrected twice (@ 85min) the alignment to compensate a bit the power loss

globally, the FPC seems stable => all the lock losses come from the 20Hz noise and are recovered very quicly by the locking.
I never saw the high frequency noise which can produce long lock losses.

maybe it's time to add the gain x3 on the laser PZT channel to get some room on the 20Hz noise compensation.

Ronic Chiche wrote:

Today with Daniele, we did 6 long runs at different power (23kW, 46kW, 66kW, 73kW, 92kW, 92kW)

All the lock loss in between these several runs are due to FPC locking parameters change.
most of the few lock losses during the stable power duration, are due to 20Hz oscillation noise or because we forgot to center properly the PZT in its range (operator faults).

the 4 first runs (23kW, 46kW, 66kW, 73kW) are using the PID : (P=0.1 / I=0.0015 / D=1.5) without the additionnal optical attenuator placed after the diffuser.

the 5th run (92kW) is using the PID : (P=0.1 / I=0.0015 / D=1.5) with the additionnal optical attenuator placed after the diffuser.

the 6th run (92kW) is using the PID : (P=0.05 / I=0.0005 / D=0.6 and obviously a different diffuser position) with the additionnal optical attenuator placed after the diffuser.

surprisingly, we never saw any high frequency noise during the day !

to be noticed : the electron machine was OFF / the day was sunny without wind / almost nobody was working in the bunker.

 

Attachment 1: 2025-07-10_-_long_run.png  58 kB  | Show | Show all
ELOG V3.1.4-395e101